Search

Gene therapy has the potential to treat both acquired and inherited genetic diseases. Generally, two types of gene delivery vectors are used - viral vectors and non-viral vectors. Non-viral gene delivery systems have attracted significant interest (e.g. 115 gene therapies approved for clinical trials in 2018; clinicaltrials.gov) due to their lower toxicity, lack of immunogenicity and ease of production compared to viral vectors. To achieve the goal of maximal therapeutic efficacy with minimal adverse effects, the cell-specific targeting of non-viral gene delivery systems has attracted research interest. Targeting through cell surface receptors; the enhanced permeability and retention effect, or pH differences are potential means to target genes to specific organs, tissues, or cells. As for targeting moieties, receptorspecific ligand peptides, antibodies, aptamers and affibodies have been incorporated into synthetic nonviral gene delivery vectors to fulfill the requirement of active targeting. This review provides an overview of different potential targets and targeting moieties to target specific gene delivery systems., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Gene therapy requires safe and effective vectors to deliver genes to their target site of action. Non-viral gene delivery systems have attracted growing attention due to their low toxicity, low immunogenicity and ease of production compared to viral vectors. Most non-viral gene delivery systems enter cells via endocytic pathways, and their escape from endosomes is therefore crucial for successful transfection. Several reagents have been developed to promote endosomal escape, including peptides, polymers and lipids. Among these, endosome-disrupting peptides have been used in many studies, and have proven to be one of the most promising approaches to overcome endosomal entrapment and lysosomal degradation. This review provides an up-to-date summary of strategies for enhancing endosomal escape, with a focus on the modification of endosome-disrupting peptides to further increase the efficient delivery of oligonucleotides.

Although most commercial vaccines are delivered by injection, there is an increasing interest in needle-free vaccine delivery for reasons including the ability to elicit immune responses at mucosal surfaces, ease of administration, and the ability to administer vaccines without the need for trained medical professionals. This review summarizes strategies and technologies that are being used to improve oral vaccine absorption. Peptides and proteins, which comprise important vaccine components, exhibit unfavorable physicochemical properties including degradation in the gastrointestinal tract, and poor transport across the intestinal wall, which hinder oral vaccine development. Approaches to overcome these obstacles aim to provide new vaccines and delivery systems that are capable of eliciting protective immune responses, and are making an impact on current vaccine development.

Despite the important role of adjuvants for vaccine development, relatively few adjuvants have been successfully incorporated into vaccines intended for human administration. This is in part due to the high toxicity associated with many experimental adjuvants. This lack of choice effectively hinders the ability to produce vaccines against many diseases, or to improve current vaccine formulations. The conjugation of immunostimulatory lipids to peptide antigens, to produce self-adjuvanting lipopeptide vaccines, has been tested in human clinical trials. These systems appear to have a number of advantages over more traditional adjuvants (e.g. alum salts) including the capacity for these vaccines to be administered via mucosal routes (e.g. orally or nasally) instead of by injection, elicitation of antigen-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes and mucosal immunity, as well as little-to-no observed toxicity. Several lipopeptide vaccine systems have been described in the literature, ranging from the conjugation of single fatty acid chains, to the conjugation of more complex lipids and glycolipids onto peptide antigens. The following review provides an overview of the most studied lipopeptide vaccine systems grouped into the following categories: 1) bacterial lipopeptides, including tri-palmitoyl-S-glyceryl cysteine (Pam3Cys) and di-palmitoyl-S--glyceryl cysteine (Pam2Cys); 2) the lipid-core peptide (LCP) and multiple antigen lipophilic adjuvant carrier (MALAC) systems; 3) single-chain palmitoylated peptides; and 4) glycolipids (e.g. monophosphoryl lipid A). The review also discusses the potential mechanisms of action for lipopeptide and glycolipopeptide vaccines, as well as structure activity relationships, and provides examples of studies utilising each system.

Preclinical studies carried out over the last seven years by our group have focused on the development of a group A streptococcal (GAS) vaccine based on the antiphagocytic bacterial surface M protein using the Lipid-Core Peptide (LCP) system. This synthetic peptide vaccine delivery system has several advantages over other delivery systems including its self-adjuvanting properties and the ability to incorporate multiple peptide epitopes into a single vaccine. This review describes various vaccine delivery strategies including the LCP system, highlighting its functional properties and applications in vaccine research using data obtained from various LCP-based GAS vaccine candidates evaluated in murine models.

The mucosal administration of vaccines is an area currently receiving a high level of interest due to potential advantages offered by this technique. These advantages include the ability to administer vaccines without need for needles, thus improving patient compliance with vaccination schedules, and the capacity to induce immune responses capable of preventing infections at the site of acquisition. Despite these advantages a number of limitations exist which currently inhibit our ability to successfully develop new mucosal vaccines. As such, much research is currently focused on developing new adjuvants and delivery systems to overcome these difficulties. However, despite high levels of interest in this area, relatively few mucosal vaccine candidates have successfully progressed to human clinical trials. In the review that follows, we aim to provide the reader with an overview of the immune system with respect to induction of mucosal immune responses. Furthermore, the review provides an overview of a number of microbial (bacterial toxins, CpG DNA, cytokines/chemokines, live vectors, and virus like particles) and synthetic (microspheres, liposomes, and lipopeptides) strategies that have been investigated as adjuvants or delivery systems for mucosal vaccine development, with a focus on the delivery of vaccines via the oral route.