47 results on '"Hughes, Carmel"'
Search Results
2. Improving medication dispensing and counselling for patients with vision impairment: a qualitative study of pharmacist-reported barriers and facilitators
- Author
-
Kentab, Basma Y., Barry, Heather E., Al-Aqeel, Sinaa A., and Hughes, Carmel M.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Potentially inappropriate prescribing for people with dementia in ambulatory care: a cross-sectional observational study
- Author
-
Alageel, Nahla A., Hughes, Carmel M., Alwhaibi, Monira, Alkeridy, Walid, and Barry, Heather E.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Machine learning applications on neonatal sepsis treatment: a scoping review
- Author
-
O’Sullivan, Colleen, Tsai, Daniel Hsiang-Te, Wu, Ian Chang-Yen, Boselli, Emanuela, Hughes, Carmel, Padmanabhan, Deepak, and Hsia, Yingfen
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Antimicrobial resistance in urinary pathogens and culture-independent detection of trimethoprim resistance in urine from patients with urinary tract infection
- Author
-
Somorin, Yinka M., Weir, Nichola-Jane M., Pattison, Sally H., Crockard, Martin A., Hughes, Carmel M., Tunney, Michael M., and Gilpin, Deirdre F.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. An external pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of a theory-based intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care (PolyPrime)
- Author
-
Rankin, Audrey, Gorman, Ashleigh, Cole, Judith, Cadogan, Cathal A., Barry, Heather E., Agus, Ashley, Logan, Danielle, McDowell, Cliona, Molloy, Gerard J., Ryan, Cristín, Leathem, Claire, Maxwell, Marina, Brennan, Connie, Gormley, Gerard J., Ferrett, Alan, McCarthy, Pat, Fahey, Tom, and Hughes, Carmel M.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: a protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
- Author
-
Hynes, Lisa, Murphy, Andrew W., Hart, Nigel, Kirwan, Collette, Mulligan, Sarah, Leathem, Claire, McQuillan, Laura, Maxwell, Marina, Carr, Emma, Walkin, Scott, McCarthy, Caroline, Bradley, Colin, Byrne, Molly, Smith, Susan M., Hughes, Carmel, Corry, Maura, Kearney, Patricia M., McCarthy, Geraldine, Cupples, Margaret, Gillespie, Paddy, Newell, John, Glynn, Liam, Alvarez-Iglesias, Alberto, and Sinnott, Carol
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. The multimorbidity collaborative medication review and decision making (MyComrade) study: a pilot cluster randomised trial in two healthcare systems
- Author
-
Kirwan, Collette, Hynes, Lisa, Hart, Nigel, Mulligan, Sarah, Leathem, Claire, McQuillan, Laura, Maxwell, Marina, Carr, Emma, Roche, Kevin, Walkin, Scott, McCarthy, Caroline, Bradley, Colin, Byrne, Molly, Smith, Susan M., Hughes, Carmel, Corry, Maura, Kearney, Patricia M., McCarthy, Geraldine, Cupples, Margaret, Gillespie, Paddy, Hobbins, Anna, Newell, John, Glynn, Liam, Roshan, Davood, Sinnott, Carol, and Murphy, Andrew W.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. General practitioners’ experiences with, views of, and attitudes towards, general practice-based pharmacists: a cross-sectional survey
- Author
-
Hasan Ibrahim, Ameerah S., Barry, Heather E., and Hughes, Carmel M.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Hormone replacement therapy in women with cancer and risk of cancer-specific mortality and cardiovascular disease: a protocol for a cohort study from Scotland and Wales
- Author
-
McMenamin, Úna, Hicks, Blánaid, Hughes, Carmel, Murchie, Peter, Hippisley-Cox, Julia, Ranger, Tom, Coupland, Carol, and Cardwell, Chris
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials aimed at improving antimicrobial stewardship in care homes
- Author
-
Nguyen, Hoa Q., Bradley, Declan T., Tunney, Michael M., and Hughes, Carmel M.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Improving medicines management for people with dementia in primary care: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals to develop a theory-informed intervention
- Author
-
Barry, Heather E., Bedford, Laura E., McGrattan, Máiréad, Ryan, Cristín, Passmore, A. Peter, Robinson, A. Louise, Molloy, Gerard J., Darcy, Carmel M., Buchanan, Hilary, and Hughes, Carmel M.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Developing evidence-based guidance for assessment of suspected infections in care home residents
- Author
-
Hughes, Carmel, Ellard, David R., Campbell, Anne, Potter, Rachel, Shaw, Catherine, Gardner, Evie, Agus, Ashley, O’Reilly, Dermot, Underwood, Martin, Loeb, Mark, Stafford, Bob, and Tunney, Michael
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Does potentially inappropriate prescribing predict an increased risk of admission to hospital and mortality? A longitudinal study of the ‘oldest old’
- Author
-
Cardwell, Karen, Kerse, Ngaire, Hughes, Carmel M., Teh, Ruth, Moyes, Simon A., Menzies, Oliver, Rolleston, Anna, Broad, Joanna B., and Ryan, Cristín
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. The Care Home Independent Prescribing Pharmacist Study (CHIPPS)—a non-randomised feasibility study of independent pharmacist prescribing in care homes
- Author
-
Inch, Jacqueline, Notman, Frances, Bond, Christine M., Alldred, David P., Arthur, Antony, Blyth, Annie, Daffu-O’Reilly, Amrit, Ford, Joanna, Hughes, Carmel M., Maskrey, Vivienne, Millar, Anna, Myint, Phyo K., Poland, Fiona M., Shepstone, Lee, Zermansky, Arnold, Holland, Richard, Wright, David, and On behalf of the CHIPPS Team
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Family involvement in managing medications of older patients across transitions of care: a systematic review
- Author
-
Manias, Elizabeth, Bucknall, Tracey, Hughes, Carmel, Jorm, Christine, and Woodward-Kron, Robyn
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Machine learning applications on neonatal sepsis treatment: a scoping review.
- Author
-
O'Sullivan, Colleen, Tsai, Daniel Hsiang-Te, Wu, Ian Chang-Yen, Boselli, Emanuela, Hughes, Carmel, Padmanabhan, Deepak, and Hsia, Yingfen
- Subjects
NEONATAL sepsis ,MACHINE learning ,LEUKOCYTE count ,MULTIPLE organ failure ,NEONATAL infections - Abstract
Introduction: Neonatal sepsis is a major cause of health loss and mortality worldwide. Without proper treatment, neonatal sepsis can quickly develop into multisystem organ failure. However, the signs of neonatal sepsis are non-specific, and treatment is labour-intensive and expensive. Moreover, antimicrobial resistance is a significant threat globally, and it has been reported that over 70% of neonatal bloodstream infections are resistant to first-line antibiotic treatment. Machine learning is a potential tool to aid clinicians in diagnosing infections and in determining the most appropriate empiric antibiotic treatment, as has been demonstrated for adult populations. This review aimed to present the application of machine learning on neonatal sepsis treatment. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for studies published in English focusing on neonatal sepsis, antibiotics, and machine learning. Results: There were 18 studies included in this scoping review. Three studies focused on using machine learning in antibiotic treatment for bloodstream infections, one focused on predicting in-hospital mortality associated with neonatal sepsis, and the remaining studies focused on developing machine learning prediction models to diagnose possible sepsis cases. Gestational age, C-reactive protein levels, and white blood cell count were important predictors to diagnose neonatal sepsis. Age, weight, and days from hospital admission to blood sample taken were important to predict antibiotic-resistant infections. The best-performing machine learning models were random forest and neural networks. Conclusion: Despite the threat antimicrobial resistance poses, there was a lack of studies focusing on the use of machine learning for aiding empirical antibiotic treatment for neonatal sepsis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Low-dose aspirin use and survival in colorectal cancer: results from a population-based cohort study
- Author
-
Gray, Ronan T., Coleman, Helen G., Hughes, Carmel, Murray, Liam J., and Cardwell, Chris R.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Process evaluation for the Care Homes Independent Pharmacist Prescriber Study (CHIPPS).
