34 results on '"Hardeman, Wendy"'
Search Results
2. Promoting physical activity in a multi-ethnic population at high risk of diabetes: the 48-month PROPELS randomised controlled trial
- Author
-
Khunti, Kamlesh, Griffin, Simon, Brennan, Alan, Dallosso, Helen, Davies, Melanie J., Eborall, Helen C., Edwardson, Charlotte L., Gray, Laura J., Hardeman, Wendy, Heathcote, Laura, Henson, Joe, Pollard, Daniel, Sharp, Stephen J., Sutton, Stephen, Troughton, Jacqui, and Yates, Tom
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. A scoping review of evaluation frameworks and their applicability to real-world physical activity and dietary change programme evaluation
- Author
-
Fynn, Judith F., Hardeman, Wendy, Milton, Karen, and Jones, Andy P.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Correction to: Assessing the acceptability of a text messaging service and smartphone app to support patient adherence to medications prescribed for high blood pressure: a pilot study
- Author
-
Kassavou, Aikaterini, A’Court, Charlotte Emily, Chauhan, Jagmohan, Brimicombe, James David, Bhattacharya, Debi, Naughton, Felix, Hardeman, Wendy, Mascolo, Cecilia, and Sutton, Stephen
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Assessing the acceptability of a text messaging service and smartphone app to support patient adherence to medications prescribed for high blood pressure: a pilot study
- Author
-
Kassavou, Aikaterini, A’Court, Charlotte Emily, Chauhan, Jagmohan, Brimicombe, James David, Bhattacharya, Debi, Naughton, Felix, Hardeman, Wendy, Mascolo, Cecilia, and Sutton, Stephen
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. A systematic review of the use and reporting of evaluation frameworks within evaluations of physical activity interventions
- Author
-
Fynn, Judith F., Hardeman, Wendy, Milton, Karen, Murphy, Joseph, and Jones, Andy
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. A randomised feasibility study of serial magnetic resonance imaging to reduce treatment times in Charcot neuroarthropathy in people with diabetes (CADOM): a protocol
- Author
-
Gooday, Catherine, Game, Frances, Woodburn, Jim, Poland, Fiona, Sims, Erika, Dhatariya, Ketan, Shepstone, Lee, and Hardeman, Wendy
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Differences in objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behaviour between white Europeans and south Asians recruited from primary care: cross-sectional analysis of the PROPELS trial
- Author
-
Biddle, Gregory J. H., Edwardson, Charlotte L., Rowlands, Alex V., Davies, Melanie J., Bodicoat, Danielle H., Hardeman, Wendy, Eborall, Helen, Sutton, Stephen, Griffin, Simon, Khunti, Kamlesh, and Yates, Thomas
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. A systematic review of just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) to promote physical activity
- Author
-
Hardeman, Wendy, Houghton, Julie, Lane, Kathleen, Jones, Andy, and Naughton, Felix
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Walk with Me: a protocol for a pilot RCT of a peer-led walking programme to increase physical activity in inactive older adults
- Author
-
Tully, Mark A., Cunningham, Conor, Cupples, Margaret E., Farrell, Duane, Hardeman, Wendy, Hunter, Ruth F., Laventure, Bob, McDonough, Suzanne M., Morgan, Joanne, Murphy, Marie H., Simpson, Ellen E. A., Tudor-Locke, Catrine, Wright, Ashlene, and Kee, Frank
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Exploring influences on evaluation practice: a case study of a national physical activity programme.
- Author
-
Fynn, Judith F., Hardeman, Wendy, Milton, Karen, and Jones, Andy
- Subjects
- *
EVALUATION , *HEALTH promotion , *INTERVIEWING , *RESEARCH methodology , *THEMATIC analysis , *PHYSICAL activity , *EVALUATION of human services programs - Abstract
Background: Interventions to improve physical activity behaviour are a core part of public health policy and practice. It is essential that we evaluate these interventions and use the evidence to inform decisions to improve population health. Evaluation of 'real-world' interventions provide an opportunity to generate practice-relevant evidence, however these interventions are difficult to evaluate. Various guidelines have been developed to facilitate evaluation, but evidence about their effectiveness in practice is limited. To explore influences on evaluation practice in an applied context, we conducted a case study of Sport England's 'Get Healthy Get Active' (GHGA) programme. This was a national programme that funded 33 projects that were delivered and evaluated across England. The programme was chosen as it was designed to generate evidence on the role of sport in increasing physical activity and improving health. The study aimed to explore and appraise whether strategies intended to facilitate project evaluation, including funder requirements to use a standardised evaluation framework and specific data collection methods, were effective in generating evidence that enabled the programme to meet its aims. Methods: We applied a collective case study design involving 35 semi-structured interviews, and documentary analysis of multiple sources of evidence from 23 physical activity projects funded by GHGA. We applied thematic and framework analysis. We developed a logic model and mapped actual outcomes against intended outcomes. A narrative synthesis is provided. We discuss implications for the effective commissioning and evaluation of public health interventions. Results: We identified five main themes of influences on evaluation practices that can act as barriers and facilitators to good practice: programme and project design; evaluation design; partnerships; resources; and organisational structures and systems. These influences are context-specific and operate through a complex set of interactions. Conclusion: Developing a better understanding of how influences on evaluation practice can act as facilitators or barriers is vital to help close current gaps in the evidence-based practice cycle. Critically, organisational structures and systems are needed to facilitate collaborative decision making; integration of projects and evaluation across partners organisations; transfer of knowldege and insights between stakeholders; and more rapid feedback and dissemination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. A randomised controlled trial of three very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care.
