1. Advancing engagement methods for trials: the CORE study relational model of engagement for a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial of experience-based co-design for people living with severe mental illnesses
- Author
-
Wayne Weavell, John Furler, David Pierce, Lauralie Richard, Victoria J Palmer, Donella Piper, Kali Godbee, Jane Gunn, Rick Iedema, and Rosemary Callander
- Subjects
Psychotherapist ,Research Subjects ,Applied psychology ,Psychological intervention ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,Participatory action research ,Context (language use) ,Stepped wedge design ,Severity of Illness Index ,Workflow ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Complex interventions ,medicine ,Humans ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Systems thinking ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Cluster randomised controlled trial ,Engagement model ,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ,lcsh:R5-920 ,030505 public health ,Community engagement ,business.industry ,Mental Disorders ,Patient Selection ,Methodology ,Mental illness ,medicine.disease ,Relational model ,Experience-based co-design ,Patient Participation ,lcsh:Medicine (General) ,0305 other medical science ,business - Abstract
Background Engagement is essential in trials research but is rarely embedded across all stages of the research continuum. The development, use, effectiveness and value of engagement in trials research is poorly researched and understood, and models of engagement are rarely informed by theory. This article describes an innovative methodological approach for the development and application of a relational model of engagement in a stepped wedge designed cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT), the CORE study. The purpose of the model is to embed engagement across the continuum of the trial which will test if an experience-based co-design intervention improves psychosocial recovery for people affected by severe mental illness. Methods The model was developed in three stages and used a structured iterative approach. A context mapping assessment of trial sites was followed by a literature review on recruitment and retention of hard-to-reach groups in complex interventions and RCTs. Relevant theoretical and philosophical underpinnings were identified by an additional review of literature to inform model development and enactment of engagement activities. Results Policy, organisational and service user data combined with evidence from the literature on barriers to recruitment provided contextual information. Four perspectives support the theoretical framework of the relational model of engagement and this is organised around two facets: the relational and continuous. The relational facet is underpinned by relational ethical theories and participatory action research principles. The continuous facet is supported by systems thinking and translation theories. These combine to enact an ethics of engagement and evoke knowledge mobilisation to reach the higher order goals of the model. Conclusions Engagement models are invaluable for trials research, but there are opportunities to advance their theoretical development and application, particularly within stepped wedge designed studies where there may be a significant waiting period between enrolment in a study and receipt of an intervention.
- Published
- 2017