Search

In the paper "Linear time algorithm to cover and hit a set of line segments optimally by two axis-parallel squares", TCS Volume 769 (2019), pages 63--74, the LHIT problem is proposed as follows: For a given set of non-intersecting line segments ${\cal L} = \{\ell_1, \ell_2, \ldots, \ell_n\}$ in $I\!\!R^2$, compute two axis-parallel congruent squares ${\cal S}_1$ and ${\cal S}_2$ of minimum size whose union hits all the line segments in $\cal L$, and a linear time algorithm was proposed. Later it was observed that the algorithm has a bug. In this corrigendum, we corrected the algorithm. The time complexity of the corrected algorithm is $O(n^2)$.

Given a set $P$ of $n$ points on $\mathbb R^{2}$, we address the problem of computing an axis-parallel empty rectangular annulus $A$ of maximum-width such that no point of $P$ lies inside $A$ but all points of $P$ must lie inside, outside and on the boundaries of two parallel rectangles forming the annulus $A$. We propose an $O(n^3)$ time and $O(n)$ space algorithm to solve the problem. In a particular case when the inner rectangle of an axis-parallel empty rectangular annulus reduces to an input point we can solve the problem in $O(n \log n)$ time and $O(n)$ space.

This paper discusses the problem of covering and hitting a set of line segments $\cal L$ in ${\mathbb R}^2$ by a pair of axis-parallel squares such that the side length of the larger of the two squares is minimized. We also discuss the restricted version of covering, where each line segment in $\cal L$ is to be covered completely by at least one square. The proposed algorithm for the covering problem reports the optimum result by executing only two passes of reading the input data sequentially. The algorithm proposed for the hitting and restricted covering problems produces optimum result in $O(n)$ time. All the proposed algorithms are in-place, and they use only $O(1)$ extra space. The solution of these problems also give a $\sqrt{2}$ approximation for covering and hitting those line segments $\cal L$ by two congruent disks of minimum radius with same computational complexity., Comment: A preliminary version of this paper appeared in COCOON 2017, pages 457-468