- Author
-
Pears, Sally, Bijker, Maaike, Morton, Katie, Vasconcelos, Joana, Parker, Richard A., Westgate, Kate, Brage, Soren, Wilson, Ed, Prevost, A. Toby, Kinmonth, Ann-Louise, Griffin, Simon, Sutton, Stephen, and Hardeman, Wendy
- Subjects
PRIMARY care ,PHYSICAL activity ,MEDICAL care costs ,HEALTH outcome assessment ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials - Abstract
Background: Very brief interventions (VBIs) for physical activity are promising, but there is uncertainty about their potential effectiveness and cost. We assessed potential efficacy, feasibility, acceptability, and cost of three VBIs in primary care, in order to select the most promising intervention for evaluation in a subsequent large-scale RCT. Methods: Three hundred and ninety four adults aged 40-74 years were randomised to a Motivational (n = 83), Pedometer (n = 74), or Combined (n = 80) intervention, delivered immediately after a preventative health check in primary care, or control (Health Check only; n = 157). Potential efficacy was measured as the probability of a positive difference between an intervention arm and the control arm in mean physical activity, measured by accelerometry at 4 weeks. Results: For the primary outcome the estimated effect sizes (95% CI) relative to the Control arm for the Motivational, Pedometer and Combined arms were respectively: +20.3 (-45.0, +85.7), +23.5 (-51.3, +98.3), and -3.1 (-69.3, +63.1) counts per minute. There was a73% probability of a positive effect on physical activity for each of the Motivational and Pedometer VBIs relative to control, but only 46% for the Combined VBI. Only the Pedometer VBI was deliverable within 5 min. All VBIs were acceptable and low cost. Conclusions: Based on the four criteria, the Pedometer VBI was selected for evaluation in a large-scale trial. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a very brief physical activity intervention delivered in NHS Health Checks (VBI Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Mitchell, Joanna, Hardeman, Wendy, Pears, Sally, Vasconcelos, Joana C., Prevost, A. Toby, Wilson, Ed, Sutton, Stephen, and VBI Research Team
- Subjects
- *
PHYSICAL activity measurement , *PHYSICALLY active people , *COST effectiveness , *RANDOMIZED controlled trials , *HEALTH , *CARDIOVASCULAR disease prevention , *NATIONAL health services , *HEALTH self-care , *PATIENT education , *BEHAVIOR , *ACTIGRAPHY , *CARDIOVASCULAR diseases , *COMPARATIVE studies , *EXERCISE , *EXPERIMENTAL design , *HEALTH behavior , *HEALTH status indicators , *RESEARCH methodology , *MEDICAL care costs , *MEDICAL cooperation , *RESEARCH protocols , *PREVENTIVE health services , *RESEARCH , *PRIMARY health care , *TIME , *EVALUATION research , *TREATMENT effectiveness , *ECONOMICS , *EQUIPMENT & supplies , *PSYCHOLOGY - Abstract
Background: Physical activity interventions that are targeted at individuals can be effective in encouraging people to be more physically active. However, most such interventions are too long or complex and not scalable to the general population. This trial will test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a very brief physical activity intervention when delivered as part of preventative health checks in primary care (National Health Service (NHS) Health Check).Methods/design: The Very Brief Intervention (VBI) Trial is a two parallel-group, randomised, controlled trial with 1:1 individual allocation and follow-up at 3 months. A total of 1,140 participants will be recruited from 23 primary care practices in the east of England. Participants eligible for an NHS Health Check and who are considered suitable to take part by their doctor and able to provide written informed consent are eligible for the trial. Participants are randomly assigned at the beginning of the NHS Health Check to either 1) the control arm, in which they receive only the NHS Health Check, or 2) the intervention arm, in which they receive the NHS Health Check plus 'Step It Up' (a very brief intervention that can be delivered in 5 minutes by nurses and/or healthcare assistants at the end of the Health Check). 'Step It Up' includes (1) a face-to-face discussion, including feedback on current activity level, recommendations for physical activity, and information on how to use a pedometer, set step goals, and monitor progress; (2) written material supporting the discussion and tips and links to further resources to help increase physical activity; and (3) a pedometer to wear and a step chart for monitoring progress. The primary outcome is accelerometer counts per minute at 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes include the time spent in the different levels of physical activity, self-reported physical activity and economic measures. Trial recruitment is underway.Discussion: The VBI trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Step It Up intervention delivered during NHS Health Checks and will inform policy decisions about introducing very brief interventions into routine primary care practice.Trial Registration: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN72691150 . Registered on 17 July 2014. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Reporting behaviour change interventions: do the behaviour change technique taxonomy v1, and training in its use, improve the quality of intervention descriptions?
- Author
-
Wood, Caroline E., Hardeman, Wendy, Johnston, Marie, Francis, Jill, Abraham, Charles, and Michie, Susan
- Subjects
- *
BEHAVIOR modification , *TAXONOMY , *INTERVENTION (Social services) , *RANDOMIZED controlled trials , *TRAINING , *BEHAVIOR therapy , *CLINICAL competence , *HEALTH behavior , *HEALTH promotion , *REPORT writing , *RESEARCH funding , *SMOKING cessation ,RESEARCH evaluation - Abstract
Background: Behaviour change interventions are likely to be reproducible only if reported clearly. We assessed whether the behaviour change technique taxonomy version 1 (BCTTv1), with and without training in identifying BCTs, improves the clarity and replicability of written reports of observed behaviour change interventions.Methods: Three studies assessed effects of using and training in the use of BCTTv1 on the clarity and replicability of intervention descriptions written after observing videos of smoking cessation interventions. Study 1 examined the effects of using and not using BCTTv1. Study 2 examined the effects of using BCTTv1 and training in use of BCTTv1 compared no use and no training. Study 3 employed a within-group design to assess change in descriptions written before and after training. One-hundred and 66 'writers' watched videos of behaviour change interventions and wrote descriptions of the active components delivered. In all studies, the participants' written descriptions were evaluated by (i) 12 'raters' (untrained in BCTTv1) for clarity and replicability and (ii) 12 'coders' (trained in BCTTv1) for reliability of BCT coding. Writers rated the usability and accessibility of using BCTTv1 to write descriptions.Results: Ratings of clarity and replicability did not differ between groups in study 1 (all ps > 0.05), were poorer for trained users in study 2 (all ps < 0.01) and improved following training in study 3 (all ps < 0.05). BCT identification was more reliable from descriptions written by trained BCTTv1 users (p < 0.05; study 2) but not simple use of BCTTv1 (p = 0.93; study 1) or by writers who had written a description without BCTTv1, before training (p = 0.50; study 3). Writers reported that using BCTTv1 was difficult but 'useful', 'good' and 'desirable' and that their descriptions would be clear and replicable (all means above mid-point of the scale).Conclusions: Effects of training to use BCTTv1 on the quality of written reports of observed interventions were mixed, with some suggestion of improved clarity and replicability of reporting in the within- (study 3) but not the between-group studies (studies 1 and 2). Potential benefits of using BCTTv1 may have been limited by the artificial nature and time constraints of the task. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Effectiveness of a behavioural intervention to prevent excessive weight gain during infancy (The Baby Milk Trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Lakshman, Rajalakshmi, Whittle, Fiona, Hardeman, Wendy, Suhrcke, Marc, Wilson, Ed, Griffin, Simon, and Ong, Ken K.