- Author
-
Birt, Linda, Dalgarno, Lindsay, Wright, David J, Alharthi, Mohammed, Inch, Jackie, Spargo, Maureen, Blacklock, Jeanette, Poland, Fiona, Holland, Richard C, Alldred, David P., Hughes, Carmel M., Bond, Christine M., on behalf of the CHIPPS study team, Blyth, Annie, Watts, Laura, Daffu-O'Reilly, Amrit, and CHIPPS study team
- Abstract
Background: Medicines management in care homes requires significant improvement. CHIPPS was a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of integrating pharmacist independent prescribers into care homes to assume central responsibility for medicines management. This paper reports the parallel mixed-methods process evaluation.Method: Intervention arm consisted of 25 triads: Care homes (staff and up to 24 residents), General Practitioner (GP) and Pharmacist Independent Prescriber (PIP). Data sources were pharmaceutical care plans (PCPs), pharmacist activity logs, online questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Qualitative data were analysed thematically. Results were mapped to the process evaluation objectives following the Medical Research Council framework.Results: PCPs and activity logs were available from 22 PIPs. Questionnaires were returned by 16 PIPs, eight GPs, and two care home managers. Interviews were completed with 14 PIPs, eight GPs, nine care home managers, six care home staff, and one resident. All stakeholders reported some benefits from PIPs having responsibility for medicine management and identified no safety concerns. PIPs reported an increase in their knowledge and identified the value of having time to engage with care home staff and residents during reviews. The research paperwork was identified as least useful by many PIPs. PIPs conducted medication reviews on residents, recording 566 clinical interventions, many involving deprescribing; 93.8% of changes were sustained at 6 months. For 284 (50.2%) residents a medicine was stopped, and for a quarter of residents, changes involved a medicine linked to increased falls risk. Qualitative data indicated participants noted increased medication safety and improved resident quality of life. Contextual barriers to implementation were apparent in the few triads where PIP was not known previously to the GP and care home before the trial. In three triads, PIPs did not deliver the intervention.Conclusions: The intervention was generally implemented as intended, and well-received by most stakeholders. Whilst there was widespread deprescribing, contextual factors effected opportunity for PIP engagement in care homes. Implementation was most effective when communication pathways between PIP and GP had been previously well-established.Trial Registration: The definitive RCT was registered with the ISRCTN registry (registration number ISRCTN 17847169 ). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Protocol for a process evaluation of an external pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of a theory-based intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care: the PolyPrime study.
- Author
-
Rankin, Audrey, Molloy, Gerard J., Cadogan, Cathal A., Barry, Heather E., Gorman, Ashleigh, Ryan, Cristín, Ferrett, Alan, McCarthy, Pat, Gormley, Gerard J., Fahey, Tom, Hughes, Carmel M., and PolyPrime team
- Subjects
ELDER care ,POLYPHARMACY ,FRAIL elderly ,OLDER patients ,OLDER people ,PRIMARY care ,DRUGSTORES ,PATIENT-centered medical homes - Abstract
Background: The PolyPrime intervention is a theory-based intervention aimed at improving appropriate polypharmacy in older people (aged ≥65 years) in primary care. The intervention consists of an online video which demonstrates how general practitioners (GPs) can prescribe appropriate polypharmacy during a consultation with an older patient and a patient recall process, whereby patients are invited to scheduled medication review consultations with GPs. The aim of the process evaluation is to further examine the implementation of the PolyPrime intervention in primary care. This will involve investigating whether the PolyPrime intervention can be delivered as intended across two healthcare systems, how acceptable the intervention is to GPs, practice staff and patients, and to identify the intervention's likely mechanisms of action.Methods: The PolyPrime study is an external pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) which aims to recruit 12 GP practices across Northern Ireland [NI] (n=6) and the six counties in the Republic of Ireland (ROI) that border NI (n=6). Practices have been randomised to intervention or usual care. An embedded process evaluation will assess intervention fidelity (i.e. was the intervention delivered as intended), acceptability of the intervention to GPs, practice staff and patients and potential mechanisms of action (i.e. what components of the intervention were perceived to be effective). Quantitative data will be collected from data collection forms completed by GPs and practice staff and a feedback questionnaire completed by patients from intervention arm practices, which will be analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data will be collected through semi-structured interviews with GPs and practice staff and audio-recordings of medication review appointments from the intervention arm practices which will be transcribed and analysed using the framework method. Quantitative and qualitative data will be triangulated to provide an overall assessment of intervention fidelity, intervention acceptability, and mechanisms of action.Discussion: This process evaluation will add to feasibility data from the pilot cRCT by providing evidence on the fidelity of implementing the intervention package across two healthcare systems, the acceptability of the intervention and potential mechanisms of action.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ISRCTN41009897 . Registered on 19 November 2019. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04181879 . Registered 02 December 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. An external pilot cluster randomised controlled trial of a theory-based intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care (PolyPrime): study protocol.
- Author
-
Rankin, Audrey, Cadogan, Cathal A., Barry, Heather E., Gardner, Evie, Agus, Ashley, Molloy, Gerard J., Gorman, Ashleigh, Ryan, Cristín, Leathem, Claire, Maxwell, Marina, Gormley, Gerard J., Ferrett, Alan, McCarthy, Pat, Fahey, Tom, and Hughes, Carmel M.
- Subjects
ELDER care ,POLYPHARMACY ,OLDER people ,OLDER patients ,QUALITY of life ,SPECIALTY pharmacies ,DRUGSTORES - Abstract
Background: The use of multiple medications (polypharmacy) is a concern in older people (≥65 years) and is associated with negative health outcomes. For older populations with multimorbidity, polypharmacy is the reality and the key challenge is ensuring appropriate polypharmacy (as opposed to inappropriate polypharmacy). This external pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) aims to further test a theory-based intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care in two jurisdictions, Northern Ireland (NI) and the Republic of Ireland (ROI). Methods: Twelve GP practices across NI (n=6) and the six counties in the ROI that border NI will be randomised to either the intervention or usual care group. Members of the research team have developed an intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change. The intervention consists of two components: (1) an online video which demonstrates how a GP may prescribe appropriate polypharmacy during a consultation with an older patient and (2) a patient recall process, whereby patients are invited to scheduled medication review consultations with GPs. Ten older patients receiving polypharmacy (≥4 medications) will be recruited per GP practice (n=120). GP practices allocated to the intervention arm will be asked to watch the online video and schedule medication reviews with patients on two occasions; an initial and a 6-month follow-up appointment. GP practices allocated to the control arm will continue to provide usual care to patients. The study will assess the feasibility of recruitment, retention and study procedures including collecting data on medication appropriateness (from GP records), quality of life and health service use (i.e. hospitalisations). An embedded process evaluation will assess intervention fidelity (i.e. was the intervention delivered as intended), acceptability of the intervention and potential mechanisms of action. Discussion: This pilot cRCT will provide evidence of the feasibility of a range of study parameters such as recruitment and retention, data collection procedures and the acceptability of the intervention. Pre-specified progression criteria will also be used to determine whether or not to proceed to a definitive cRCT. Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN41009897. Registered 19 November 2019. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04181879. Registered 02 December 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Barriers and facilitators of medicines reconciliation at transitions of care in Ireland – a qualitative study.
- Author
-
Redmond, Patrick, Munir, Khalid, Alabi, Oludare, Grimes, Tamasine, Clyne, Barbara, Hughes, Carmel, and Fahey, Tom
- Subjects
ATTITUDE (Psychology) ,COMMUNICATION ,CONCEPTUAL structures ,CONSULTANTS ,DECISION support systems ,DRUG prescribing ,HEALTH care teams ,HEALTH services accessibility ,HOSPITAL admission & discharge ,INFORMATION storage & retrieval systems ,MEDICAL databases ,INTERVIEWING ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL personnel ,MEDICATION errors ,PATIENTS ,PHARMACISTS ,GENERAL practitioners ,PHYSICIAN practice patterns ,QUALITATIVE research ,PSYCHOSOCIAL factors ,THEMATIC analysis ,DISCHARGE planning ,ATTITUDES of medical personnel ,MEDICATION reconciliation - Abstract
Background: Medication error at transitions of care is common. The implementation of medicines reconciliation processes to improve this issue has been recommended by many regulatory and safety organisations. The aim of this study was to gain insight from healthcare professionals on the barriers and facilitators to the medicines reconciliation implementation process. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Ireland with a wide range of healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved with medicines reconciliation at transitions of care. Thematic analysis was undertaken using an adaptation of a combined theoretical framework of Grol, Cabana and Sluisveld to classify the barriers and facilitators to implementation of medicines reconciliation. Results: Thirty-five participants were interviewed, including eleven community pharmacists (CPs), eight hospital pharmacists (HPs), nine hospital consultants (HCs), five general practitioners (GPs), and two non-consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs). Themes were categorized into barriers and facilitators. Barriers included resistance from existing professional cultures, staff interest and training, poor communication and minimal information and communications technology (ICT) support. Solutions (facilitators) suggested included supporting effective multidisciplinary teams, greater involvement of pharmacists in medicines reconciliation, ICT solutions (linked prescribing databases, decision support systems) and increased funding to provide additional (e.g. admission and discharge reconciliation) and more advanced services (e.g. community pharmacist delivered medicines use review). Conclusions: Medicines reconciliation is advocated as a solution to the known problem of medication error at transitions of care. This study identifies the key challenges and potential solutions that policy makers, managers and HCPs should consider when reviewing the practices and processes of medicines reconciliation in their own organisations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Protocol for the process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of independent pharmacist prescribing in care home: the CHIPPS study.
- Author
-
Bond, Christine M., Holland, Richard, Alldred, David P., Arthur, Antony, Barton, Garry, Birt, Linda, Blyth, Annie, Desborough, James, Ford, Joanna, Handford, Christine, Hill, Helen, Hughes, Carmel M., Maskrey, Vivienne, Massey, Kate, Myint, Phyo K., Norris, Nigel, Poland, Fiona M., Shepstone, Lee, Zermansky, Arnold, and Wright, David
- Subjects
HOMEWORK ,PHARMACISTS ,MEDICAL personnel ,GENERAL practitioners ,COST effectiveness ,DRUGSTORES - Abstract
Background: Prescribing, monitoring and administration of medicines in care homes could be improved. A cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) is ongoing to evaluate the effectiveness of an independent prescribing pharmacist assuming responsibility for medicines management in care homes compared to usual care.Aims and Objectives: To conduct a mixed-methods process evaluation of the RCT, in line with Medical Research Council (MRC) process evaluation guidance, to inform interpretation of main trial findings and if the service is found to be effective and efficient, to inform subsequent implementation.Objectives: 1. To describe the intervention as delivered in terms of quality, quantity, adaptations and variations across triads and time. 2. To explore the effects of individual intervention components on the primary outcomes. 3. To investigate the mechanisms of impact. 4. To describe the perceived effectiveness of relevant intervention components [including pharmacist independent prescriber (PIP) training and care home staff training] from participant [general practitioner (GP), care home, PIP and resident/relative] perspectives. 5. To describe the characteristics of GP, care home, PIP and resident participants to assess reach. 6. To estimate the extent to which intervention delivery is normalised among the intervention healthcare professionals and related practice staff.Methods: A mix of quantitative (surveys, record reviews) and qualitative (interviews) approaches will be used to collect data on the extent of the delivery of detailed tasks required to implement the new service, to collect data to confirm the mechanism of impact as hypothesised in the logic model, to collect explanatory process and final outcome data, and data on contextual factors which could have facilitated or hindered effective and efficient delivery of the service.Discussion: Recruitment is ongoing and the trial should complete in early 2020. The systematic and comprehensive approach that is being adopted will ensure data is captured on all aspects of the study, and allow a full understanding of the implementation of the service and the RCT findings. With so many interrelated factors involved it is important that a process evaluation is undertaken to enable us to identify which elements of the service were deemed to be effective, explain any differences seen, and identify enablers, barriers and future adaptions.Trial Registration: ISRCTN17847169. Date registered: 15 December 2017. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of independent pharmacist prescribing in care homes: the CHIPPS study.
- Author
-
Bond, Christine M., Holland, Richard, Alldred, David P., Arthur, Antony, Barton, Garry, Blyth, Annie, Desborough, James, Ford, Joanna, Handford, Christine, Hill, Helen, Hughes, Carmel M., Maskrey, Vivienne, Massey, Kate, Myint, Phyo K., Norris, Nigel, Poland, Fiona M., Shepstone, Lee, Turner, David, Zermansky, Arnold, and Wright, David
- Subjects
HOMEWORK ,PHARMACISTS ,DRUGSTORES ,NURSING care facilities ,HOME care services ,COST effectiveness ,QUALITY of life - Abstract
Background: Prescribing, monitoring and administration of medicines in care homes could be improved. Research has identified the need for one person to assume overall responsibility for the management of medicines within each care home. and shown that a pharmacist independent prescriber service is feasible in this context.Aims and Objectives: To conduct a cluster randomised controlled trial to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a pharmacist-independent prescribing service in care homes compared to usual general practitioner (GP)-led care.Objectives: To perform a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) with an internal pilot to determine the intervention's effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and enable modelling beyond the end of the trial.Methods: This protocol is for a cluster RCT with a 3-month internal pilot to confirm that recruitment is achievable, and there are no safety concerns. The unit of randomisation is a triad comprising a pharmacist-independent prescriber (PIP) based in a GP practice with sufficient registered patients resident in one or more care homes to allow recruitment of an average of 20 participants. In the intervention group, the PIP will, in collaboration with the GP: assume responsibility for prescribing and managing residents' medicines including medication review and pharmaceutical care planning; support systematic ordering and administration in the care home, GP practice and supplying pharmacy; train care home and GP practice staff; communicate with GP practice, care home, supplying community pharmacy and study team. The intervention will last 6 months. The primary outcome will be resident falls at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include resident health-related quality of life, falls at 3 months, medication burden, medication appropriateness, mortality and hospitalisations. A full health economic analysis will be undertaken. The target sample size is 880 residents (440) in each arm) from 44 triads. This number is sufficient to detect a decrease in fall rate from 1.5 per individual to 1.178 (relative reduction of 21%) with 80% power and an ICC of 0.05 or less.Discussion: Recruitment is on-going and the trial should complete in early 2020. The trial results will have implications for the future management of residents in care homes and the ongoing implementation of independent pharmacist prescribing.Trial Registration: ISRCTN, ID: 17847169. Registered on 15 December 2017. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Low-dose aspirin and survival from lung cancer: a population-based cohort study
- Author
-
McMenamin, Una C., Cardwell, Chris C., Hughes, Carmel M., and Murray, Liam M.
- Subjects
Adult ,Aged, 80 and over ,Male ,Cancer Research ,Lung Neoplasms ,Aspirin ,Low-dose aspirin ,Pharmacoepidemiology ,Antineoplastic Agents ,Lung cancer survival ,Middle Aged ,United Kingdom ,Cohort Studies ,SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being ,Oncology ,Case-Control Studies ,Genetics ,Humans ,CPRD ,Cyclooxygenase Inhibitors ,Female ,Research Article ,Aged - Abstract
BackgroundPreclinical evidence suggests that aspirin may inhibit lung cancer progression. In a large cohort of lung cancer patients, we investigated whether low-dose aspirin use was associated with a reduction in the risk of lung cancer-specific mortality.MethodsWe identified lung cancer patients from English cancer registries diagnosed between 1998 to 2009 from the National Cancer Data Repository. Medication usage was obtained from linkages to the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink and lung cancer-specific deaths were identified from Office of National Statistics mortality data. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for the association between low-dose aspirin use (before and after diagnosis) and risk of lung cancer-specific mortality were calculated using Cox regression models.ResultsA total of 14,735 lung cancer patients were identified during the study period. In analysis of 3,635 lung cancer patients, there was no suggestion of an association between low-dose aspirin use after diagnosis and cancer-specific mortality (adjusted HR = 0.96, 95 % CI: 0.85, 1.09). Similarly, no association was evident for low-dose aspirin use before diagnosis and cancer-specific mortality (adjusted HR = 1.00, 95 % CI: 0.95, 1.05). Associations were comparable by duration of use and for all-cause mortality.ConclusionOverall, we found little evidence of a protective association between low-dose aspirin use and cancer-specific mortality in a large population-based lung cancer cohort.
- Published
- 2015
26. 'It’s very complicated': a qualitative study of medicines management in intermediate care facilities in Northern Ireland
- Author
-
Millar, Anna N., Hughes, Carmel M., and Ryan, Cristín
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Health Policy ,education ,Pharmacy ,Northern Ireland ,Middle Aged ,Pharmacists ,Intermediate care ,Interviews as Topic ,SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being ,Pharmaceutical Services ,Humans ,Medicines management ,Female ,Patient Care ,Older people ,Qualitative ,Intermediate Care Facilities ,Qualitative Research ,Research Article ,Aged - Abstract
Background: Intermediate care (IC) describes a range of services targeted at older people, aimed at preventing unnecessary hospitalisation, promoting faster recovery from illness and maximising independence. Older people are at increased risk of medication-related adverse events, but little is known about the provision of medicines management services in IC facilities. This study aimed to describe the current provision of medicines management services in IC facilities in Northern Ireland (NI) and to explore healthcare workers' (HCWs) and patients' views of, and attitudes towards these services and the IC concept. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted, recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a constant comparative approach with HCWs and patients from IC facilities in NI. Results: Interviews were conducted with 25 HCWs and 18 patients from 12 IC facilities in NI. Three themes were identified: 'concept and reality', 'setting and supply' and 'responsibility and review'. A mismatch between the concept of IC and the reality was evident. The IC facility setting dictated prescribing responsibilities and the supply of medicines, presenting challenges for HCWs. A lack of a standardised approach to responsibility for the provision of medicines management services including clinical review was identified. Whilst pharmacists were not considered part of the multidisciplinary team, most HCWs recognised a need for their input. Medicines management was not a concern for the majority of IC patients. Conclusions: Medicines management services are not integral to IC and medicine-related challenges are frequently encountered. Integration of pharmacists into the multidisciplinary team could potentially improve medicines management in IC.
- Published
- 2015
27. Supporting prescribing in older people with multimorbidity and significant polypharmacy in primary care (SPPiRE): a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol and pilot.
- Author
-
McCarthy, Caroline, Clyne, Barbara, Corrigan, Derek, Boland, Fiona, Wallace, Emma, Moriarty, Frank, Fahey, Tom, Hughes, Carmel, Gillespie, Paddy, and Smith, Susan M.
- Subjects
OLDER people ,COMORBIDITY ,PRIMARY care ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,POLYPHARMACY - Abstract
Background: Multimorbidity, defined as the presence of at least two chronic conditions, becomes increasingly common in older people and is associated with poorer health outcomes and significant polypharmacy. The National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) recently published a multimorbidity guideline that advises providing an individualised medication review for all people prescribed 15 or more repeat medicines. This study incorporates this guideline and aims to assess the effectiveness of a complex intervention designed to support general practitioners (GPs) to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing and consider deprescribing in older people with multimorbidity and significant polypharmacy in Irish primary care.Methods: This study is a cluster randomised controlled trial, involving 30 general practices and 450 patients throughout Ireland. Practices will be eligible to participate if they have at least 300 patients aged 65 years and over on their patient panel and if they use either one of the two predominant practice management software systems in use in Ireland. Using a software patient finder tool, practices will identify and recruit patients aged 65 years and over, who are prescribed at least 15 repeat medicines. Once baseline data collection is complete, practices will be randomised using minimisation by an independent third party to either intervention or control. Given the nature of the intervention, it is not possible to blind participants or study personnel. GPs in intervention practices will receive login details to a website where they will access training videos and a template for conducting an individualised structured medication review, which they will undertake with each of their included patients. Control practices will deliver usual care over the 6-month study period. Primary outcome measures pertain to the individual patient level and are the proportion of patients with any PIP and the number of repeat medicines.Discussion: Disease-specific approaches in multimorbidity may be inappropriate and result in fragmented and poorly co-ordinated care. This pragmatic study is evaluating a complex intervention that is relevant across multiple conditions and addresses potential concerns around medicines safety in this vulnerable group of patients. The potential for system-wide implementation will be explored with a parallel mixed methods process evaluation.Trial Registration: ISRCTN: 12752680 , Registered 20 October 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Development of a core outcome set for effectiveness trials aimed at optimising prescribing in older adults in care homes.
- Author
-
Millar, Anna N., Daffu-O'Reilly, Amrit, Hughes, Carmel M., Alldred, David P., Barton, Garry, Bond, Christine M., Desborough, James A., Myint, Phyo K., Holland, Richard, Poland, Fiona M., Wright, David, and CHIPPS Team, University of East Anglia
- Subjects
ELDER care ,DRUG prescribing ,NURSING home care ,DRUG side effects ,HOSPITAL admission & discharge ,CLINICAL trials ,CONSENSUS (Social sciences) ,DELPHI method ,DRUGSTORES ,EXPERIMENTAL design ,INTERPROFESSIONAL relations ,LONGITUDINAL method ,MEDICAL protocols ,MEDICAL prescriptions ,NURSING care facilities ,SENIOR housing ,STANDARDS - Abstract
Background: Prescribing medicines for older adults in care homes is known to be sub-optimal. Whilst trials testing interventions to optimise prescribing in this setting have been published, heterogeneity in outcome reporting has hindered comparison of interventions, thus limiting evidence synthesis. The aim of this study was to develop a core outcome set (COS), a list of outcomes which should be measured and reported, as a minimum, for all effectiveness trials involving optimising prescribing in care homes. The COS was developed as part of the Care Homes Independent Pharmacist Prescribing Study (CHIPPS).Methods: A long-list of outcomes was identified through a review of published literature and stakeholder input. Outcomes were reviewed and refined prior to entering a two-round online Delphi exercise and then distributed via a web link to the CHIPPS Management Team, a multidisciplinary team including pharmacists, doctors and Patient Public Involvement representatives (amongst others), who comprised the Delphi panel. The Delphi panellists (n = 19) rated the importance of outcomes on a 9-point Likert scale from 1 (not important) to 9 (critically important). Consensus for an outcome being included in the COS was defined as ≥70% participants scoring 7-9 and <15% scoring 1-3. Exclusion was defined as ≥70% scoring 1-3 and <15% 7-9. Individual and group scores were fed back to participants alongside the second questionnaire round, which included outcomes for which no consensus had been achieved.Results: A long-list of 63 potential outcomes was identified. Refinement of this long-list of outcomes resulted in 29 outcomes, which were included in the Delphi questionnaire (round 1). Following both rounds of the Delphi exercise, 13 outcomes (organised into seven overarching domains: medication appropriateness, adverse drug events, prescribing errors, falls, quality of life, all-cause mortality and admissions to hospital (and associated costs)) met the criteria for inclusion in the final COS.Conclusions: We have developed a COS for effectiveness trials aimed at optimising prescribing in older adults in care homes using robust methodology. Widespread adoption of this COS will facilitate evidence synthesis between trials. Future work should focus on evaluating appropriate tools for these key outcomes to further reduce heterogeneity in outcome measurement in this context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Development of an intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care using a theory-based method.
- Author
-
Cadogan, Cathal A., Ryan, Cristín, Francis, Jill J., Gormley, Gerard J., Passmore, Peter, Kerse, Ngaire, and Hughes, Carmel M.
- Subjects
POLYPHARMACY ,MEDICAL care for older people ,BEHAVIOR modification ,HEALTH care intervention (Social services) ,GENERAL practitioners ,PHARMACISTS - Abstract
Background: It is advocated that interventions to improve clinical practice should be developed using a systematic approach and intervention development methods should be reported. However, previous interventions aimed at ensuring that older people receive appropriate polypharmacy have lacked details on their development. This study formed part of a multiphase research project which aimed to develop an intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care. Methods: The target behaviours for the intervention were prescribing and dispensing of appropriate polypharmacy to older patients by general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists. Intervention development followed a systematic approach, including previous mapping of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) to key domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework that were perceived by GPs and pharmacists to influence the target behaviours. Draft interventions were developed to operationalise selected BCTs through team discussion. Selection of an intervention for feasibility testing was guided by a subset of the APEASE (Affordability, Practicability, Effectiveness/ cost-effectiveness, Acceptability, Side-effects/safety, Equity) criteria. Results: Three draft interventions comprising selected BCTs were developed, targeting patients, pharmacists and GPs, respectively. Following assessment of each intervention using a subset of the APEASE criteria (affordability, practicability, acceptability), the GP-targeted intervention was selected for feasibility testing. This intervention will involve a demonstration of the behaviour and will be delivered as an online video. The video demonstrating how GPs can prescribe appropriate polypharmacy during a typical consultation with an older patient will also demonstrate salience of consequences (feedback emphasising the positive outcomes of performing the behaviour). Action plans and prompts/cues will be used as complementary intervention components. The intervention is designed to facilitate the prescribing of appropriate polypharmacy in routine practice. Conclusion: A GP-targeted intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy in older people has been developed using a systematic approach. Intervention content has been specified using an established taxonomy of BCTs and selected to maximise feasibility. The results of a future feasibility study will help to determine if the theory-based intervention requires further refinement before progressing to a larger scale randomised evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. 'Potentially inappropriate or specifically appropriate?' Qualitative evaluation of general practitioners views on prescribing, polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people.
- Author
-
Clyne, Barbara, Cooper, Janine A., Hughes, Carmel M., Fahey, Tom, and Smith, Susan M.
- Subjects
GENERAL practitioners ,DRUG prescribing ,INTERVIEWING ,RESEARCH methodology ,PRIMARY health care ,RESEARCH funding ,PHYSICIAN practice patterns ,QUALITATIVE research ,DATA analysis ,QUANTITATIVE research ,ACQUISITION of data ,POLYPHARMACY ,INAPPROPRIATE prescribing (Medicine) - Abstract
Background: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is common in older people in primary care, as evidenced by a significant body of quantitative research. However, relatively few qualitative studies have investigated the phenomenon of PIP and its underlying processes from the perspective of general practitioners (GPs). The aim of this paper is to explore qualitatively, GP perspectives regarding prescribing and PIP in older primary care patients. Method: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with GPs participating in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of an intervention to decrease PIP in older patients (≥70 years) in Ireland. Interviews were conducted with GP participants (both intervention and control) from the OPTI-SCRIPT cluster RCT as part of the trial process evaluation between January and July 2013. Interviews were conducted by one interviewer and audio recorded. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and a thematic analysis was conducted. Results: Seventeen semi-structured interviews were conducted (13 male; 4 female). Three main, inter-related themes emerged (complex prescribing environment, paternalistic doctor-patient relationship, and relevance of PIP concept). Patient complexity (e.g. polypharmacy, multimorbidity), as well as prescriber complexity (e.g. multiple prescribers, poor communication, restricted autonomy) were all identified as factors contributing to a complex prescribing environment where PIP could occur, as was a paternalistic-doctor patient relationship. The concept of PIP was perceived to be of variable usefulness to GPs and the criteria to measure it may be at odds with the complex processes of prescribing for this patient population. Conclusions: Several inter-related factors contributing to the occurrence of PIP were identified, some of which may be amenable to intervention. Improvement strategies focused on improved management of polypharmacy and multimorbidity, and communication across primary and secondary care could result in substantial improvements in PIP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Statin use and breast cancer survival: a nationwide cohort study in Scotland.
- Author
-
Mc Menamin, Úna C., Murray, Liam J., Hughes, Carmel M., and Cardwell, Chris R.
- Subjects
BREAST cancer ,HUMAN anatomy ,HUMAN biology ,STATINS (Cardiovascular agents) ,ANTICHOLESTEREMIC agents ,ANTILIPEMIC agents ,SIMVASTATIN ,BREAST tumors ,LONGITUDINAL method ,PROPORTIONAL hazards models ,RETROSPECTIVE studies ,THERAPEUTICS - Abstract
Background: Preclinical evidence suggests that statins could delay cancer progression. Previous epidemiological findings have been inconsistent and some have been limited by small sample sizes, as well as certain time-related biases. This study aimed to investigate whether breast cancer patients who were exposed to statins had reduced breast cancer-specific mortality.Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 15,140 newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer patients diagnosed from 2009 to 2012 within the Scottish Cancer Registry. Dispensed medication usage was obtained from linkages to the Scottish Prescribing Information System and breast cancer-specific deaths were identified from National Records of Scotland Death Records. Using time-dependent Cox regression models, hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the association between post-diagnostic exposure to statins (including simvastatin) and breast cancer-specific mortality. Adjustments were made for a range of potential confounders including age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, cancer stage, grade, cancer treatments received, comorbidities, socioeconomic status and use of aspirin.Results: A total of 1,190 breast cancer-specific deaths occurred up to January 2015. Overall, after adjustment for potential confounders, there was no evidence of an association between statin use and breast cancer-specific death (adjusted HR 0.93, 95 % CI 0.77, 1.12). No significant associations were observed in dose-response analyses or in analysis of all-cause mortality. For simvastatin use specifically, a weak non-significant reduction in breast cancer-specific mortality was observed compared to non-users (adjusted HR 0.89, 95 % CI 0.73, 1.08). Statin use before diagnosis was weakly associated with a reduction in breast cancer-specific mortality (adjusted HR 0.85, 95 % CI 0.74, 0.98).Conclusion: Overall, we found little evidence of a protective association between post-diagnostic statin use and cancer-specific mortality in a large nation-wide cohort of breast cancer patients. These findings will help inform the decision whether to conduct randomised controlled trials of statins as an adjuvant treatment in breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. A process evaluation of a cluster randomised trial to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people in primary care (OPTI-SCRIPT study).
- Author
-
Clyne, Barbara, Cooper, Janine A., Hughes, Carmel M., Fahey, Tom, Smith, Susan M., and OPTI-SCRIPT study team
- Subjects
INAPPROPRIATE prescribing (Medicine) ,OLDER patients ,PRIMARY care ,GENERAL practitioners ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,THEMATIC analysis - Abstract
Background: The OPTI-SCRIPT cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) found that a three-phase multifaceted intervention including academic detailing with a pharmacist, GP-led medicines reviews, supported by web-based pharmaceutical treatment algorithms, and tailored patient information leaflets, was effective in reducing potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in Irish primary care. We report a process evaluation exploring the implementation of the intervention, the experiences of those participating in the study and lessons for future implementation.Methods: The OPTI-SCRIPT trial included 21 GP practices and 196 patients. The process evaluation used mixed methods. Quantitative data were collected from all GP practices and semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs from intervention and control groups, and a purposive sample of patients from the intervention group. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic analysis.Results: Despite receiving a standardised academic detailing session, intervention delivery varied among GP practices. Just over 70 % of practices completed medicines review as recommended with the patient present. Only single-handed practices conducted reviews without patients present, highlighting the influence of practice characteristics and resources on variation. Medications were more likely to be completely stopped or switched to another more appropriate medication when reviews were conducted with patients present. The patient information leaflets were not used by any of the intervention practices. Both GP (32 %) and patient (40 %) recruitment rates were modest. For those who did participate, overall, the experience was positively viewed, with GPs and patients referring to the value of medication reviews to improve prescribing and reduce unnecessary medications. Lack of time in busy GP practices and remuneration were identified as organisational barriers to future implementation.Conclusions: The OPTI-SCRIPT intervention was positively viewed by both GPs and patients, both of whom valued the study's objectives. Patient information leaflets were not a successful component of the intervention. Academic detailing and medication reviews are important components in changing PIP, and having patients present during the review process seems to be a more effective approach for decreasing PIP.Trial Registration: Current controlled trials ISRCTN41694007 . Registered on 21 March 2012. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Sustained effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients in primary care (OPTI-SCRIPT study).
- Author
-
Clyne, Barbara, Smith, Susan M., Hughes, Carmel M., Boland, Fiona, Cooper, Janine A., Fahey, Tom, and OPTI-SCRIPT study team
- Subjects
PRIMARY health care ,OLDER patients ,DRUG side effects ,DRUG prescribing ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,CLUSTER analysis (Statistics) ,COMPARATIVE studies ,LONGITUDINAL method ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,RESEARCH ,EVALUATION research ,EVALUATION of human services programs ,INAPPROPRIATE prescribing (Medicine) ,PREVENTION - Abstract
Background: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is common in older people in primary care and can result in increased morbidity, adverse drug events and hospitalisations. We previously demonstrated the success of a multifaceted intervention in decreasing PIP in primary care in a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT).Objective: We sought to determine whether the improvement in PIP in the short term was sustained at 1-year follow-up.Methods: A cluster RCT was conducted with 21 GP practices and 196 patients (aged ≥70) with PIP in Irish primary care. Intervention participants received a complex multifaceted intervention incorporating academic detailing, medicine review with web-based pharmaceutical treatment algorithms that provide recommended alternative treatment options, and tailored patient information leaflets. Control practices delivered usual care and received simple, patient-level PIP feedback. Primary outcomes were the proportion of patients with PIP and the mean number of potentially inappropriate prescriptions at 1-year follow-up. Intention-to-treat analysis using random effects regression was used.Results: All 21 GP practices and 186 (95 %) patients were followed up. We found that at 1-year follow-up, the significant reduction in the odds of PIP exposure achieved during the intervention was sustained after its discontinuation (adjusted OR 0.28, 95 % CI 0.11 to 0.76, P = 0.01). Intervention participants had significantly lower odds of having a potentially inappropriate proton pump inhibitor compared to controls (adjusted OR 0.40, 95 % CI 0.17 to 0.94, P = 0.04).Conclusion: The significant reduction in the odds of PIP achieved during the intervention was sustained after its discontinuation. These results indicate that improvements in prescribing quality can be maintained over time.Trial Registration: Current controlled trials ISRCTN41694007 . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. 'I don't think I'd be frightened if the statins went': a phenomenological qualitative study exploring medicines use in palliative care patients, carers and healthcare professionals.
- Author
-
Todd, Adam, Holmes, Holly, Pearson, Sallie, Hughes, Carmel, Andrew, Inga, Baker, Lisa, and Husband, Andy
- Subjects
ATTITUDE (Psychology) ,DRUGS ,DRUG prescribing ,INTERVIEWING ,PHENOMENOLOGY ,MEDICAL personnel ,PALLIATIVE treatment ,RESEARCH funding ,PHYSICIAN practice patterns ,QUALITATIVE research ,THEMATIC analysis ,PATIENTS' attitudes ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
Background: There is a growing body of evidence suggesting patients with life-limiting illness use medicines inappropriately and unnecessarily. In this context, the perspective of patients, their carers and the healthcare professionals responsible for prescribing and monitoring their medication is important for developing deprescribing strategies. The aim of this study was to explore the lived experience of patients, carers and healthcare professionals in the context of medication use in life-limiting illness. Methods: In-depth interviews, using a phenomenological approach: methods of transcendental phenomenology were used for the patient and carer interviews, while hermeneutic phenomenology was used for the healthcare professional interviews. Results: The study highlighted that medication formed a significant part of a patient's day-to-day routine; this was also apparent for their carers who took on an active role-as a gatekeeper of care-in managing medication. Patients described the experience of a point in which, in their disease journey, they placed less importance on taking certain medications; healthcare professionals also recognize this and refer it as a 'transition'. This point appeared to occur when the patient became accepting of their illness and associated life expectancy. There was also willingness by patients, carers and healthcare professionals to review and alter the medication used by patients in the context of life-limiting illness. Conclusions: There is a need to develop deprescribing strategies for patients with life-limiting illness. Such strategies should seek to establish patient expectations, consider the timing of the discussion about ceasing treatment and encourage the involvement of other stakeholders in the decision-making progress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Low-dose aspirin and survival from lung cancer: a population-based cohort study.
- Author
-
Mc Menamin, Úna C., Cardwell, Chris R., Hughes, Carmel M., and Murray, Liam M.
- Subjects
DRUG dosage ,LUNG cancer patients ,LUNG cancer treatment ,ASPIRIN ,CANCER invasiveness ,CANCER-related mortality ,COHORT analysis ,ANTINEOPLASTIC agents ,ENZYME inhibitors ,LONGITUDINAL method ,LUNG tumors ,CASE-control method - Abstract
Background: Preclinical evidence suggests that aspirin may inhibit lung cancer progression. In a large cohort of lung cancer patients, we investigated whether low-dose aspirin use was associated with a reduction in the risk of lung cancer-specific mortality.Methods: We identified lung cancer patients from English cancer registries diagnosed between 1998 to 2009 from the National Cancer Data Repository. Medication usage was obtained from linkages to the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink and lung cancer-specific deaths were identified from Office of National Statistics mortality data. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for the association between low-dose aspirin use (before and after diagnosis) and risk of lung cancer-specific mortality were calculated using Cox regression models.Results: A total of 14,735 lung cancer patients were identified during the study period. In analysis of 3,635 lung cancer patients, there was no suggestion of an association between low-dose aspirin use after diagnosis and cancer-specific mortality (adjusted HR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.09). Similarly, no association was evident for low-dose aspirin use before diagnosis and cancer-specific mortality (adjusted HR=1.00, 95% CI: 0.95, 1.05). Associations were comparable by duration of use and for all-cause mortality.Conclusion: Overall, we found little evidence of a protective association between low-dose aspirin use and cancer-specific mortality in a large population-based lung cancer cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Improving appropriate polypharmacy for older people in primary care: selecting components of an evidence-based intervention to target prescribing and dispensing.
- Author
-
Cadogan, Cathal A., Ryan, Cristín, Francis, Jill J., Gormley, Gerard J., Passmore, Peter, Kerse, Ngaire, and Hughes, Carmel M.
- Subjects
POLYPHARMACY ,PRIMARY care ,EVIDENCE-based medicine ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,PHARMACISTS ,ATTITUDE (Psychology) ,CLINICAL competence ,ECOLOGY ,HEALTH attitudes ,MEDICAL personnel ,GENERAL practitioners ,PRIMARY health care ,PSYCHOLOGY ,QUALITY assurance ,SELF-efficacy ,THEORY ,OCCUPATIONAL roles ,SOCIAL support ,SOCIAL context - Abstract
Background: The use of multiple medicines (polypharmacy) is increasingly common in older people. Ensuring that patients receive the most appropriate combinations of medications (appropriate polypharmacy) is a significant challenge. The quality of evidence to support the effectiveness of interventions to improve appropriate polypharmacy is low. Systematic identification of mediators of behaviour change, using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), provides a theoretically robust evidence base to inform intervention design. This study aimed to (1) identify key theoretical domains that were perceived to influence the prescribing and dispensing of appropriate polypharmacy to older patients by general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists, and (2) map domains to associated behaviour change techniques (BCTs) to include as components of an intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy in older people in primary care.Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with members of each healthcare professional (HCP) group using tailored topic guides based on TDF version 1 (12 domains). Questions covering each domain explored HCPs' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to ensuring the prescribing and dispensing of appropriate polypharmacy to older people. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis involved the framework method and content analysis. Key domains were identified and mapped to BCTs based on established methods and discussion within the research team.Results: Thirty HCPs were interviewed (15 GPs, 15 pharmacists). Eight key domains were identified, perceived to influence prescribing and dispensing of appropriate polypharmacy: 'Skills', 'Beliefs about capabilities', 'Beliefs about consequences', 'Environmental context and resources', 'Memory, attention and decision processes', 'Social/professional role and identity', 'Social influences' and 'Behavioural regulation'. Following mapping, four BCTs were selected for inclusion in an intervention for GPs or pharmacists: 'Action planning', 'Prompts/cues', 'Modelling or demonstrating of behaviour' and 'Salience of consequences'. An additional BCT ('Social support or encouragement') was selected for inclusion in a community pharmacy-based intervention in order to address barriers relating to interprofessional working that were encountered by pharmacists.Conclusions: Selected BCTs will be operationalised in a theory-based intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy for older people, to be delivered in GP practice and community pharmacy settings. Future research will involve development and feasibility testing of this intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Defining the content and delivery of an intervention to Change AdhereNce to treatment in BonchiEctasis (CAN-BE): a qualitative approach incorporating the Theoretical Domains Framework, behavioural change techniques and stakeholder expert panels.
- Author
-
McCullough, Amanda R., Ryan, Cristín, O'Neill, Brenda, Bradley, Judy M., Elborn, J. Stuart, and Hughes, Carmel M.
- Subjects
HEALTH care intervention (Social services) ,PATIENT compliance ,BRONCHIECTASIS ,HEALTH outcome assessment ,FOCUS groups ,MEDICAL personnel ,THERAPEUTICS - Abstract
Background: Low patient adherence to treatment is associated with poorer health outcomes in bronchiectasis. We sought to use the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) (a framework derived from 33 psychological theories) and behavioural change techniques (BCTs) to define the content of an intervention to change patients' adherence in bronchiectasis (Stage 1 and 2) and stakeholder expert panels to define its delivery (Stage 3). Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with patients with bronchiectasis about barriers and motivators to adherence to treatment and focus groups or interviews with bronchiectasis healthcare professionals (HCPs) about their ability to change patients' adherence to treatment. We coded these data to the 12 domain TDF to identify relevant domains for patients and HCPs (Stage 1). Three researchers independently mapped relevant domains for patients and HCPs to a list of 35 BCTs to identify two lists (patient and HCP) of potential BCTs for inclusion (Stage 2). We presented these lists to three expert panels (two with patients and one with HCPs/ academics from across the UK). We asked panels who the intervention should target, who should deliver it, at what intensity, in what format and setting, and using which outcome measures (Stage 3). Results: Eight TDF domains were perceived to influence patients' and HCPs' behaviours: Knowledge, Skills, Beliefs about capability, Beliefs about consequences, Motivation, Social influences, Behavioural regulation and Nature of behaviours (Stage 1). Twelve BCTs common to patients and HCPs were included in the intervention: Monitoring, Self-monitoring, Feedback, Action planning, Problem solving, Persuasive communication, Goal/target specified:behaviour/outcome, Information regarding behaviour/outcome, Role play, Social support and Cognitive restructuring (Stage 2). Participants thought that an individualised combination of these BCTs should be delivered to all patients, by a member of staff, over several one-to-one and/or group visits in secondary care. Efficacy should be measured using pulmonary exacerbations, hospital admissions and quality of life (Stage 3). Conclusions: Twelve BCTs form the intervention content. An individualised selection from these 12 BCTs will be delivered to all patients over several face-to-face visits in secondary care. Future research should focus on developing physical materials to aid delivery of the intervention prior to feasibility and pilot testing. If effective, this intervention may improve adherence and health outcomes for those with bronchiectasis in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. The development of the PROMPT (PRescribing Optimally in Middle-aged People’s Treatments) criteria.
- Author
-
Cooper, Janine A., Ryan, Cristín, Smith, Susan M., Wallace, Emma, Bennett, Kathleen, Cahir, Caitriona, Williams, David, Teeling, Mary, Fahey, Tom, and Hughes, Carmel M.
- Abstract
Background: Whilst multimorbidity is more prevalent with increasing age, approximately 30% of middle-aged adults (45–64 years) are also affected. Several prescribing criteria have been developed to optimise medication use in older people (≥65 years) with little focus on potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in middle-aged adults. We have developed a set of explicit prescribing criteria called PROMPT (PRescribing Optimally in Middle-aged People’s Treatments) which may be applied to prescribing datasets to determine the prevalence of PIP in this age-group. Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify published prescribing criteria for all age groups, with the Project Steering Group (convened for this study) adding further criteria for consideration, all of which were reviewed for relevance to middle-aged adults. These criteria underwent a two-round Delphi process, using an expert panel consisting of general practitioners, pharmacists and clinical pharmacologists from the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Using web-based questionnaires, 17 panellists were asked to indicate their level of agreement with each criterion via a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree) to assess the applicability to middle-aged adults in the absence of clinical information. Criteria were accepted/rejected/revised dependent on the panel’s level of agreement using the median response/interquartile range and additional comments. Results: Thirty-four criteria were rated in the first round of this exercise and consensus was achieved on 17 criteria which were accepted into the PROMPT criteria. Consensus was not reached on the remaining 17, and six criteria were removed following a review of the additional comments. The second round of this exercise focused on the remaining 11 criteria, some of which were revised following the first exercise. Five criteria were accepted from the second round, providing a final list of 22 criteria [gastro-intestinal system (n = 3), cardiovascular system (n = 4), respiratory system (n = 4), central nervous system (n = 6), infections (n = 1), endocrine system (n = 1), musculoskeletal system (n = 2), duplicates (n = 1)]. Conclusions: PROMPT is the first set of prescribing criteria developed for use in middle-aged adults. The utility of these criteria will be tested in future studies using prescribing datasets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Treatment adherence and health outcomes in patients with bronchiectasis.
- Author
-
McCullough, Amanda R., Tunney, Michael M., Quittner, Alexandra L., Elborn, J. Stuart, Bradley, Judy M., and Hughes, Carmel M.
- Subjects
BRONCHIECTASIS ,ANTIBIOTICS ,QUALITY of life ,PSEUDOMONAS aeruginosa infections ,PULMONARY function tests ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,THERAPEUTICS - Abstract
Background We aimed to determine adherence to inhaled antibiotics, other respiratory medicines and airway clearance and to determine the association between adherence to these treatments and health outcomes (pulmonary exacerbations, lung function and Quality of Life Questionnaire- Bronchiectasis [QOL-B]) in bronchiectasis after 12 months. Methods Patients with bronchiectasis prescribed inhaled antibiotics for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection were recruited into a one-year study. Participants were categorised as "adherent" to medication (medication possession ratio =80% using prescription data) or airway clearance (score =80% in the Modified Self-Reported Medication-Taking Scale). Pulmonary exacerbations were defined as treatment with a new course of oral or intravenous antibiotics over the one-year study. Spirometry and QOL-B were completed at baseline and 12 months. Associations between adherence to treatment and pulmonary exacerbations, lung function and QOL-B were determined by regression analyses. Results Seventy-five participants were recruited. Thirty-five (53%), 39 (53%) and 31 (41%) participants were adherent to inhaled antibiotics, other respiratory medicines, and airway clearance, respectively. Twelve (16%) participants were adherent to all treatments. Participants who were adherent to inhaled antibiotics had significantly fewer exacerbations compared to non-adherent participants (2.6 vs 4, p = 0.00) and adherence to inhaled antibiotics was independently associated with having fewer pulmonary exacerbations (regression co-efficient = -0.51, 95% CI [-0.81,-0.21], p < 0.001). Adherence to airway clearance was associated with lower QOL-B Treatment Burden (regression co-efficient = -15.46, 95% CI [-26.54, -4.37], p < 0.01) and Respiratory Symptoms domain scores (regression co-efficient = -10.77, 95% CI [-21.45; -0.09], p < 0.05). There were no associations between adherence to other respiratory medicines and any of the outcomes tested. Adherence to treatment was not associated with FEV1% predicted. Conclusions Treatment adherence is low in bronchiectasis and affects important health outcomes including pulmonary exacerbations. Adherence should be measured as part of bronchiectasis management and future research should evaluate bronchiectasis-specific adherence strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. Potentially inappropriate prescribing among older people in the United Kingdom.
- Author
-
Bradley, Marie C., Motterlini, Nicola, Padmanabhan, Shivani, Cahir, Caitriona, Williams, Tim, Fahey, Tom, and Hughes, Carmel M.
- Subjects
OLDER people ,INAPPROPRIATE prescribing (Medicine) ,MORTALITY ,HOSPITAL admission & discharge ,RETROSPECTIVE studies ,CROSS-sectional method - Abstract
Background Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in older people is associated with increases in morbidity, hospitalisation and mortality. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of and factors associated with PIP, among those aged ⩾70 years, in the United Kingdom, using a comprehensive set of prescribing indicators and comparing these to estimates obtained from a truncated set of the same indicators. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), in 2007. Participants included those aged ⩾ 70 years, in CPRD. Fifty-two PIP indicators from the Screening Tool of Older Persons Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria were applied to data on prescribed drugs and clinical diagnoses. Overall prevalence of PIP and prevalence according to individual STOPP criteria were estimated. The relationship between PIP and polypharmacy (⩾4 medications), comorbidity, age, and gender was examined. A truncated, subset of 28 STOPP criteria that were used in two previous studies, were further applied to the data to facilitate comparison. Results Using 52 indicators, the overall prevalence of PIP in the study population (n = 1,019,491) was 29%. The most common examples of PIP were therapeutic duplication (11.9%), followed by use of aspirin with no indication (11.3%) and inappropriate use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (3.7%). PIP was strongly associated with polypharmacy (Odds Ratio 18.2, 95% Confidence Intervals, 18.0-18.4, P < 0.05). PIP was more common in those aged 70-74 years vs. 85 years or more and in males. Application of the smaller subset of the STOPP criteria resulted in a lower PIP prevalence at 14.9% (95% CIs 14.8-14.9%) (n = 151,598). The most common PIP issues identified with this subset were use of PPIs at maximum dose for > 8 weeks, NSAIDs for > 3 months (3.2% 32,373 patients), and use of long-term neuroleptics. Conclusions PIP was prevalent in the UK and increased with polypharmacy. Application of the comprehensive set of STOPP criteria allowed more accurate estimation of PIP compared to the subset of criteria used in previous studies. These findings may provide a focus for targeted interventions to reduce PIP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Post-diagnostic prescriptions for low-dose aspirin and breast cancer-specific survival: a nested case-control study in a breast cancer cohort from the UK Clinical Practice.
- Author
-
Murray, Liam J., Cooper, Janine A., Hughes, Carmel M., Powe, Des G., and Cardwell, Chris R.
- Subjects
BREAST cancer patients ,ASPIRIN ,CANCER-related mortality ,BREAST cancer diagnosis ,HORMONE therapy - Abstract
Introduction Recent observational studies indicate that post-diagnostic use of aspirin in breast cancer patients may protect against cancer progression perhaps by inhibiting cyclooxygenase-2 dependent mechanisms. Evidence also supports a crucial role for interactions between tumour cells and circulating platelets in cancer growth and dissemination, therefore, use of low-dose aspirin may reduce the risk of death from cancer in breast cancer patients. Methods A cohort of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients (1998–2006) were identified in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (and confirmed by cancer registry linkage). Cancerspecific deaths were identified up to 2011 from Office for National Statistics mortality data. A nested case–control analysis was conducted using conditional logistic regression to compare post-diagnostic aspirin exposure using General Practice prescription data in 1,435 cases (breast cancer deaths) with 5,697 controls (matched by age and year of diagnosis). Results After breast cancer diagnosis, 18.3% of cancer-specific deaths and 18.5% of matched controls received at least one prescription for low-dose aspirin, corresponding to an odds ratio (OR) of 0.98 (95% CI 0.83, 1.15). Adjustment for potential confounders (including stage and grade) had little impact on this estimate. No dose response relationship was observed when the number of tablets was investigated and no associations were seen when analyses were stratified by receipt of prescriptions for aspirin in the pre-diagnostic period, by stage at diagnosis or by receipt of prescriptions for hormone therapy. Conclusions Overall, in this large population-based cohort of breast cancer patients, there was little evidence of an association between receipt of post-diagnostic prescriptions for low-dose aspirin and breast cancer-specific death. However, information was not available on medication compliance or over-the-counter use of aspirin, which may have contributed to the null findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. The relationship between BMI and the prescription of anti-obesity medication according to social factors: a population cross sectional study.
- Author
-
Patterson, Lynsey, Kee, Frank, Hughes, Carmel, and O'Reilly, Dermot
- Subjects
ANTIOBESITY agents ,BODY mass index ,PUBLIC health ,PRIMARY care ,CROSS-sectional method - Abstract
Background Obesity is a global public health problem. There are a range of treatments available with varying short and long term success rates. One option is the use of anti-obesity medication the prescription of which has increased dramatically in recent years. Despite this, little is known about the individual and GP practice factors that influence the prescription of antiobesity medication. Methods Multi-level logistic regression analysis was used to investigate factors associated with the prescription of anti-obesity medication in Northern Ireland using a population primary care prescribing database (~1.5 million people aged 16+ years) during 2009/10. Results While 25.0% of people are obese, only 1.3% (2.1% of females, 0.6% of males) received antiobesity medication. The relationship between medication rates and age differed by gender (P < 0.001) with prescriptions higher in younger females and older males. Prescribing of anti-obesity medication reflected obesity prevalence across urban/rural areas and deprivation. There was an unexplained two-fold difference, between the 25
th and 75th percentile, in the GP practice prescription of anti-obesity medication. Conclusions There is evidence of relative under-prescribing in males compared to females despite a similar prevalence of obesity. While the prevalence (and presumably the health consequences) of obesity worsens with age, younger females are more likely to be prescribed anti-obesity medication. This suggests an element of patient demand. Educational material to improve the understanding of the role of anti-obesity medication, for patients and practitioners, is recommended. But further study is needed to understand the factors responsible for the variation in prescribing between GP practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Drugs affecting the renin-angiotensin system and survival from cancer: a population based study of breast, colorectal and prostate cancer patient cohorts.
- Author
-
Cardwell, Chris R., Menamin, Úna C., Hicks, Blánaid M., Hughes, Carmel, Cantwell, Marie M., and Murray, Liam J.
- Subjects
RENIN-angiotensin system ,ACE inhibitors ,ANGIOTENSIN-receptor blockers ,BREAST cancer treatment ,COLON cancer ,PROSTATE cancer - Abstract
Background Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are commonly prescribed to the growing number of cancer patients (more than two million in the UK alone) often to treat hypertension. However, increased fatal cancer in ARB users in a randomized trial and increased breast cancer recurrence rates in ACEI users in a recent observational study have raised concerns about their safety in cancer patients. We investigated whether ACEI or ARB use after breast, colorectal or prostate cancer diagnosis was associated with increased risk of cancer-specific mortality. Methods Population-based cohorts of 9,814 breast, 4,762 colorectal and 6,339 prostate cancer patients newly diagnosed from 1998 to 2006 were identified in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink and confirmed by cancer registry linkage. Cancer-specific and all-cause mortality were identified from Office of National Statistics mortality data in 2011 (allowing up to 13 years of follow-up). A nested case--control analysis was conducted to compare ACEI/ARB use (from general practitioner prescription records) in cancer patients dying from cancer with up to five controls (not dying from cancer). Conditional logistic regression estimated the risk of cancer-specific, and all-cause, death in ACEI/ARB users compared with non-users. Results The main analysis included 1,435 breast, 1,511 colorectal and 1,184 prostate cancer-specific deaths (and 7,106 breast, 7,291 colorectal and 5,849 prostate cancer controls). There was no increase in cancer-specific mortality in patients using ARBs after diagnosis of breast (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.06 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84, 1.35), colorectal (adjusted OR = 0.82 95% CI 0.64, 1.07) or prostate cancer (adjusted OR = 0.79 95% CI 0.61, 1.03). There was also no evidence of increases in cancer-specific mortality with ACEI use for breast (adjusted OR = 1.06 95% CI 0.89, 1.27), colorectal (adjusted OR = 0.78 95% CI 0.66, 0.92) or prostate cancer (adjusted OR = 0.78 95% CI 0.66, 0.92). Conclusions Overall, we found no evidence of increased risks of cancer-specific mortality in breast, colorectal or prostate cancer patients who used ACEI or ARBs after diagnosis. These results provide some reassurance that these medications are safe in patients diagnosed with these cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Addressing potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients: development and pilot study of an intervention in primary care (the OPTI-SCRIPT study).
- Author
-
Clyne, Barbara, Bradley, Marie C., Hughes, Carmel M., Clear, Daniel, McDonnell, Ronan, Williams, David, Fahey, Tom, and Smith, Susan M.
- Subjects
DRUG prescribing ,PRIMARY care ,HOSPITAL care ,MORTALITY ,GENERAL practitioners - Abstract
Background: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in older people is common in primary care and can result in increased morbidity, adverse drug events, hospitalizations and mortality. The prevalence of PIP in Ireland is estimated at 36% with an associated expenditure of over €45 million in 2007. The aim of this paper is to describe the application of the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework to the development of an intervention to decrease PIP in Irish primary care. Methods: The MRC framework for the design and evaluation of complex interventions guided the development of the study intervention. In the development stage, literature was reviewed and combined with information obtained from experts in the field using a consensus based methodology and patient cases to define the main components of the intervention. In the pilot stage, five GPs tested the proposed intervention. Qualitative interviews were conducted with the GPs to inform the development and implementation of the intervention for the main randomised controlled trial. Results: The literature review identified PIP criteria for inclusion in the study and two initial intervention components - academic detailing and medicines review supported by therapeutic treatment algorithms. Through patient case studies and a focus group with a group of 8 GPs, these components were refined and a third component of the intervention identified - patient information leaflets. The intervention was tested in a pilot study. In total, eight medicine reviews were conducted across five GP practices. These reviews addressed ten instances of PIP, nine of which were addressed in the form of either a dose reduction or a discontinuation of a targeted medication. Qualitative interviews highlighted that GPs were receptive to the intervention but patient preference and time needed both to prepare for and conduct the medicines review, emerged as potential barriers. Findings from the pilot study allowed further refinement to produce the finalised intervention of academic detailing with a pharmacist, medicines review with web-based therapeutic treatment algorithms and tailored patient information leaflets. Conclusions: The MRC framework was used in the development of the OPTI-SCRIPT intervention to decrease the level of PIP in primary care in Ireland. Its application ensured that the intervention was developed using the best available evidence, was acceptable to GPs and feasible to deliver in the clinical setting. The effectiveness of this intervention is currently being tested in a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. Trial registration: Current controlled trials ISRCTN41694007 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Effectiveness of medicines review with web-based pharmaceutical treatment algorithms in reducing potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people in primary care: a cluster randomized trial (OPTI-SCRIPT study protocol).
- Author
-
Clyne, Barbara, Bradley, Marie C., Smith, Susan M., Hughes, Carmel M., Motterlini, Nicola, Clear, Daniel, McDonnell, Ronan, Williams, David, and Fahey, Tom
- Subjects
PRIMARY care ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,MEDICAL care for older people ,HOSPITAL care ,ALGORITHMS - Abstract
Background: Potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people is common in primary care and can result in increased morbidity, adverse drug events, hospitalizations and mortality. In Ireland, 36% of those aged 70 years or over received at least one potentially inappropriate medication, with an associated expenditure of over €45 million. The main objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness and acceptability of a complex, multifaceted intervention in reducing the level of potentially inappropriate prescribing in primary care. Methods/design: This study is a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial, conducted in primary care (OPTISCRIPT trial), involving 22 practices (clusters) and 220 patients. Practices will be allocated to intervention or control arms using minimization, with intervention participants receiving a complex multifaceted intervention incorporating academic detailing, medicines review with web-based pharmaceutical treatment algorithms that provide recommended alternative treatment options, and tailored patient information leaflets. Control practices will deliver usual care and receive simple patient-level feedback on potentially inappropriate prescribing. Routinely collected national prescribing data will also be analyzed for nonparticipating practices, acting as a contemporary national control. The primary outcomes are the proportion of participant patients with potentially inappropriate prescribing and the mean number of potentially inappropriate prescriptions per patient. In addition, economic and qualitative evaluations will be conducted. Discussion: This study will establish the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention in reducing potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people in Irish primary care that is generalizable to countries with similar prescribing challenges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. A feasibility study of a theory-based intervention to improve appropriate polypharmacy for older people in primary care.
- Author
-
Cadogan CA, Ryan C, Gormley GJ, Francis JJ, Passmore P, Kerse N, and Hughes CM
- Abstract
Background: A general practitioner (GP)-targeted intervention aimed at improving the prescribing of appropriate polypharmacy for older people was previously developed using a systematic, theory-based approach based on the UK Medical Research Council's complex intervention framework. The primary intervention component comprised a video demonstration of a GP prescribing appropriate polypharmacy during a consultation with an older patient. The video was delivered to GPs online and included feedback emphasising the positive outcomes of performing the behaviour. As a complementary intervention component, patients were invited to scheduled medication review consultations with GPs. This study aimed to test the feasibility of the intervention and study procedures (recruitment, data collection)., Methods: GPs from two general practices were given access to the video, and reception staff scheduled consultations with older patients receiving polypharmacy (≥4 medicines). Primary feasibility study outcomes were the usability and acceptability of the intervention to GPs. Feedback was collected from GP and patient participants using structured questionnaires. Clinical data were also extracted from recruited patients' medical records (baseline and 1 month post-consultation). The feasibility of applying validated assessment of prescribing appropriateness (STOPP/START criteria, Medication Appropriateness Index) and medication regimen complexity (Medication Regimen Complexity Index) to these data was investigated. Data analysis was descriptive, providing an overview of participants' feedback and clinical assessment findings., Results: Four GPs and ten patients were recruited across two practices. The intervention was considered usable and acceptable by GPs. Some reservations were expressed by GPs as to whether the video truly reflected resource and time pressures encountered in the general practice working environment. Patient feedback on the scheduled consultations was positive. Patients welcomed the opportunity to have their medications reviewed. Due to the short time to follow-up and a lack of detailed clinical information in patient records, it was not feasible to detect any prescribing changes or to apply the assessment tools to patients' clinical data., Conclusion: The findings will help to further refine the intervention and study procedures (including time to follow-up) which will be tested in a randomised pilot study that will inform the design of a definitive trial to evaluate the intervention's effectiveness., Trial Registration: ISRCTN18176245.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Factors affecting collaboration between general practitioners and community pharmacists: a qualitative study.
- Author
-
Rubio-Valera M, Jové AM, Hughes CM, Guillen-Solà M, Rovira M, and Fernández A
- Subjects
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Qualitative Research, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Spain, Community Pharmacy Services, General Practitioners, Interprofessional Relations, Pharmacists
- Abstract
Background: Although general practitioners (GPs) and community pharmacists (CPs) are encouraged to collaborate, a true collaborative relationship does not exist between them. Our objective was to identify and analyze factors affecting GP-CP collaboration., Methods: This was a descriptive-exploratory qualitative study carried out in two Spanish regions: Catalonia (Barcelona) and Balearic Islands (Mallorca). Face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs and CPs from Barcelona and Mallorca (January 2010-February 2011). Analysis was conducted using Colaizzi's method., Results: Thirty-seven interviews were conducted. The factors affecting the relationship were different depending on timing: 1) Before collaboration had started (prior to collaboration) and 2) Once the collaboration had been initiated (during collaboration). Prior to collaboration, four key factors were found to affect it: the perception of usefulness; the Primary Care Health Center (PCHC) manager's interest; the professionals' attitude; and geography and legislation. These factors were affected by economic and organizational aspects (i.e. resources or PCHC management styles) and by professionals' opinions and beliefs (i.e. perception of the existence of a public-private conflict). During collaboration, the achievement of objectives and the changes in the PCHC management were the key factors influencing continued collaboration. The most relevant differences between regions were due to the existence of privately-managed PCHCs in Barcelona that facilitated the implementation of collaboration. In comparison with the group with experience in collaboration, some professionals without experience reported a skeptical attitude towards it, reporting that it might not be necessary., Conclusions: Factors related to economic issues, management and practitioners' attitudes and perceptions might be crucial for triggering collaboration. Interventions and strategies derived from these identified factors could be applied to achieve multidisciplinary collaboration.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.