Search

INTRODUCTION COPD is among the most common causes for secondary pulmonary hypertension (PH). Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is recommended in the standard treatment of COPD. In this study, efficiency of multidisciplinary PR in COPD patients with PH was examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS 88 patients stable COPD patients who applied to our center between 2008-2013 were enrolled. Un-likely PH patients were grouped as Group 1 while possible and likely PH cases were accepted as Group 2. There were no other cause for PH. All the patients received patient-specific, multidisciplinary 8-week PR. Dyspnea perception was assessed via MRC dyspnea scale, health-related quality of life with S. George life quality questionnaire, exercise capacity via incremental shuttle walking test and endurance shuttle walking test and body composition via bioelectrical impedance test before and after PR program. RESULTS In all the patients there were significant improvements in body composition (BMI p= 0.013), quality of life (SGRQ semp., activity, total p< 0.001), dyspnea perception (MRC p< 0.001) and exercise capacity (ISWTT, ESWT, VO2 peak p< 0.001) after PR program. Improvements in Group 2 were observed to be significantly greater. CONCLUSION PR is an effective and safe option in COPD patients with PH. These patients should be directed to PH programs for supervised exercise training and chronic disease management and patient-specific PR programs should be established.

In severely disabled patients who are not capable of following formal pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and/or tolerating higher training intensities, neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been successfully utilized as a localized training method.In this non-randomized controlled observational study 50 patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), who were allocated into two groups. Endurance training group (ET) (n= 27) and NMES group (n= 23). To compare the effects of NMES and ET on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), exercise capacity, muscle strength, dyspnea, psychological status, and body composition in patients with severe COPD. Before and after PR program, the study parameters were assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, incremental and endurance shuttle walking tests (ISWT, ESWT), manual muscle testing (MMT), the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), bioelectrical impedance analysis, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).After the PR program, walking distance and endurance time significantly increased in both groups (p0.001 for each), whereas the MRC scores of both groups significantly decreased (p0.001 for each). In the ET group, significant decreases were noted in all domains of SGRQ and HADS. In the NMES group, significant improvements were observed in the HADS scores and in all SGRQ domain except symptom domain. No significant differences were observed between the NMES and ET groups regarding the changes from baseline to after PR program in walking distance (p= 0.140), endurance time (p= 0.376), the MRC (p= 0.540), HRQOL (p0.05) and HADS (p0.05) scores, body-mass index (BMI) (p= 0.49), fat-free mass (FFM) (p= 0.50) and fat-free mass index (FFMI) (p= 0.94).NMES can be used as an effective treatment strategy in PR programs for peripheral muscle training in patients with severe COPD.

Introduction Interstitial lung diseases are characterised by dyspnea on exertion, low quality of life, cough and exercise intolerance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with interstitial lung disease. Materials and methods Data from patients who were referred to pulmonary rehabilitation with the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases were included to this study. Ten patients with interstitial lung disease participated to our outpatient, 8 weeks, comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation programme. Dyspnea was assessed with the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale; health related quality of life was assessed with the St.George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Exercise capacity was measured using the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) and endurance shuttle walk test (ESWT); anxiety and depression were assessed with the hospital anxiety depression scale (HADS). All parameters were recorded before and after pulmonary rehabilitation programme. Results Dyspnea sensation, anxiety and depression scores decreased after pulmonary rehabilitation (p: 0.023, p: 0.026, p: 0.039 respectively). Also impact domains of SGRQ significantly reduced (Z= 1.988; p= 0.047).The difference between median values of ISWT results before and after pulmonary rehabilitation was 60 meters. Although it was not statistically significant (Z= 1.863; p= 0.063), the level of increment was higher than the minimaly important clinical differance for ISWT. Conclusion Our results showed that comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation programmes were benefical for patients with interstitial lung diseases and it should be regarded as a standard care in this population from the early stages.