- Subjects
PREVENTION of childhood obesity ,BEHAVIOR modification ,INFANT formulas ,BREASTFEEDING ,ANTHROPOMETRY ,RESEARCH protocols ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,ADAPTABILITY (Personality) ,APPETITE ,BEHAVIOR therapy ,BOTTLE feeding ,CHILD development ,COGNITION ,COMPARATIVE studies ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,FOOD habits ,HEALTH attitudes ,INFANT psychology ,INTENTION ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,PSYCHOLOGY of mothers ,CHILDHOOD obesity ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH funding ,TIME ,WEIGHT gain ,EVALUATION research ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,NUTRITIONAL status - Abstract
Background: Infancy is a period of rapid growth and habit formation and hence could be a critical period for obesity prevention. Excess weight gain during infancy is associated with later obesity and formula-fed babies are more likely to gain excess weight compared to breastfed babies. The primary trial outcome is a change in the weight standard deviation score from birth to 1 year.Methods/design: We will recruit 650 to 700 parents who introduce formula-milk feeds within 14 weeks of their baby's birth to a single (assessor) blind, parallel group, individually randomised controlled trial. The focus of the intervention is the caregiver (usually the mother), and the focus of the primary outcome is the infant. The intervention group will receive the behavioural intervention, which aims to reduce formula-milk intake, promote responsive feeding and healthy weaning, and prevent excessive weight gain during infancy. The intervention is based on Social Cognitive Theory and action planning ('implementation intentions'). It consists of three components: (1) a motivational component to strengthen parents' motivation to follow the Baby Milk feeding guidelines, (2) an action planning component to help translate motivation into action, and (3) a coping planning component to help parents deal with difficult situations. It will be delivered by trained facilitators (research nurses) over 6 months through three face-to-face contacts, two telephone contacts and written materials. The control group will have the same number of contacts with facilitators, and general issues about feeding will be discussed. Anthropometric outcomes will be measured by trained research staff, blind to group allocation, at baseline, 6 months and 12 months following standard operating procedures. Validated questionnaires will assess milk intake, temperament, appetite, sleep, maternal quality of life and maternal psychological factors. A 4-day food diary will be completed at 8 months.Discussion: The results of the trial will help to inform infant feeding guidelines and to understand the links between infant feeding, behaviour, appetite and growth.Trial Registration: ISRTCN20814693 . Registration date 13 January 2011. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. PRomotion Of Physical activity through structured Education with differing Levels of ongoing Support for people at high risk of type 2 diabetes (PROPELS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
- Author
-
Yates, Tom, Griffin, Simon, Bodicoat, Danielle H., Brierly, Gwen, Dallosso, Helen, Davies, Melanie J., Eborall, Helen, Edwardson, Charlotte, Gillett, Mike, Gray, Laura, Hardeman, Wendy, Hill, Sian, Morton, Katie, Sutton, Stephen, Troughton, Jacqui, and Khunti, Kamlesh
- Subjects
ROBOTICS in education ,MENTAL discipline ,EDUCATIONAL literature ,DIFFERENTIAL psychology ,MEDICAL care accountability ,TYPE 2 diabetes diagnosis ,TYPE 2 diabetes prevention ,ASIANS ,BEHAVIOR ,COMPARATIVE studies ,EXERCISE ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,HEALTH attitudes ,HEALTH promotion ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,MOTOR ability ,TYPE 2 diabetes ,PAMPHLETS ,PATIENT education ,PROBABILITY theory ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH funding ,RISK assessment ,TELEPHONES ,TIME ,WHITE people ,TEXT messages ,EVALUATION research ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,SEDENTARY lifestyles ,EVALUATION of human services programs - Abstract
Background: The prevention of type 2 diabetes is recognised as a health care priority. Lifestyle change has proven effective at reducing the risk of type 2 diabetes, but limitations in the current evidence have been identified in: the promotion of physical activity; availability of interventions that are suitable for commissioning and implementation; availability of evidence-based interventions using new technologies; and physical activity promotion among ethnic minorities. We aim to investigate whether a structured education programme with differing levels of ongoing support, including text-messaging, can increase physical activity over a 4 year period in a multi-ethnic population at high risk of diabetes.Methods/design: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial, with follow-up at 12 and 48 months. The primary outcome is change in ambulatory activity at 48 months. Secondary outcomes include changes to markers of metabolic, cardiovascular, anthropometric and psychological health along with cost-effectiveness. Participants aged 40-74 years for White European, or 25-74 years for South Asians, with an HbA1c value of between 6.0 and < 6.4% (42 and 47 mmol/mol) or with a previously recorded plasma glucose level or HbA1c value within the high risk (prediabetes) range within the last five years, are invited to take part in the trial. Participants are identified through primary care, using an automated diabetes risk score within their practice database, or from a database of previous research participants. Participants are randomly assigned to either: 1) the control group who receive a detailed advice leaflet; 2) the Walking Away group, who receive the same leaflet and attend a 3 hour structured education programme with annual maintenance sessions delivered in groups; or 3) the Walking Away Plus group, who receive the leaflet, attend the structured education programme with annual maintenance sessions, plus receive follow-on support through highly-tailored text-messaging and telephone calls to help to aid pedometer use and behaviour change.Discussion: This study will provide new evidence for the long-term effectiveness of a structured education programme focused on physical activity, conducted within routine care in a multi-ethnic population in the UK. It will also investigate the impact of different levels of ongoing support and the cost-effectiveness of each intervention.Trial Registration: ISRCTN83465245 Trial registration date: 14/06/2012. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Development and feasibility study of very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care.
- Author
-
Pears, Sally, Morton, Katie, Bijker, Maaike, Sutton, Stephen, and Hardeman, Wendy
- Subjects
HEALTH care intervention (Social services) ,PHYSICAL activity ,PRIMARY care ,PUBLIC health ,BEHAVIOR modification ,HEALTH promotion ,BOOKLET Category Test - Abstract
Background: There is increasing interest in brief and very brief behaviour change interventions for physical activity as they are potentially scalable to the population level. However, few very brief interventions (VBIs) have been published, and evidence is lacking about their feasibility, acceptability and which 'active ingredients' (behaviour change techniques) would maximise their effectiveness. The aim of this research was to identify and develop promising VBIs for physical activity and test their feasibility and acceptability in the context of preventive health checks in primary care. Methods: The process included two stages, guided by four criteria: effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability, and cost. In Stage 1, we used an iterative approach informed by systematic reviews, a scoping review of BCTs, team discussion, stakeholder consultation, a qualitative study, and cost estimation to guide the development of promising VBIs. In Stage 2, a feasibility study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of the short-listed VBIs, using tape-recordings and interviews with practitioners (n = 4) and patients (n = 68), to decide which VBIs merited further evaluation in a pilot trial. Results: Four VBIs were short-listed: Motivational intervention; Action Planning intervention; Pedometer intervention; and Physical Activity Diary intervention. All were deliverable in around five minutes and were feasible and acceptable to participants and practitioners. Based on the results of interviews with practitioners and patients, techniques from the VBIs were combined into three new VBIs for further evaluation in a pilot trial. Conclusions: Using a two-stage approach, in which we considered the practicability of VBIs (acceptability, feasibility and cost) alongside potential efficacy from the outset, we developed a short-list of four promising VBIs for physical activity and demonstrated that they were acceptable and feasible as part of a preventive health check in primary care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Implementation of a nurse-led behaviour change intervention to support medication taking in type 2 diabetes: beyond hypothesised active ingredients (SAMS Consultation Study).
