Search

Low evaporator airflow is one of the common faults for rooftop units. It can be caused by dirty filters, evaporator fouling, or loose belts. Low airflow could result in frozen evaporator coils, reduced cooling capacity, and indoor comfort issues. Accordingly, more fan power is consumed as longer operating time is required. With the widespread use of variable-frequency drives (VFDs) on rooftop units (RTUs), low evaporator airflow can be potentially detected by monitoring the fan-power variation. In this paper the principle of fan-power-based detection is introduced first. Then, the detection algorithm is proposed, including development of the baseline and comparison of operational data with the baseline. Finally, the conducted field test is discussed, verifying the proposed methods. The test results indicate that the fan-power-based method can effectively detect low evaporator airflow for rooftop units. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

contemporary house located in California has a unique HVAC .system featuring radiant floor heating and cooling, forced-air hydronic heating and cooling, and a system that ventilates the house at night to reduce air conditioner energy use bv pre-cooling building mass. The purpose of this study was to compare the energy consumption and electrical power demand characteristics of the various heating and cooling operating modes. Cooling season testing involved three different operating modes during similar weather conditions and comparable indoor comfort conditions. Heating testing involved operation in two test modes: hydronic radiant floor heating and hydronic forced-air heating, both by heating water with natural gas. Energy performance results reveal that slab pre-cooling caused some of the energy demand to shift from primarily in the afternoon. Coupling slab pre-cooling with nighttime ventilation air significantly shifted the energy demand load from primarily in the afternoon to late night with the load coming mainly from the fan. Also, during comparable outside conditions, there were appreciable energy differences among cooling modes and no identifiable energy advantage was noticed during the heating mode. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]