Search

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the virological response to a new antiretroviral treatment (ART2) after failure of a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)-containing regimen., Design: Retrospective observational study based on the Italian ARCA cohort database. Adult patients were included if they had a virological failure (defined as plasma viral load above 500 copies/ml in two subsequent visits) while on a treatment with one NNRTI plus 2 NRTIs, had an available HIV genotype., Results: Patients on ART2 were followed up for 791 person/year and median follow up was 10.8 months(IQR 5.2-26). Variables associated with reduced risk of ART2 virological failure at univariable analysis had started the treatment in recent years (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.86-0.94, p < 0.0001) and duration of previous NNRTI treatment (HR 0.995; 95%CI 0.990-0.990, p=0.045). Variables associated with increased risk of virological failure of ART2 were a higher plasma viral load (pVL) at baseline(HR 1.2; 95% CI 1.07-1.34, p=0.002) and the type of treatment, in particular an unboosted PI-containing regimen vs. a boosted PI-containing regimen(HR 1.6; 95%CI 1.25-2.04 p < 0.0001) and a non-PI-containing vs. a boosted PI-containing regimen (HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.25-1.96, p < 0.0001). At multivariable analysis, year of ART2 start, pVL at NNRTI failure as well as using a boosted PI remained statistically significant predictors., Conclusion: This study highlights the role of drugs with high genetic barrier, such as boosted PI as a cornerstone to build a new antiretroviral treatment in patients failing a NNRTI based regimen.

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the impact of HCV infection and of HCV genotypes on immune restoration in HIV-infected patients on a successful HAART regimen., Methods: Patients from the MASTER Study were included in this current longitudinal study if they met the following criteria: being on any successful HAART, availability of CD4+ cell count and HIV RNA level before starting the suppressive HAART and 12 months after suppressive therapy, availability of HCV antibodies. The primary endpoints of the study were defined as achieving a difference above 100 cell/mmc between CD4+ at baseline and at time of HIV RNA suppression while on therapy (DeltaCD4+early), or 12 month after a suppressive therapy (DeltaCD4+late)., Results: 844 HIV-positive patients were included in the analysis: 673 were HCV-negative and 171 were HCV-positive [92 (53.8%) subjects had HCV genotype 1; 58 (33.9%), genotype 3; 21 (12.3%), genotype 4]. Plasma HIV RNA (both baseline as highest value), nadir CD4+, being naïve, time to reach undetectable plasma HIV RNA, treatment with PI vs NNRTI were associated with an early immunological recovery; the occurrence of previous AIDS event, a history of injection drug use, and HCV infection were associated with failure to achieve an early immunological recovery. Variables associated with DeltaCD4+late immune recovery were baseline CD4+ value, plasma HIV RNA (both baseline as highest value), being naïve and time to reach undetectable plasma HIV RNA. HCV infection per se was not associated with a worse probability to reach late immunologic response, although among HCV infected patients, having a genotype 3 was associated with a worse immune recovery. At multivariable analysis, factors that remained associated with failure to achieve an early immunological response were being HCV infected and history of injection drug use, while those associated with a failure to achieve a late immunological response were being infected with HCV genotype 3 and older age., Conclusions: A blunted early immune recovery was observed in HCV infected patients, compared with HCV negative subjects, while late immune recovery was not different among HCV infected as a whole and not infected subjects; only the subgroup of subjects infected with genotype 3 showed an impaired late immune recovery.

Tipranavir, a non-peptidic protease inhibitor which shows in vitro efficacy against some HIV-1-resistant strains, can be used in salvage therapies for multi-experienced HIV patients due to its peculiar resistance profile including 21 mutations at 16 protease positions according to International AIDS Society (IAS). Other genotypic scores, however, which attribute a different weight to single amino-acid substitutions, have been recently proposed. To validate the clinical utility of four different genotypic scores for selecting tipranavir responders, the baseline resistance pattern of 176 HIV heavily experienced patients was correlated with virological success (HIV-RNA<50 copies/ml) after 24 weeks of a new treatment based on tipranavir/ritonavir. Virological suppression after 24 weeks was reached by 42.5% of patients. With univariate analysis, genotypic scores were all associated with outcome but showed a low accuracy with ROC analysis, with the weighted score (WS) by Scherer et al. demonstrating the best performance with an AUC of 68%. Only 52% of patients classified as susceptible (WS< or =3) responded to the new therapy. The following variables were significantly associated (p<0.05) to failure with multivariate analysis: WS, log peak of HIV-RNA, IAS mutations: L33F, I54AMV, Q58E, and non-IAS mutation: N37DES. On the contrary, the use of T20 in T20-naïve patients and the V82AFSI and F53LY non-IAS mutations were associated with virological success. The study suggests that even if the "weighted" scores are able to interpret correctly the antiretroviral resistance profile of multi-experienced patients, it is difficult to individuate a cut-off which can be easily applied to this population for discriminating responders.

HIV infected patients treated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) may be at increased risk of cardiovascular events, particularly if based upon the use of protease inhibitors (PI). We investigated the haemostatic markers of cardiovascular risk in 115 HIV infected subjects, divided into four groups : 1) patients naïve to antiretroviral therapy (Naïve; n=34 patients), or subjects that had been on a stable combination therapy for > or =12 months with either: 2) double reverse transcriptase nucleoside analogue inhibitors therapy (2NRTI; n=26), 3) 2NRTI backbone plus a non-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI; n=27), and 4) on a PI based regimen (PI; n=28). Forty-four healthy subjects were included as controls. Naïve as well as 2NRTI and NNRTI differed from controls for higher F1+2 (P<.0001) and FVII (P<.007) levels. When comparing PI patients with controls we observed significantly higher levels of Fbg (P=.035), FVII (P<.0001), TM (P<.0089), vWF (P=.009), and F1+2 (P<.0001). The only difference observed among the 4 groups of HIV infected patients was a significantly lower level of F1+2 in PI as compared with NNRTI patients (P=.05) At least one abnormal result was observed in > or = 90.6% of HIV infects groups, vs 43.2% of controls (P<.0001 in all cases). In conclusion, a) HIV infection per se may alter the haemostatic markers of cardiovascular risk, b) minor differences were observed among the different classes of HIV infected patients, namely between NNRTI and PI treated patients.