- Author
-
Hardeman, Wendy, Lamming, Laura, Kellar, Ian, De Simoni, Anna, Graffy, Jonathan, Boase, Sue, Sutton, Stephen, Farmer, Andrew, and Kinmonth, Ann Louise
- Subjects
- *
TYPE 2 diabetes , *NURSES , *NURSE-patient relationships , *MEDICAL care , *PATIENT-centered care , *MEDICAL communication - Abstract
Background Implementation of trial interventions is rarely assessed, despite its effects on findings. We assessed the implementation of a nurse-led intervention to facilitate medication adherence in type 2 diabetes (SAMS) in a trial against standard care in general practice. The intervention increased adherence, but not through the hypothesised psychological mechanism. This study aimed to develop a reliable coding frame for tape-recorded consultations, assessing both a priori hypothesised and potential active ingredients observed during implementation, and to describe the delivery and receipt of intervention and standard care components to understand how the intervention might have worked. Methods 211 patients were randomised to intervention or comparison groups and 194/211 consultations were tape-recorded. Practice nurses delivered standard care to all patients and motivational and action planning (implementation intention) techniques to intervention patients only. The coding frame was developed and piloted iteratively on selected tape recordings until a priori reliability thresholds were achieved. All tape-recorded consultations were coded and a random subsample double-coded. Results Nurse communication, nurse-patient relationship and patient responses were identified as potential active ingredients over and above the a priori hypothesised techniques. The coding frame proved reliable. Intervention and standard care were clearly differentiated. Nurse protocol adherence was good (M (SD) = 3.95 (0.91)) and competence of intervention delivery moderate (M (SD) = 3.15 (1.01)). Nurses frequently reinforced positive beliefs about taking medication (e.g., 65% for advantages) but rarely prompted problem solving of negative beliefs (e.g., 21% for barriers). Patients' action plans were virtually identical to current routines. Nurses showed significantly less patient-centred communication with the intervention than comparison group. Conclusions It is feasible to reliably assess the implementation of behaviour change interventions in clinical practice. The main study results could not be explained by poor delivery of motivational and action planning components, definition of new action plans, improved problem solving or patient-centred communication. Possible mechanisms of increased medication adherence include spending more time discussing it and mental rehearsal of successful performance of current routines, combined with action planning. Delivery of a new behaviour change intervention may lead to less patient-centred communication and possible reduction in overall trial effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Predictors of change in objectively measured and self-reported health behaviours among individuals with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes: longitudinal results from the ADDITION-Plus trial cohort.
- Author
-
Kuznetsov, Laura, Simmons, Rebecca K., Sutton, Stephen, Kinmonth, Ann-Louise, Griffin, Simon J., and Hardeman, Wendy
- Subjects
ACCELEROMETERS ,ANTHROPOMETRY ,BEHAVIOR modification ,BLOOD pressure ,CHOLESTEROL ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,STATISTICAL correlation ,PEOPLE with diabetes ,EPIDEMIOLOGY ,FOOD habits ,HEALTH behavior ,LONGITUDINAL method ,MULTIVARIATE analysis ,TYPE 2 diabetes ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,REGRESSION analysis ,RESEARCH funding ,SCALE analysis (Psychology) ,SELF-evaluation ,T-test (Statistics) ,DATA analysis ,SOCIOECONOMIC factors ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,PLANNED behavior theory ,PHYSICAL activity ,DATA analysis software ,STATE-Trait Anxiety Inventory ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
Background There is limited evidence about predictors of health behaviour change in people with type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study was to assess change in health behaviours over one year and to identify predictors of behaviour change among adults with screen-detected and recently clinically diagnosed diabetes. Methods ADDITION-Plus was a randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change intervention among 478 patients (40-69 years). Physical activity and diet were measured objectively (physical activity at 1 year) and by self-report at baseline and one year. Associations between baseline predictors and behaviour change were quantified using multivariable linear regression. Results Participants increased their plasma vitamin C and fruit intake, reduced energy and fat intake from baseline to follow-up. Younger age, male sex, a smaller waist circumference, and a lower systolic blood pressure at baseline were associated with higher levels of objectively measured physical activity at one year. Greater increases in plasma vitamin C were observed in women (beta-coefficient [95% CI]: beta = −5.52 [−9.81, -1.22]) and in those with screen-detected diabetes (beta = 6.09 [1.74, 10.43]). Younger age predicted a greater reduction in fat (beta = −0.43 [−0.72, -0.13]) and energy intake (beta = −6.62 [−13.2, -0.05]). Patients with screen-detected diabetes (beta = 74.2 [27.92, 120.41]) reported a greater increase in fruit intake. There were no significant predictors of change in self-reported physical activity. Beliefs about behaviour change and diabetes did not predict behaviour change. Conclusions Older patients, men and those with a longer duration of diabetes may need more intensive support for dietary change. We recommend that future studies use objective measurement of health behaviours and that researchers add predictors beyond the individual level. Our results support a focus on establishing healthy lifestyle changes early in the diabetes disease trajectory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. An explanatory randomised controlled trial of a nurse-led, consultation-based intervention to support patients with adherence to taking glucose lowering medication for type 2 diabetes.
- Author
-
Farmer, Andrew, Hardeman, Wendy, Hughes, Dyfrig, Prevost, A. Toby, Youngsuk Kim, Craven, Anthea, Oke, Jason, Boase, Sue, Selwood, Mary, Kellar, Ian, Graffy, Jonathan, Griffin, Simon, Sutton, Stephen, and Kinmonth, Ann-Louise
- Subjects
- *
CONFIDENCE intervals , *DRUGS , *TYPE 2 diabetes , *PATIENT compliance , *PRIMARY health care , *QUESTIONNAIRES , *STATISTICAL power analysis , *SOCIAL support , *RANDOMIZED controlled trials , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
Background: Failure to take medication reduces the effectiveness of treatment leading to increased morbidity and mortality. We evaluated the efficacy of a consultation-based intervention to support objectively-assessed adherence to oral glucose lowering medication (OGLM) compared to usual care among people with type 2 diabetes. Methods: This was a parallel group randomised trial in adult patients with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c≥7.5% (58 mmol/mol), prescribed at least one OGLM. Participants were allocated to a clinic nurse delivered, innovative consultation-based intervention to strengthen patient motivation to take OGLM regularly and support medicine taking through action-plans, or to usual care. The primary outcome was the percentage of days on which the prescribed dose of medication was taken, measured objectively over 12 weeks with an electronic medication-monitoring device (TrackCap, Aardex, Switzerland). The primary analysis was intention-to-treat. Results: 211 patients were randomised between July 1, 2006 and November 30, 2008 in 13 British general practices (primary care clinics). Primary outcome data were available for 194 participants (91.9%). Mean (sd) percentage of adherent days was 77.4% (26.3) in the intervention group and 69.0% (30.8) in standard care (mean difference between groups 8.4%, 95% confidence interval 0.2% to 16.7%, p = 0.044). There was no significant adverse impact on functional status or treatment satisfaction. Conclusions: This well-specified, theory based intervention delivered in a single session of 30 min in primary care increased objectively measured medication adherence, with no adverse effect on treatment satisfaction. These findings justify a definitive trial of this approach to improving medication adherence over a longer period of time, with clinical and cost-effectiveness outcomes to inform clinical practice. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN30522359 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Strengthening evaluation and implementation by specifying components of behaviour change interventions: a study protocol.
- Author
-
Michie, Susan, Abraham, Charles, Eccles, Martin P., Francis, Jill J., Hardeman, Wendy, and Johnston, Marie
- Subjects
RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,CLINICAL pharmacology ,MEDICAL research ,CLINICAL trials ,PUBLIC health - Abstract
Background: The importance of behaviour change in improving health is illustrated by the increasing investment by funding bodies in the development and evaluation of complex interventions to change population, patient, and practitioner behaviours. The development of effective interventions is hampered by the absence of a nomenclature to specify and report their content. This limits the possibility of replicating effective interventions, synthesising evidence, and understanding the causal mechanisms underlying behaviour change. In contrast, biomedical interventions are precisely specified (e.g., the pharmacological 'ingredients' of prescribed drugs, their dose and frequency of administration). For most complex interventions, the precise 'ingredients' are unknown; descriptions (e. g., 'behavioural counseling') can mean different things to different researchers or implementers. The lack of a method for specifying complex interventions undermines the precision of evidence syntheses of effectiveness, posing a problem for secondary, as well as primary, research. We aim to develop a reliable method of specifying intervention components ('techniques') aimed at changing behaviour. Methods/Design: The research will be conducted in three phases. The first phase will develop the nomenclature. We will refine a preliminary list of techniques and definitions. Using a formal consensus method, experts will then define the key attributes of each technique and how it relates to, and differs from, others. They will evaluate the techniques and their definitions until they achieve an agreed-upon list of clearly defined, nonredundant techniques. The second phase will test the nomenclature. Trained experts (primary researchers and systematic reviewers), equipped with a coding manual and guidance, will use the nomenclature to code published descriptions of complex interventions. Reliability between experts, over time, and across types of users will be assessed. We will assess whether using the nomenclature to write intervention descriptions enhances the clarity and replicability of interventions. The third phase will develop a web-based users' resource of clearly specified and nonredundant techniques, which will aid the scientific understanding of, and development of, effective complex interventions. Dissemination throughout the project will be through stakeholder meetings, targeted multidisciplinary workshops, conference presentation, journal publication, and publication in an interactive web-based platform (a Wiki). Discussion: The development of a reliable method of specifying intervention components aimed at changing behaviour will strengthen the scientific basis for developing, evaluating, and reporting complex interventions. It will improve the precision of evidence syntheses of effectiveness, thus enhancing secondary, as well as primary, research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Development of a questionnaire to assess maternal attitudes towards infant growth and milk feeding practices.
- Author
-
Laksham, Rajalakshmi R, Landsbaugh, Jill R, Schiff, Annie, Hardeman, Wendy, Ong, Ken K, and Griffin, Simon J
- Published
- 2011
23. Development of a questionnaire to assess maternal attitudes towards infant growth and milk feeding practices.
- Author
-
Lakshman, Rajalakshmi R., Landsbaugh, Jill R., Schiff, Annie, Hardeman, Wendy, Ong, Ken K., and Griffin, Simon J.
- Subjects
PUBLIC health research ,PHYSICAL activity ,NUTRITION disorders ,BREASTFEEDING ,CHILDHOOD obesity ,INFANT growth - Abstract
Background: There is increasing recognition that public health strategies to prevent childhood obesity need to start early in life. Any behavioural interventions need to target maternal attitudes and infant feeding practices, This paper describes the development and preliminary validation of a questionnaire to assess maternal attitudes towards infant growth and milk feeding practices. Methods: We designed a 57-item (19 questions), self-administered questionnaire to measure the following four domains- 1) type of milk feeding, decision making and sources of advice; 2) frequency and quantity of milk feeds; 3) attitudes to infant feeding and growth; and 4) theory-based beliefs about following infant feeding recommendations. Forty mothers completed the questionnaire on two occasions six days apart (to assess testretest reliability) and then participated in a semi-structured, open-ended telephone interview covering the same domains (to assess criterion validity). Percentage agreement, Cohen's Kappas (for categorical variables) and Spearman's correlation coefficients (for continuous variables) were used to quantify reliability and validity. Internal consistency between theory-based constructs (self-efficacy, outcome expectancy and intention) was quantified by Chronbach's alpha. Results: Of the 57 questionnaire items 51 (89%) had percentage agreement above 70% indicating good test-retest reliability, and the remaining 6 items had moderate or substantial levels of agreement (kappa 0.41-0.68). Comparing questionnaire with interview coding (validity), percentage agreement was above 66% for 39/57 items (68%). Of the 16 items with percentage agreement below 66%, only five had kappa values below 0.20 (two items had insufficient interview responses). Internal consistency was 0.51, 0.79 and 0.90 for self-efficacy, outcome expectancy and intention respectively. Conclusions: This questionnaire could be a useful tool in understanding the determinants of infant feeding and the 'causal mechanism' of interventions that target infant feeding practices to prevent early obesity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Protocol for the ADDITION-Plus study: a randomised controlled trial of an individuallytailored behaviour change intervention among people with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes under intensive UK general practice care.
- Author
-
Griffin, Simon J., Simmons, Rebecca K., Williams, Kate M., Prevost, A. Toby, Hardeman, Wendy, Grant, Julie, Whittle, Fiona, Boase, Sue, Hobbis, Imogen, Brage, Soren, Westgate, Kate, Fanshawe, Tom, Sutton, Stephen, Wareham, Nicholas J., and Kinmonth, Ann Louise
- Subjects
PEOPLE with diabetes ,PRIMARY care ,SMOKING ,PHYSICAL activity - Abstract
Background: The increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes poses both clinical and public health challenges. Costeffective approaches to prevent progression of the disease in primary care are needed. Evidence suggests that intensive multifactorial interventions including medication and behaviour change can significantly reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among patients with established type 2 diabetes, and that patient education in selfmanagement can improve short-term outcomes. However, existing studies cannot isolate the effects of behavioural interventions promoting self-care from other aspects of intensive primary care management. The ADDITION-Plus trial was designed to address these issues among recently diagnosed patients in primary care over one year. Methods/Design: ADDITION-Plus is an explanatory randomised controlled trial of a facilitator-led, theory-based behaviour change intervention tailored to individuals with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. 34 practices in the East Anglia region participated. 478 patients with diabetes were individually randomised to receive (i) intensive treatment alone (n = 239), or (ii) intensive treatment plus the facilitator-led individual behaviour change intervention (n = 239). Facilitators taught patients key skills to facilitate change and maintenance of key behaviours (physical activity, dietary change, medication adherence and smoking), including goal setting, action planning, self-monitoring and building habits. The intervention was delivered over one year at the participant's surgery and included a one-hour introductory meeting followed by six 30-minute meetings and four brief telephone calls. Primary endpoints are physical activity energy expenditure (assessed by individually calibrated heart rate monitoring and movement sensing), change in objectively measured dietary intake (plasma vitamin C), medication adherence (plasma drug levels), and smoking status (plasma cotinine levels) at one year. We will undertake an intention-to-treat analysis of the effect of the intervention on these measures, an assessment of cost-effectiveness, and analyse predictors of behaviour change in the cohort. Discussion: The ADDITION-Plus trial will establish the medium-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of adding an externally facilitated intervention tailored to support change in multiple behaviours among intensively-treated individuals with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes in primary care. Results will inform policy recommendations concerning the management of patients early in the course of diabetes. Findings will also improve understanding of the factors influencing change in multiple behaviours, and their association with health outcomes. Trial registration: ISRCTN: ISRCTN99175498 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions.
- Author
-
Greaves, Colin J., Sheppard, Kate E., Abraham, Charles, Hardeman, Wendy, Roden, Michael, Evans, Philip H., and Schwarz, Peter
- Subjects
TYPE 2 diabetes ,PHYSICAL activity ,DIET ,WEIGHT loss ,PHYSICAL fitness - Abstract
Background: To develop more efficient programmes for promoting dietary and/or physical activity change (in order to prevent type 2 diabetes) it is critical to ensure that the intervention components and characteristics most strongly associated with effectiveness are included. The aim of this systematic review of reviews was to identify intervention components that are associated with increased change in diet and/or physical activity in individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Library were searched for systematic reviews of interventions targeting diet and/or physical activity in adults at risk of developing type 2 diabetes from 1998 to 2008. Two reviewers independently selected reviews and rated methodological quality. Individual analyses from reviews relating effectiveness to intervention components were extracted, graded for evidence quality and summarised. Results: Of 3856 identified articles, 30 met the inclusion criteria and 129 analyses related intervention components to effectiveness. These included causal analyses (based on randomisation of participants to different intervention conditions) and associative analyses (e.g. meta-regression). Overall, interventions produced clinically meaningful weight loss (3-5 kg at 12 months; 2-3 kg at 36 months) and increased physical activity (30-60 mins/week of moderate activity at 12-18 months). Based on causal analyses, intervention effectiveness was increased by engaging social support, targeting both diet and physical activity, and using well-defined/established behaviour change techniques. Increased effectiveness was also associated with increased contact frequency and using a specific cluster of "self-regulatory" behaviour change techniques (e.g. goal-setting, self-monitoring). No clear relationships were found between effectiveness and intervention setting, delivery mode, study population or delivery provider. Evidence on long-term effectiveness suggested the need for greater consideration of behaviour maintenance strategies. Conclusions: This comprehensive review of reviews identifies specific components which are associated with increased effectiveness in interventions to promote change in diet and/or physical activity. To maximise the efficiency of programmes for diabetes prevention, practitioners and commissioning organisations should consider including these components. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Overestimation of physical activity level is associated with lower BMI: a cross-sectional analysis.
- Author
-
Watkinson, Clare, van Sluijs, Esther M. F., Sutton, Stephen, Hardeman, Wendy, Corder, Kirsten, and Griffin, Simon J.
- Subjects
PHYSICAL activity ,HEALTH behavior ,PHYSICAL fitness ,EXERCISE ,REGRESSION analysis - Abstract
Background: Poor recognition of physical inactivity may be an important barrier to healthy behaviour change, but little is known about this phenomenon. We aimed to characterize a high-risk population according to the discrepancies between objective and self-rated physical activity (PA), defined as awareness. Methods: An exploratory cross-sectional analysis of PA awareness using baseline data collected from 365 ProActive participants between 2001 and 2003 in East Anglia, England. Self-rated PA was defined as 'active' or 'inactive' (assessed via questionnaire). Objective PA was defined according to achievement of guideline activity levels (=30 minutes or <30 minutes spent at least moderate intensity PA, assessed by heart rate monitoring). Four awareness groups were created: 'Realistic Actives', 'Realistic Inactives', 'Overestimators' and 'Underestimators'. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between awareness group and 17 personal, social and biological correlates. Results: 63.3% of participants (N = 231) were inactive according to objective measurement. Of these, 45.9% rated themselves as active ('Overestimators'). In a multiple logistic regression model adjusted for age and smoking, males (OR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.12, 3.98), those with lower BMI (OR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.84, 0.95), younger age at completion of full-time education (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.74, 0.93) and higher general health perception (OR = 1.02 CI = 1.00, 1.04) were more likely to overestimate their PA. Conclusions: Overestimation of PA is associated with favourable indicators of relative slimness and general health. Feedback about PA levels could help reverse misperceptions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Who will increase their physical activity? Predictorsof change in objectively measured physical activityover 12 months in the ProActive cohort.
- Author
-
Simmons, Rebecca K., van Sluijs, Esther M. F., Hardeman, Wendy, Sutton, Stephen, and Griffin, Simon J.
- Subjects
PHYSICAL fitness ,TYPE 2 diabetes ,PUBLIC health ,HUMAN physiology - Abstract
Background: The aim was to identify predictors of change in objectively measured physical activity over 12 months in the ProActive cohort to improve understanding of factors influencing change in physical activity. Methods: ProActive is a physical activity promotion trial that took place in Eastern England (1999-2004). 365 offspring of people with type 2 diabetes underwent measurement of physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) using heart rate monitoring, fitness, and anthropometric and biochemical status at baseline and 1 year (n = 321). Linear regression was used to quantify the associations between baseline demographic, clinical, psychosocial and behavioural variables and change in PAEE over 12 months. This study is registered as ISRCTN61323766. Results: ProActive participants significantly increased their PAEE by 0.6 kj/min (SD 4.2, p = 0.006) over one year, the equivalent of around 20 minutes brisk walking/day. Male sex and higher fitness at baseline predicted increase in PAEE. No significant associations were found for any other variables. Very few baseline demographic, clinical, psychosocial and behavioural predictors were associated with change in objectively measured physical activity. Conclusions: Traditional baseline determinants of self-reported physical activity targeted by behavioural interventions may be relatively weak predictors of change in objectively measured physical activity. Further research is needed to improve our understanding of factors influencing change in physical activity to inform the development and targeting of interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2010
28. Impact of a physical activity intervention program on cognitive predictors of behaviour among adults at risk of Type 2 diabetes (ProActive randomised controlled trial).
- Author
-
Hardeman, Wendy, Kinmonth, Ann Louise, Michie, Susan, and Sutton, Stephen
- Subjects
- *
HEALTH behavior , *PEOPLE with diabetes , *PLANNED behavior theory , *COGNITIVE testing , *PHYSICAL fitness research - Abstract
Background: In the ProActive Trial an intensive theory-based intervention program was no more effective than theory-based brief advice in increasing objectively measured physical activity among adults at risk of Type 2 diabetes. We aimed to illuminate these findings by assessing whether the intervention program changed cognitions about increasing activity, defined by the Theory of Planned Behaviour, in ways consistent with the theory. Methods: N = 365 sedentary participants aged 30-50 years with a parental history of Type 2 diabetes were randomised to brief advice alone or to brief advice plus the intervention program delivered face-to-face or by telephone. Questionnaires at baseline, 6 and 12 months assessed cognitions about becoming more physically active. Analysis of covariance was used to test intervention impact. Bootstrapping was used to test multiple mediation of intervention impact. Results: At 6 months, combined intervention groups (face-to-face and telephone) reported that they found increasing activity more enjoyable (affective attitude, d = .25), and they perceived more instrumental benefits (e.g., improving health) (d = .23) and more control (d = .32) over increasing activity than participants receiving brief advice alone. Stronger intentions (d = .50) in the intervention groups than the brief advice group at 6 months were partially explained by affective attitude and perceived control. At 12 months, intervention groups perceived more positive instrumental (d = .21) and affective benefits (d = .29) than brief advice participants. The intervention did not change perceived social pressure to increase activity. Conclusion: Lack of effect of the intervention program on physical activity over and above brief advice was consistent with limited and mostly small short-term effects on cognitions. Targeting affective benefits (e.g., enjoyment, social interaction) and addressing barriers to physical activity may strengthen intentions, but stronger intentions did not result in more behaviour change. More powerful interventions which induce large changes in TPB cognitions may be needed. Other interventions deserving further evaluation include theory-based brief advice, intensive measurement of physical and psychological factors, and monitoring of physical activity. Future research should consider a wider range of mediators of physical activity change, assess participants' use of self-regulatory strategies taught in the intervention, and conduct experimental studies or statistical modelling prior to trial evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Protocol for SAMS (Support and Advice for Medication Study): A randomised controlled trial of an intervention to support patients with type 2 diabetes with adherence to medication.
- Author
-
Farmer, Andrew J., Prevost, A. Toby, Hardeman, Wendy, Craven, Anthea, Sutton, Stephen, Griffin, Simon J., and Kinmonth, Ann-Louise
- Subjects
TREATMENT of diabetes ,DRUGS ,PATIENT compliance ,PRIMARY care ,OPERANT behavior - Abstract
Background: Although some interventions have been shown to improve adherence to medication for diabetes, results are not consistent. We have developed a theory-based intervention which we will evaluate in a well characterised population to test efficacy and guide future intervention development and trial design. Methods and Design: The SAMS (Supported Adherence to Medication Study) trial is a primary care based multi-centre randomised controlled trial among 200 patients with type 2 diabetes and an HbA1c of 7.5% or above. It is designed to evaluate the efficacy of a two-component motivational intervention based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour and volitional action planning to support medication adherence compared with standard care. The intervention is delivered by practice nurses. Nurses were trained using a workshop approach with role play and supervised using assessment of tape-recorded consultations. The trial has a two parallel groups design with an unbalanced three-to-two individual randomisation eight weeks after recruitment with twelve week follow-up. The primary outcome is medication adherence measured using an electronic medication monitor over 12 weeks and expressed as the difference between intervention and control in mean percentage of days on which the correct number of medication doses is taken. Subgroup analyses will explore impact of number of medications taken, age, HbA1c, and self-reported adherence at baseline on outcomes. The study also measures the effect of dispensing medication to trial participants packaged in the electronic medication-monitoring device compared with conventional medication packaging. This will be achieved through one-to-one randomisation at recruitment to these conditions with assessment of the difference between groups in self-report of medication adherence and change in mean HbA1c from baseline to eight weeks. Anonymised demographic data are collected on non-respondents. Central randomisation is carried out independently of trial coordination and practices using minimisation to adjust for selected confounders. Discussion: The SAMS intervention and trial design address weaknesses of previous research by recruitment from a well-characterised population, definition of a feasible theory based intervention to support medication taking and careful measurement to estimate and interpret efficacy. The results will inform practice and the design of a cost-effectiveness trial [ISRCTN30522359]. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2008
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. The ProActive trial protocol -- a randomised controlled trial of the efficacy of a family-based, domiciliary intervention programme to increase physical activity among individuals at high risk of diabetes [ISRCTN61323766].
- Author
-
Williams, Kate, Prevost, A. Toby, Griffin, Simon, Hardeman, Wendy, Hollingworth, William, Spiegelhalter, David, Sutton, Stephen, Ekelund, Ulf, Wareham, Nicholas, and Kinmonth, Ann Louise
- Subjects
PUBLIC health ,PHYSICAL fitness ,DISEASE risk factors ,OBESITY ,DIABETES - Abstract
Background: Increasing prevalence of obesity and disorders associated with sedentary living constitute a major global public health problem. While previous evaluations of interventions to increase physical activity have involved communities or individuals with established disease, less attention has been given to interventions for individuals at risk of disease. Methods/design: ProActive aims to evaluate the efficacy of a theoretical, evidence- and family-based intervention programme to increase physical activity in a sedentary population, defined as being at-risk through having a parental family history of diabetes. Primary care diabetes or family history registers were used to recruit 365 individuals aged 30-50 years, screened for activity level. Participants were assigned by central randomisation to three intervention programmes: brief written advice (comparison group), or a psychologically based behavioural change programme, delivered either by telephone (distance group) or face-to-face in the family home over one year. The protocol-driven intervention programme is delivered by trained facilitators, and aims to support increases in physical activity through the introduction and facilitation of a range of self-regulatory skills (e.g. goal setting). The primary outcome is daytime energy expenditure and its ratio to resting energy expenditure, measured at baseline and one year using individually calibrated heart rate monitoring. Secondary measures include self-report of individual and family activity, psychological mediators of behaviour change, physiological and biochemical correlates, acceptability, and costs, measured at baseline, six months and one year. The primary intention to treat analysis will compare groups at one-year post randomisation. Estimation of the impact on diabetes incidence will be modelled using data from a parallel ten-year cohort study using similar measures. Discussion: ProActive is the first efficacy trial of an intervention programme to promote physical activity in a defined high-risk group accessible through primary care. The intervention programme is based on psychological theory and evidence; it introduces and facilitates the use of self-regulatory skills to support behaviour change and maintenance. The trial addresses a range of methodological weaknesses in the field by careful specification and quality assurance of the intervention programme, precise characterisation of participants, year-long follow-up and objective measurement of physical activity. Due to report in 2005, ProActive will provide estimates of the extent to which this approach could assist at-risk groups who could benefit from changes in behaviours affecting health, and inform future pragmatic trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2004
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Erratum to: Development and feasibility study of very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care.
- Author
-
Pears, Sally, Morton, Katie, Bijker, Maaike, Sutton, Stephen, Hardeman, Wendy, and VBI Programme Team
- Subjects
PUBLISHED errata ,PERIODICAL articles ,PERIODICAL publishing ,PUBLICATIONS ,PUBLISHING - Abstract
Upon publication of this article [1] it has been noted that due to a technical error the publisher missed to include the Open Access Licence statement in the copyright line. The correct copyright line should have read: © 2015 Pears et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Protocol for the ADDITION-Plus study: a randomised controlled trial of an individually-tailored behaviour change intervention among people with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes under intensive UK general practice care.
