Search

In this survey we describe a recently-developed technique for bounding the number (and controlling the typical structure) of finite objects with forbidden substructures. This technique exploits a subtle clustering phenomenon exhibited by the independent sets of uniform hypergraphs whose edges are sufficiently evenly distributed; more precisely, it provides a relatively small family of 'containers' for the independent sets, each of which contains few edges. We attempt to convey to the reader a general high-level overview of the method, focusing on a small number of illustrative applications in areas such as extremal graph theory, Ramsey theory, additive combinatorics, and discrete geometry, and avoiding technical details as much as possible., Comment: 29 pages

In this paper, we address the problem of packing large trees in $G_{n,p}$. In particular, we prove the following result. Suppose that $T_1, \dotsc, T_N$ are $n$-vertex trees, each of which has maximum degree at most $(np)^{1/6} / (\log n)^6$. Then with high probability, one can find edge-disjoint copies of all the $T_i$ in the random graph $G_{n,p}$, provided that $p \geq (\log n)^{36}/n$ and $N \le (1-\varepsilon)np/2$ for a positive constant $\varepsilon$. Moreover, if each $T_i$ has at most $(1-\alpha)n$ vertices, for some positive $\alpha$, then the same result holds under the much weaker assumptions that $p \geq (\log n)^2/(cn)$ and $\Delta(T_i) \leq c np / \log n$ for some~$c$ that depends only on $\alpha$ and $\varepsilon$. Our assumptions on maximum degrees of the trees are significantly weaker than those in all previously known approximate packing results.

A set of elements of a finite abelian group is called sum-free if it contains no Schur triple, i.e., no triple of elements $x,y,z$ with $x+y=z$. The study of how large the largest sum-free subset of a given abelian group is had started more than thirty years before it was finally resolved by Green and Ruzsa a decade ago. We address the following more general question. Suppose that a set $A$ of elements of an abelian group $G$ has cardinality $a$. How many Schur triples must $A$ contain? Moreover, which sets of $a$ elements of $G$ have the smallest number of Schur triples? In this paper, we answer these questions for various groups $G$ and ranges of $a$., Comment: 20 pages; corrected the erroneous equality in (1) in the statement of Theorem 1.3

A grounded M-Lipschitz function on a rooted d-ary tree is an integer-valued map on the vertices that changes by at most along edges and attains the value zero on the leaves. We study the behavior of such functions, specifically, their typical value at the root v_0 of the tree. We prove that the probability that the value of a uniformly chosen random function at v_0 is more than M+t is doubly-exponentially small in t. We also show a similar bound for continuous (real-valued) grounded Lipschitz functions., Comment: 8 pages

Two years ago, Conlon and Gowers, and Schacht proved general theorems that allow one to transfer a large class of extremal combinatorial results from the deterministic to the probabilistic setting. Even though the two papers solve the same set of long-standing open problems in probabilistic combinatorics, the methods used in them vary significantly and therefore yield results that are not comparable in certain aspects. The theorem of Schacht can be applied in a more general setting and yields stronger probability estimates, whereas the one of Conlon and Gowers also implies random versions of some structural statements such as the famous stability theorem of Erdos and Simonovits. In this paper, we bridge the gap between these two transference theorems. Building on the approach of Schacht, we prove a general theorem that allows one to transfer deterministic stability results to the probabilistic setting that is somewhat more general and stronger than the one obtained by Conlon and Gowers. We then use this theorem to derive several new results, among them a random version of the Erdos-Simonovits stability theorem for arbitrary graphs. The main new idea, a refined approach to multiple exposure when considering subsets of binomial random sets, may be of independent interest., Comment: 19 pages; slightly simplified proof of the main theorem; fixed a few typos