Search

We examine 21 solar polar coronal jets that we identify in soft X-ray images obtained from the Hinode/X-ray telescope (XRT). We identify 11 of these as blowout jets and four as standard jets (with six uncertain), based on their X-ray-spire widths being respectively wide or narrow (compared to the jet’s base) in the XRT images. From corresponding extreme ultraviolet (EUV) images from the Solar Dynamics Observatory’s (SDO) Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA), essentially all (at least 20 of 21) of the jets are made by minifilament eruptions, consistent with other recent studies. Here, we examine the detailed nature of the erupting minifilaments (EMFs) in the jet bases. Wide-spire (“blowout”) jets often have ejective EMFs, but sometimes they instead have an EMF that is mostly confined to the jet’s base rather than ejected. We also demonstrate that narrow-spire (“standard”) jets can have either a confined EMF, or a partially confined EMF where some of the cool minifilament leaks into the jet’s spire. Regarding EMF visibility: we find that in some cases the minifilament is apparent in as few as one of the four EUV channels we examined, being essentially invisible in the other channels; thus, it is necessary to examine images from multiple EUV channels before concluding that a jet does not have an EMF at its base. The sizes of the EMFs, measured projected against the sky and early in their eruption, is 14″ ± 7″, which is within a factor of 2 of other measured sizes of coronal-jet EMFs.

A recent study demonstrated that freedom of convection and strength of magnetic field in the photospheric feet of active-region (AR) coronal loops, together, can engender or quench heating in them. Other studies stress that magnetic flux cancellation at the loop-feet potentially drives heating in loops. We follow 24-hour movies of a bipolar AR, using EUV images from SDO/AIA and line-of-sight (LOS) magnetograms from SDO/HMI, to examine magnetic polarities at the feet of 23 of the brightest coronal loops. We derived FeXVIII emission (hot-94) images (using the Warren et al. method) to select the hottest/brightest loops, and confirm their footpoint locations via non-force-free field extrapolations. From 6"$\times$6" boxes centered at each loop foot in LOS magnetograms we find that $\sim$40\% of the loops have both feet in unipolar flux, and $\sim$60\% of the loops have at least one foot in mixed-polarity flux. The loops with both feet unipolar are $\sim$15\% shorter lived on average than the loops having mixed-polarity foot-point flux, but their peak-intensity averages are equal. The presence of mixed-polarity magnetic flux in at least one foot of majority of the loops suggests that flux cancellation at the footpoints may drive most of the heating. But, the absence of mixed-polarity magnetic flux (to the detection limit of HMI) in $\sim$40\% of the loops suggests that flux cancellation may not be necessary to drive heating in coronal loops -- magnetoconvection and field strength at both loop feet possibly drive much of the heating, even in the cases where a loop foot presents mixed-polarity magnetic flux., Comment: 11 pages, 5 figures

Using EUV images and line-of-sight magnetograms from Solar Dynamics Observatory, we examine eight emerging bipolar magnetic regions (BMRs) in central-disk coronal holes for whether the emerging magnetic arch made any noticeable coronal jets directly, via reconnection with ambient open field as modeled by Yokoyama & Shibata. During emergence, each BMR produced no obvious EUV coronal jet of normal brightness, but each produced one or more faint EUV coronal jets that are discernible in AIA 193 Å images. The spires of these jets are much fainter and usually narrower than for typical EUV jets that have been observed to be produced by minifilament eruptions in quiet regions and coronal holes. For each of 26 faint jets from the eight emerging BMRs, we examine whether the faint spire was evidently made a la Yokoyama & Shibata. We find that (1) 16 of these faint spires evidently originate from sites of converging opposite-polarity magnetic flux and show base brightenings like those in minifilament-eruption-driven coronal jets, (2) the 10 other faint spires maybe were made by a burst of the external-magnetic-arcade-building reconnection of the emerging magnetic arch with the ambient open field, with reconnection directly driven by the arch's emergence, but (3) none were unambiguously made by such emergence-driven reconnection. Thus, for these eight emerging BMRs, the observations indicate that emergence-driven external reconnection of the emerging magnetic arch with ambient open field at most produces a jet spire that is much fainter than in previously reported, much more obvious coronal jets driven by minifilament eruptions.

