Search

N 6 -methyladenosine (m 6 A) is a dynamic posttranscriptional RNA modification that plays an important role in determining transcript fate. The functional consequence of m 6 A deposition is dictated by a group of host proteins that specifically recognize and bind the m 6 A modification, leading to changes in RNA stability, transport, splicing, or translation. The cellular m 6 A methylome undergoes changes during certain pathogenic conditions such as viral infections. However, how m 6 A modification of host cell transcripts and noncoding RNAs change during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection has not been reported. Here, we define the epitranscriptomic m 6 A profile of SARS-CoV-2-infected human lung epithelial cells compared to uninfected controls. We identified mRNA and long and small noncoding RNA species that are differentially m 6 A modified in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The most significantly differentially methylated transcript was the precursor of microRNA-4486 (miRNA-4486), which showed significant increases in abundance and percentage of methylated transcripts in infected cells. Pathway analyses revealed that differentially methylated transcripts were significantly associated with several cancer-related pathways, protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum, cell death, and proliferation. Upstream regulators predicted to be associated with the proteins encoded by differentially methylated mRNAs include several proteins involved in the type-I interferon response, inflammation, and cytokine signaling. IMPORTANCE Posttranscriptional modification of viral and cellular RNA by N 6 -methyladenosine (m 6 A) plays an important role in regulating the replication of many viruses and the cellular immune response to infection. We therefore sought to define the epitranscriptomic m 6 A profile of human lung epithelial cells infected with SARS-CoV-2. Our analyses demonstrate the differential methylation of both coding and noncoding cellular RNAs in SARS-CoV-2-infected cells compared to uninfected controls. Pathway analyses revealed that several of these RNAs may be involved in the cellular response to infection, such as type-I interferon. Our study implicates m 6 A modification of infected-cell RNA as a mechanism of posttranscriptional gene regulation during SARS-CoV-2 infection.

The spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is arranged as a trimer on the virus surface, composed of three S1 and three S2 subunits. Infected and vaccinated individuals generate antibodies against spike, which can neutralize the virus. Most antibodies target the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and N-terminal domain (NTD) of S1; however, antibodies against other regions of spike have also been isolated. The interhost variability in domain specificity and relative neutralization efficacy of the antibodies is still poorly characterized. To this end, we tested serum and plasma samples collected from 85 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent subjects. Samples were analyzed using seven immunoassays that employ different domains, subunits, and oligomeric forms of spike to capture the antibodies. Samples were also tested for their neutralization of pseudovirus containing SARS-CoV-2 spike and of replication-competent SARS-CoV-2. While the total amount of anti-spike antibodies produced varied among convalescent subjects, we observed an unexpectedly fixed ratio of RBD- to NTD-targeting antibodies. The relative potency of the response (defined as the measured neutralization efficacy relative to the total level of spike-targeting antibodies) also exhibited limited variation between subjects and was not associated with the overall amount of antispike antibodies produced. These studies suggest that host-to-host variation in the polyclonal response elicited against SARS-CoV-2 spike in early pandemic subjects is primarily limited to the quantity of antibodies generated rather than their domain specificity or relative neutralization potency. IMPORTANCE Infection by SARS-CoV-2 elicits antibodies against various domains of the spike protein, including the RBD and NTD of subunit S1 and against subunit S2. The antibody responses of different infected individuals exhibit different efficacies to inactivate (neutralize) the virus. Here, we show that the observed variation in the neutralizing activity of the antibody responses in COVID-19 convalescent subjects is caused by differences in the amounts of antibodies rather than their recognition properties or the potency of their antiviral activity. These findings suggest that COVID-19 vaccine strategies that focus on enhancing the overall level of the antibodies will likely elicit a more uniformly efficacious protective response.