- Author
-
Griffin, Simon J, Simmons, Rebecca K, Williams, Kate M, Prevost, A Toby, Hardeman, Wendy, Grant, Julie, Whittle, Fiona, Boase, Sue, Hobbis, Imogen, Brage, Soren, Westgate, Kate, Fanshawe, Tom, Sutton, Stephen, Wareham, Nicholas J, Kinmonth, Ann Louise, and ADDITION-Plus study team
- Abstract
Background: The increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes poses both clinical and public health challenges. Cost-effective approaches to prevent progression of the disease in primary care are needed. Evidence suggests that intensive multifactorial interventions including medication and behaviour change can significantly reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among patients with established type 2 diabetes, and that patient education in self-management can improve short-term outcomes. However, existing studies cannot isolate the effects of behavioural interventions promoting self-care from other aspects of intensive primary care management. The ADDITION-Plus trial was designed to address these issues among recently diagnosed patients in primary care over one year.Methods/design: ADDITION-Plus is an explanatory randomised controlled trial of a facilitator-led, theory-based behaviour change intervention tailored to individuals with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. 34 practices in the East Anglia region participated. 478 patients with diabetes were individually randomised to receive (i) intensive treatment alone (n = 239), or (ii) intensive treatment plus the facilitator-led individual behaviour change intervention (n = 239). Facilitators taught patients key skills to facilitate change and maintenance of key behaviours (physical activity, dietary change, medication adherence and smoking), including goal setting, action planning, self-monitoring and building habits. The intervention was delivered over one year at the participant's surgery and included a one-hour introductory meeting followed by six 30-minute meetings and four brief telephone calls. Primary endpoints are physical activity energy expenditure (assessed by individually calibrated heart rate monitoring and movement sensing), change in objectively measured dietary intake (plasma vitamin C), medication adherence (plasma drug levels), and smoking status (plasma cotinine levels) at one year. We will undertake an intention-to-treat analysis of the effect of the intervention on these measures, an assessment of cost-effectiveness, and analyse predictors of behaviour change in the cohort.Discussion: The ADDITION-Plus trial will establish the medium-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of adding an externally facilitated intervention tailored to support change in multiple behaviours among intensively-treated individuals with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes in primary care. Results will inform policy recommendations concerning the management of patients early in the course of diabetes. Findings will also improve understanding of the factors influencing change in multiple behaviours, and their association with health outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. A randomised controlled trial of three very brief interventions for physical activity in primary care
- Author
-
Simon J. Griffin, Richard A Parker, Stephen Sutton, Joana C. Vasconcelos, A T Prevost, Sally Pears, Wendy Hardeman, Ann Louise Kinmonth, Maaike Bijker, Katie L. Morton, Kate Westgate, Edward C. F. Wilson, Soren Brage, Hardeman, Wendy [0000-0002-6498-9407], Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository, Westgate, Kathryn Louise [0000-0002-0283-3562], Brage, Soren [0000-0002-1265-7355], Wilson, Edward Charles [0000-0002-8369-1577], and Griffin, Simon James [0000-0002-2157-4797]
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,VBI Programme Team ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Health Behavior ,Psychological intervention ,Physical activity ,Primary care ,Public Health And Health Services ,Health check ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Environmental health ,Behaviour change techniques ,Epidemiology ,medicine ,Humans ,Very brief interventions ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Exercise ,Public, Environmental & Occupational Health ,Motivation ,Public health ,Science & Technology ,Primary Health Care ,business.industry ,lcsh:Public aspects of medicine ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,lcsh:RA1-1270 ,030229 sport sciences ,Middle Aged ,Actigraphy ,Treatment Outcome ,Pedometer ,Physical therapy ,Feasibility Studies ,Health promotion ,Female ,Biostatistics ,business ,Life Sciences & Biomedicine ,Research Article - Abstract
$\textbf{Background}$ Very brief interventions (VBIs) for physical activity are promising, but there is uncertainty about their potential effectiveness and cost. We assessed potential efficacy, feasibility, acceptability, and cost of three VBIs in primary care, in order to select the most promising intervention for evaluation in a subsequent large-scale RCT. $\textbf{Methods}$ Three hundred and ninety four adults aged 40–74 years were randomised to a Motivational ($\textit{n}$ = 83), Pedometer ($\textit{n}$ = 74), or Combined ($\textit{n}$ = 80) intervention, delivered immediately after a preventative health check in primary care, or control (Health Check only; $\textit{n}$ = 157). Potential efficacy was measured as the probability of a positive difference between an intervention arm and the control arm in mean physical activity, measured by accelerometry at 4 weeks. $\textbf{Results}$ For the primary outcome the estimated effect sizes (95 % CI) relative to the Control arm for the Motivational, Pedometer and Combined arms were respectively: +20.3 (−45.0, +85.7), +23.5 (−51.3, +98.3), and −3.1 (−69.3, +63.1) counts per minute. There was a73% probability of a positive effect on physical activity for each of the Motivational and Pedometer VBIs relative to control, but only 46 % for the Combined VBI. Only the Pedometer VBI was deliverable within 5 min. All VBIs were acceptable and low cost. $\textbf{Conclusions}$ Based on the four criteria, the Pedometer VBI was selected for evaluation in a large-scale trial. $\textbf{Trial registration}$ Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN02863077. Retrospectively registered 05/10/2012., This paper presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research Programme (Grant Reference Number RP-PG-0608-10079). ATP and JV were supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. The funder had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, the writing of the manuscript, and decision to submit the manuscript for publication., This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from BioMed Central via https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3684-7
- Published
- 2016
34. Who will increase their physical activity? Predictors of change in objectively measured physical activity over 12 months in the ProActive cohort.
- Author
-
Simmons RK, van Sluijs EM, Hardeman W, Sutton S, and Griffin SJ
- Subjects
- Adult, Anthropometry, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 prevention & control, England, Exercise psychology, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Promotion statistics & numerical data, Humans, Linear Models, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Fitness, Risk Factors, Sedentary Behavior, Attitude to Health, Exercise physiology, Health Promotion methods
- Abstract
Background: The aim was to identify predictors of change in objectively measured physical activity over 12 months in the ProActive cohort to improve understanding of factors influencing change in physical activity., Methods: ProActive is a physical activity promotion trial that took place in Eastern England (1999-2004). 365 offspring of people with type 2 diabetes underwent measurement of physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) using heart rate monitoring, fitness, and anthropometric and biochemical status at baseline and 1 year (n = 321). Linear regression was used to quantify the associations between baseline demographic, clinical, psychosocial and behavioural variables and change in PAEE over 12 months. This study is registered as ISRCTN61323766., Results: ProActive participants significantly increased their PAEE by 0.6 kj/min (SD 4.2, p = 0.006) over one year, the equivalent of around 20 minutes brisk walking/day. Male sex and higher fitness at baseline predicted increase in PAEE. No significant associations were found for any other variables. Very few baseline demographic, clinical, psychosocial and behavioural predictors were associated with change in objectively measured physical activity., Conclusions: Traditional baseline determinants of self-reported physical activity targeted by behavioural interventions may be relatively weak predictors of change in objectively measured physical activity. Further research is needed to improve our understanding of factors influencing change in physical activity to inform the development and targeting of interventions.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.