20 results on '"Moullin, Joanna C."'
Search Results
2. Retrospective analysis of patterns of opioid overdose and interventions delivered at a tertiary hospital emergency department: impact of COVID-19
- Author
-
Potaka, Katherine L., Freeman, Rebecca, Soo, Danny, Nguyen, Nam-Anh, Sim, Tin Fei, and Moullin, Joanna C.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Where is “policy” in dissemination and implementation science? Recommendations to advance theories, models, and frameworks: EPIS as a case example
- Author
-
Crable, Erika L., Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca, Stadnick, Nicole A., Moullin, Joanna C., and Aarons, Gregory A.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Does Case Management Provide Support for Staff Facing Frequent Users of Emergency Departments? A Comparative Mixed-Method Evaluation of ED Staff Perception
- Author
-
von Allmen, Michael, Grazioli, Véronique S., Kasztura, Miriam, Chastonay, Oriane, Moullin, Joanna C., Hugli, Olivier, Daeppen, Jean-Bernard, and Bodenmann, Patrick
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Forms and functions of bridging factors: specifying the dynamic links between outer and inner contexts during implementation and sustainment
- Author
-
Lengnick-Hall, Rebecca, Stadnick, Nicole A., Dickson, Kelsey S., Moullin, Joanna C., and Aarons, Gregory A.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Health care providers’ perception of the frequent emergency department user issue and of targeted case management interventions: a cross-sectional national survey in Switzerland
- Author
-
Chastonay, Oriane J., Lemoine, Melissa, Grazioli, Véronique S., Canepa Allen, Marina, Kasztura, Miriam, Moullin, Joanna C., Daeppen, Jean-Bernard, Hugli, Olivier, and Bodenmann, Patrick
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Provider REport of Sustainment Scale (PRESS): development and validation of a brief measure of inner context sustainment
- Author
-
Moullin, Joanna C., Sklar, Marisa, Ehrhart, Mark G., Green, Amy, and Aarons, Gregory A.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) 2019: where the rubber meets the road: the intersection of research, policy, and practice - part 1
- Author
-
Landes, Sara J., Kerns, Suzanne E. U., Pilar, Meagan R., Walsh-Bailey, Callie, Yu, Stephanie H., Byeon, Y. Vivian, Crane, Margaret E., Larson, Madeline, Bullock, Heather L., Baumann, Ana A., Comtois, Katherine Anne, Darnell, Doyanne, Dorsey, Shannon, Fizur, Phil, Lewis, Cara C., Moullin, Joanna C., Pierson, Andria, Powell, Byron J., Stanick, Cameo F., Wiltsey Stirman, Shannon, and Franks, Robert P.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Ten recommendations for using implementation frameworks in research and practice
- Author
-
Moullin, Joanna C., Dickson, Kelsey S., Stadnick, Nicole A., Albers, Bianca, Nilsen, Per, Broder-Fingert, Sarabeth, Mukasa, Barbara, and Aarons, Gregory A.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Fostering international collaboration in implementation science and research: a concept mapping exploratory study
- Author
-
Aarons, Gregory A., Seijo, Chariz, Green, Amy E., Moullin, Joanna C., Hasson, Henna, von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica, James, Sigrid, Ehrhart, Mark G., Ducarroz, Simon, Sevdalis, Nick, and Willging, Cathleen
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Development and testing of the Measure of Innovation-Specific Implementation Intentions (MISII) using Rasch measurement theory
- Author
-
Moullin, Joanna C., Ehrhart, Mark G., and Aarons, Gregory A.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Proceedings of the Virtual 3rd UK Implementation Science Research Conference : Virtual conference. 16 and 17 July 2020.
- Author
-
Bawab, Noura, Moullin, Joanna C., Bugnon, Olivier, Perraudin, Clémence, Morrow, April, Chan, Priscilla, Hogden, Emily, Taylor, Natalie, Pearson, Mark, Carrieri, Daniele, Mattick, Karen, Papoutsi, Chrysanthi, Briscoe, Simon, Wong, Geoff, Jackson, Mark, Rushton, Alita, Elmas, Kai, Bell, Jack, Binagwaho, Agnes, and Frisch, Miriam F.
- Subjects
- *
SCIENCE conferences , *MENTAL health services , *MEDICAL personnel , *PALATE surgery , *CLUSTER randomized controlled trials , *BEHAVIORAL sciences , *SURGERY safety measures , *RESEARCH implementation - Abstract
How can strategies to address mental ill-health in doctors and medical students be optimi... Mark Pearson1, Daniele Carrieri2,3, Karen Mattick2, Chrysanthi Papoutsi4, Simon Briscoe5, Geo... 1Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, Faculty of Health Science... Correspondence: Mark Pearson (mark.pearson@hyms.ac.uk) B Background: b The impact of the work environment on the mental health of doctors is internationally recognised. Implementation science in marginalised poorly resourced communities: a case study using... Dr Logan Manikam1,2, Shereen Allaham1,2, Dr Michelle Heys3, Dr Clare Llewellyn4, Dr Neha Batu... 1Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, UCL Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care... Correspondence: Logan Manikam (logan.manikam.10@ucl.ac.uk) B Background: b The first 1,000 days of a child's life are an important period for growth and cognitive development. