13 results on '"McKevitt, Christopher"'
Search Results
2. An individually randomised controlled multi-centre pragmatic trial with embedded economic and process evaluations of early vocational rehabilitation compared with usual care for stroke survivors: study protocol for the RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) trial
- Author
-
Radford, Kathryn A., Craven, Kristelle, McLellan, Vicki, Sach, Tracey H., Brindle, Richard, Holloway, Ivana, Hartley, Suzanne, Bowen, Audrey, O’Connor, Rory, Stevens, Judith, Philips, Julie, Walker, Marion, Holmes, Jain, McKevitt, Christopher, Murray, John, Watkins, Caroline, Powers, Katie, Shone, Angela, and Farrin, Amanda
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. “Like a nurse but not a nurse”: Clinical Research Practitioners and the evolution of the clinical research delivery workforce in the NHS
- Author
-
Faulkner-Gurstein, Rachel, Jones, Helen C., and McKevitt, Christopher
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. The effect of rehabilitation interventions on physical function and immobility-related complications in severe stroke—protocol for a systematic review
- Author
-
McGlinchey, Mark P., James, Jimmy, McKevitt, Christopher, Douiri, Abdel, McLachlan, Sarah, and Sackley, Catherine M.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. An intervention to support stroke survivors and their carers in the longer term (LoTS2Care): study protocol for the process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial
- Author
-
Hardicre, Natasha K., Crocker, Thomas F, Wright, Alan, Burton, Louisa-Jane, Ozer, Seline, Atkinson, Ross, House, Allan, Hewison, Jenny, McKevitt, Christopher, Forster, Anne, Farrin, Amanda J., and on behalf of the LoTS2Care Programme Management Group
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. The potential role of cost-utility analysis in the decision to implement major system change in acute stroke services in metropolitan areas in England
- Author
-
Hunter, Rachael M., Fulop, Naomi J., Boaden, Ruth J., McKevitt, Christopher, Perry, Catherine, Ramsay, Angus I. G., Rudd, Anthony G., Turner, Simon J., Tyrrell, Pippa J., Wolfe, Charles D. A., and Morris, Stephen
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Embedding research in health systems: lessons from complexity theory.
- Author
-
Caffrey, Louise, Wolfe, Charles, and McKevitt, Christopher
- Subjects
PUBLIC health research ,COMPLEXITY (Philosophy) ,HEALTH systems agencies ,ORGANIZATIONAL change ,STRATEGIC planning ,COMMUNICATION ,HOSPITALS ,HOSPITAL admission & discharge ,LEADERSHIP ,MEDICAL care ,MEDICAL personnel ,MEDICAL research ,NATIONAL health services ,PATIENTS ,RESEARCH funding ,PATIENT selection - Abstract
Background: Internationally, there has been increasing focus on creating health research systems. This article aims to investigate the challenges of implementing apparently simple strategies to support the development of a health research system. We focus on a case study of an English National Health Service Hospital Trust that sought to implement the national recommendation that health organisations should introduce a statement about research on all patient admission letters.Methods: We apply core concepts from complexity theory to the case study and undertake a documentary analysis of the email dialogue between staff involved in implementing this initiative.Results: The process of implementing a research statement in patient admission letters in one clinical service took 1 year and 21 days. The length of time needed was influenced firstly by adaptive self-organisation, underpinned by competing interests. Secondly, it was influenced by the relationship between systems, rather than simply being a product of issues within those systems. The relationship between the health system and the research system was weaker than might have been expected. Responsibilities were unclear, leading to confusion and delayed action.Conclusions: Conventional ways of thinking about organisations suggest that change happens when leaders and managers change the strategic vision, structure or procedures in an organisation and then persuade others to rationally implement the strategy. However, health research systems are complex adaptive systems characterised by high levels of unpredictability due to self-organisation and systemic interactions, which give rise to 'emergent' properties. We argue for the need to study how micro-processes of organisational dynamics may give rise to macro patterns of behaviour and strategic organisational direction and for the use of systems approaches to investigate the emergent properties of health research systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Explaining outcomes in major system change: a qualitative study of implementing centralised acute stroke services in two large metropolitan regions in England.
- Author
-
Fulop, Naomi J., Ramsay, Angus I. G., Perry, Catherine, Boaden, Ruth J., McKevitt, Christopher, Rudd, Anthony G., Turner, Simon J., Tyrrell, Pippa J., Wolfe, Charles D. A., Morris1, Stephen, and Morris, Stephen
- Subjects
HEALTH care reform ,STROKE patients ,MEDICAL care ,EVIDENCE-based medicine ,METROPOLITAN areas ,HUMAN services ,STROKE treatment ,COMMUNITY health services ,COMPARATIVE studies ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH funding ,URBAN health ,QUALITATIVE research ,EVALUATION research ,EVALUATION of human services programs - Abstract
Background: Implementing major system change in healthcare is not well understood. This gap may be addressed by analysing change in terms of interrelated components identified in the implementation literature, including decision to change, intervention selection, implementation approaches, implementation outcomes, and intervention outcomes.Methods: We conducted a qualitative study of two cases of major system change: the centralisation of acute stroke services in Manchester and London, which were associated with significantly different implementation outcomes (fidelity to referral pathway) and intervention outcomes (provision of evidence-based care, patient mortality). We interviewed stakeholders at national, pan-regional, and service-levels (n = 125) and analysed 653 documents. Using a framework developed for this study from the implementation science literature, we examined factors influencing implementation approaches; how these approaches interacted with the models selected to influence implementation outcomes; and their relationship to intervention outcomes.Results: London and Manchester's differing implementation outcomes were influenced by the different service models selected and implementation approaches used. Fidelity to the referral pathway was higher in London, where a 'simpler', more inclusive model was used, implemented with a 'big bang' launch and 'hands-on' facilitation by stroke clinical networks. In contrast, a phased approach of a more complex pathway was used in Manchester, and the network acted more as a platform to share learning. Service development occurred more uniformly in London, where service specifications were linked to financial incentives, and achieving standards was a condition of service launch, in contrast to Manchester. 'Hands-on' network facilitation, in the form of dedicated project management support, contributed to achievement of these standards in London; such facilitation processes were less evident in Manchester.Conclusions: Using acute stroke service centralisation in London and Manchester as an example, interaction between model selected and implementation approaches significantly influenced fidelity to the model. The contrasting implementation outcomes may have affected differences in provision of evidence-based care and patient mortality. The framework used in this analysis may support planning and evaluating major system changes, but would benefit from application in different healthcare contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Evaluating an extended rehabilitation service for stroke patients (EXTRAS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Rodgers, Helen, Shaw, Lisa, Cant, Robin, Drummond, Avril, Ford, Gary A., Forster, Anne, Hills, Katie, Howel, Denise, Laverty, Anne-Marie, McKevitt, Christopher, McMeekin, Peter, and Price, Christopher
- Subjects
MEDICAL rehabilitation ,STROKE ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,COMMUNITY services ,MEDICAL economics - Abstract
Background: Development of longer term stroke rehabilitation services is limited by lack of evidence of effectiveness for specific interventions and service models. We describe the protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial which is evaluating an extended stroke rehabilitation service. The extended service commences when routine 'organised stroke care' (stroke unit and early supported discharge (ESD)) ends. Methods/design: This study is a multicentre randomised controlled trial with health economic and process evaluations. It is set within NHS stroke services which provide ESD. Participants are adults who have experienced a new stroke (and carer if appropriate), discharged from hospital under the care of an ESD team. The intervention group receives an extended stroke rehabilitation service provided for 18 months following completion of ESD. The extended rehabilitation service involves regular contact with a senior ESD team member who leads and coordinates further rehabilitation. Contact is usually by telephone. The control group receives usual stroke care post-ESD. Usual care may involve referral of patients to a range of rehabilitation services upon completion of ESD in accordance with local clinical practice. Randomisation is via a central independent web-based service. The primary outcome is extended activities of daily living (Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale) at 24 months post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes (at 12 and 24 months post-randomisation) are health status, quality of life, mood and experience of services for patients, and quality of life, experience of services and carer stress for carers. Resource use and adverse events are also collected. Outcomes are undertaken by a blinded assessor. Implementation and delivery of the extended stroke rehabilitation service will also be described. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with a subsample of participants and staff to gain insight into perceptions and experiences of rehabilitation services delivered or received. Allowing for 25% attrition, 510 participants are needed to provide 90% power to detect a difference in mean Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale score of 6 with a 5% significance level. Discussion: The provision of longer term support for stroke survivors is currently limited. The results from this trial will inform future stroke service planning and configuration. Trial registration: This trial was registered with ISRCTN (identifier: ISRCTN45203373) on 9 August 2012. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Barriers and opportunities for enhancing patient recruitment and retention in clinical research: findings from an interview study in an NHS academic health science centre.
- Author
-
Adams, Mary, Caffrey, Louise, and McKevitt, Christopher
- Subjects
PATIENT selection ,MEDICAL research ,NATIONAL health services ,ACADEMIC medical centers ,MEDICAL ethics - Abstract
Background: In the UK, the recruitment of patients into clinical research is a national health research and development policy priority. There has been limited investigation of how national level factors operate as barriers or facilitators to recruitment work, particularly from the perspective of staff undertaking patient recruitment work. The aim of this study is to identify and examine staff views of the key organisational barriers and facilitators to patient recruitment work in one clinical research group located in an NHS Academic Health Science Centre. Methods: A qualitative study utilizing in-depth, one-to-one semi-structured interviews with 11 purposively selected staff with particular responsibilities to recruit and retain patients as clinical research subjects. Thematic analysis classified interview data by recurring themes, concepts, and emergent categories for the purposes of establishing explanatory accounts. Results: The findings highlight four key factors that staff perceived to be most significant for the successful recruitment and retention of patients in research and identify how staff located these factors within patients, studies, the research centre, the trust, and beyond the trust. Firstly, competition for research participants at an organisational and national level was perceived to undermine recruitment success. Secondly, the tension between clinical and clinical research workloads was seen to interrupt patient recruitment into studies, despite national funding arrangements to manage excess treatment costs. Thirdly, staff perceived an imbalance between personal patient burden and benefit. Ethical committee regulation, designed to protect patients, was perceived by some staff to detract from clarification and systematisation of incentivisation strategies. Finally, the structure and relationships within clinical research teams, in particular the low tacit status of recruitment skills, was seen as influential. Conclusions: The results of this case-study, conducted in an exemplary NHS academic research centre, highlight current systematic challenges to patient recruitment and retention in clinical studies more generally as seen from the perspective of staff at the 'sharp end' of recruiting. Staff experience is that, beyond individual clinical research design and protocol factors, wider organisational and extra-organisational norms, structures, and processes operate as significant facilitators or hindrances in the recruitment of patients as research subjects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Implementing a training intervention to support caregivers after stroke: a process evaluation examining the initiation and embedding of programme change.
- Author
-
Clarke, David James, Godfrey, Mary, Hawkins, Rebecca, Sadler, Euan, Harding, Geoffrey, Forster, Anne, McKevitt, Christopher, Dickerson, Josie, and Farrin, Amanda
- Subjects
CAREGIVER education ,STROKE treatment ,MEDICAL care research ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials - Abstract
Background: Medical Research Council (MRC) guidance identifies implementation as a key element of the development and evaluation process for complex healthcare interventions. Implementation is itself a complex process involving the mobilization of human, material, and organizational resources to change practice within settings that have pre-existing structures, historical patterns of relationships, and routinized ways of working. Process evaluations enable researchers and clinicians to understand how implementation proceeds and what factors impact on intended program change. A qualitative process evaluation of the pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial; Training Caregivers after Stroke was conducted to examine how professionals were engaged in the work of delivering training; how they reached and involved caregivers for whom the intervention was most appropriate; how did those on whom training was targeted experience and respond to it. Normalization Process Theory, which focuses attention on implementing and embedding program change, was used as a sensitizing framework to examine selected findings. Results: Contextual factors including organizational history and team relationships, external policy, and service development initiatives, impinged on implementation of the caregiver training program in unintended ways that could not have been predicted through focus on mechanisms of individual and collective action at unit level. Factors that facilitated or impeded the effectiveness of the cascade training model used, whether and how stroke unit teams made sense of and engaged individually and collectively with a complex caregiver training intervention, and what impact these factors had on embedding the intervention in routine stroke unit practice were identified. Conclusions: Where implementation of complex interventions depends on multiple providers, time needs to be invested in reaching agreement on who will take responsibility for delivery of specific components and in determining how implementation and its effectiveness will be monitored. This goes beyond concern with intervention fidelity; explicit consideration also needs to be given to the implementation process in terms of how program change can be effected at organizational, practice, and service delivery levels. Normalization Process Theory's constructs help identify vulnerable features of implementation processes in respect of the work involved in embedding complex interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Innovations in major system reconfiguration in England: a study of the effectiveness, acceptability and processes of implementation of two models of stroke care.
- Author
-
Fulop, Naomi, Boaden, Ruth, Hunter, Rachael, McKevitt, Christopher, Morris, Steve, Pursani, Nanik, Ramsay, Angus I. G., Rudd, Anthony G., Tyrrell, Pippa J., and Wolfe, Charles D. A.
- Subjects
STROKE ,MEDICAL care ,PUBLIC health - Abstract
Background: Significant changes in provision of clinical care within the English National Health Service (NHS) have been discussed in recent years, with proposals to concentrate specialist services in fewer centres. Stroke is a major public health issue, accounting for over 10% of deaths in England and Wales, and much disability among survivors. Variations have been highlighted in stroke care, with many patients not receiving evidence-based care. To address these concerns, stroke services in London and Greater Manchester were reorganised, although different models were implemented. This study will analyse processes involved in making significant changes to stroke care services over a short time period, and the factors influencing these processes. We will examine whether the changes have delivered improvements in quality of care and patient outcomes; and, in light of this, whether the significant extra financial investment represented good value for money. Methods/design: This study brings together quantitative data on 'what works and at what cost?' with qualitative data on 'understanding implementation and sustainability' to understand major system change in two large conurbations in England. Data on processes of care and their outcomes (e.g. morbidity, mortality, and cost) will be analysed to evidence services' performance before and after reconfiguration. The evaluation draws on theories related to the dissemination and sustainability of innovations and the 'social matrix' underlying processes of innovation. We will conduct a series of case studies based on stakeholder interviews and documentary analysis. These will identify drivers for change, how the reconfigurations were governed, developed, and implemented, and how they influenced service quality. Discussion: The research faces challenges due to: the different timings of the reconfigurations; the retrospective nature of the evaluation; and the current organisational turbulence in the English NHS. However, these issues reflect the realities of major systems change and its evaluation. The methods applied in the study have been selected to account for and learn from these complexities, and will provide useful lessons for future reconfigurations, both in stroke care and other specialties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. An intervention to support stroke survivors and their carers in the longer term (LoTS2Care): study protocol for the process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial.
- Author
-
on behalf of the LoTS2Care Programme Management Group, Hardicre, Natasha K., Crocker, Thomas F, Wright, Alan, Burton, Louisa-Jane, Ozer, Seline, Atkinson, Ross, Forster, Anne, House, Allan, Hewison, Jenny, McKevitt, Christopher, Farrin, Amanda J., and LoTS2Care Programme Management Group
- Subjects
HEALTH care intervention (Social services) ,STROKE patients ,HEALTH outcome assessment ,QUALITY of life ,CAREGIVER education ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials - Abstract
Background: Whilst pathways relating to the early stages of stroke care have become well established, strategies for longer-term care are less developed and longer-term outcomes remain poor for many stroke survivors. New Start, a complex intervention that includes needs identification, exploration of social networks and components of problem-solving and self-management, was designed to improve stroke survivors' quality of life by addressing unmet needs and increasing participation. It is delivered approximately 6 months post-stroke by trained staff (facilitators). We are currently undertaking a cluster randomised feasibility trial of the New Start intervention with an embedded process evaluation, which is an important component of the design and testing of complex interventions as it provides an understanding of how interventions are delivered and function in different settings.Methods/design: This mixed methods process evaluation will explore the degree to which New Start is implemented as intended, the impact of context on intervention delivery and the acceptability of the intervention for stroke survivors, their families and practitioners. It will include non-participant observation of facilitator training and intervention delivery. Interviews with stroke survivors, facilitators and other relevant staff (including administrators and managerial staff) will be undertaken. Qualitative data from interview transcripts, facilitator reflections and observational field notes will be analysed thematically alongside numerical data documenting intervention delivery collected as part of the trial.Discussion: This process evaluation will identify factors that aid and impede implementation of the New Start intervention and improve understanding of this novel approach to longer-term stroke care.Trial Registration: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN38920246 . Registered on 22 June 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.