Search

Background: Predicting drug-target interactions is time-consuming and expensive. It is important to present the accuracy of the calculation method. There are many algorithms to predict global interactions, some of which use drug-target networks for prediction (ie, a bipartite graph of bound drug pairs and targets known to interact). Although these algorithms can predict some drug-target interactions to some extent, there is little effect for some new drugs or targets that have no known interaction. Results: Since the datasets are usually located at or near low-dimensional nonlinear manifolds, we propose an improved GRMF (graph regularized matrix factorization) method to learn these flow patterns in combination with the previous matrix-decomposition method. In addition, we use one of the pre-processing steps previously proposed to improve the accuracy of the prediction. Conclusions: Cross-validation is used to evaluate our method, and simulation experiments are used to predict new interactions. In most cases, our method is superior to other methods. Finally, some examples of new drugs and new targets are predicted by performing simulation experiments. And the improved GRMF method can better predict the remaining drug-target interactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Predicting drug-disease interactions (DDIs) is time-consuming and expensive. Improving the accuracy of prediction results is necessary, and it is crucial to develop a novel computing technology to predict new DDIs. The existing methods mostly use the construction of heterogeneous networks to predict new DDIs. However, the number of known interacting drug-disease pairs is small, so there will be many errors in this heterogeneous network that will interfere with the final results. Results: A novel method, known as the dual-network L2,1-collaborative matrix factorization, is proposed to predict novel DDIs. The Gaussian interaction profile kernels and L2,1-norm are introduced in our method to achieve better results than other advanced methods. The network similarities of drugs and diseases with their chemical and semantic similarities are combined in this method. Conclusions: Cross validation is used to evaluate our method, and simulation experiments are used to predict new interactions using two different datasets. Finally, our prediction accuracy is better than other existing methods. This proves that our method is feasible and effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Traditional drug identification methods follow the "one drug-one target" thought. But those methods ignore the natural characters of human diseases. To overcome this limitation, many identification methods of drug-pathway association pairs have been developed, such as the integrative penalized matrix decomposition (iPaD) method. The iPaD method imposes the L 1 -norm penalty on the regularization term. However, lasso-type penalties have an obvious disadvantage, that is, the sparsity produced by them is too dispersive., Results: Therefore, to improve the performance of the iPaD method, we propose a novel method named L 2,1 -iPaD to identify paired drug-pathway associations. In the L 2,1 -iPaD model, we use the L 2,1 -norm penalty to replace the L 1 -norm penalty since the L 2,1 -norm penalty can produce row sparsity., Conclusions: By applying the L 2,1 -iPaD method to the CCLE and NCI-60 datasets, we demonstrate that the performance of L 2,1 -iPaD method is superior to existing methods. And the proposed method can achieve better enrichment in terms of discovering validated drug-pathway association pairs than the iPaD method by performing permutation test. The results on the two real datasets prove that our method is effective.