Many solar coronal jets result from erupting miniature-filament (“minifilament”) magnetic flux ropes that reconnect with encountered surrounding far-reaching field. Many of those minifilament flux ropes are apparently built and triggered to erupt by magnetic flux cancelation. If that cancelation (or some other process) results in the flux rope’s field having twist, then the reconnection with the far-reaching field transfers much of that twist to that reconnected far-reaching field. In cases where that surrounding field is open, the twist can propagate to far distances from the Sun as a magnetic-twist Alfvénic pulse. We argue that such pulses from jets could be the kinked-magnetic-field structures known as “switchbacks,” detected in the solar wind during perihelion passages of the Parker Solar Probe (PSP). For typical coronal-jet-generated Alfvénic pulses, we expect that the switchbacks would flow pastPSPwith a duration of several tens of minutes; larger coronal jets might produce switchbacks with passage durations ∼1hr. Smaller-scale jet-like features on the Sun known as “jetlets” may be small-scale versions of coronal jets, produced in a similar manner as the coronal jets. We estimate that switchbacks from jetlets would flow pastPSPwith a duration of a few minutes. Chromospheric spicules are jet-like features that are even smaller than jetlets. If some portion of their population are indeed very-small-scale versions of coronal jets, then we speculate that the same processes could result in switchbacks that passPSPwith durations ranging from about ∼2 min down to tens of seconds.

We follow up on the Sterling et al (2015) discovery that nearly all polar coronal X-ray jets are made by an explosive eruption of closed magnetic field carrying a miniature filament in its core. In the same X-ray and EUV movies used by Sterling et al (2015), we examine the onset and growth of the driving magnetic explosion in 15 of the 20 jets that they studied. We find evidence that: (1) in a large majority of polar X-ray jets, the runaway internal/tether-cutting reconnection under the erupting minifilament flux rope starts after both the minifilaments rise and the spire-producing external/breakout reconnection have started and (2) in a large minority, (a) before the eruption starts there is a current sheet between the explosive closed field and the ambient open field, and (b) the eruption starts with breakout reconnection at that current sheet. The variety of event sequences in the eruptions supports the idea that the magnetic explosions that make polar X-ray jets work the same way as the much larger magnetic explosions that make a flare and coronal mass ejection (CME). That idea, and recent observations indicating that magnetic flux cancelation is the fundamental process that builds the field in and around the pre-jet mininfilament and triggers that fields jet-driving explosion, together suggest that flux cancelation inside the magnetic arcade that explodes in a flare/CME eruption is usually the fundamental process that builds the explosive field in the core of the arcade and triggers that fields explosion., Comment: 39 pages, 17 figures, 2 tables

We study a series of X-ray-bright, rapidly-evolving active-region coronal jets outside the leading sunspot of AR 12259, using Hinode/XRT, SDO/AIA and HMI, and IRIS data. The detailed evolution of such rapidly evolving "violent" jets remained a mystery after our previous investigation of active region jets (Sterling et al. 2016, Paper 1). The jets we investigate here erupt from three localized subregions, each containing a rapidly evolving (positive) minority-polarity magnetic-flux patch bathed in a (majority) negative-polarity magnetic-flux background. At least several of the jets begin with eruptions of what appear to be thin (thickness

Solar tornados are dynamical, conspicuously helical magnetic structures mainly observed as a prominence activity. We investigate and propose a triggering mechanism for the solar tornado observed in a prominence cavity by SDO/AIA on September 25, 2011. High-cadence EUV images from the SDO/AIA and the Ahead spacecraft of STEREO/EUVI are used to correlate three flares in the neighbouring active-region (NOAA 11303), and their EUV waves, with the dynamical developments of the tornado. The timings of the flares and EUV waves observed on-disk in 195\AA\ are analyzed in relation to the tornado activities observed at the limb in 171\AA. Each of the three flares and its related EUV wave occurred within 10 hours of the onset of the tornado. They have an observed causal relationship with the commencement of activity in the prominence where the tornado develops. Tornado-like rotations along the side of the prominence start after the second flare. The prominence cavity expands with acceleration of tornado motion after the third flare. Flares in the neighbouring active region may have affected the cavity prominence system and triggered the solar tornado. A plausible mechanism is that the active-region coronal field contracted by the `Hudson effect' due to the loss of magnetic energy as flares. Subsequently the cavity expanded by its magnetic pressure to fill the surrounding low corona. We suggest that the tornado is the dynamical response of the helical prominence field to the cavity expansion., Comment: 7 pages, 8 Figures, accepted for publication in A&A, Movies can be found at http://www.mps.mpg.de/data/outgoing/panesar/tornado/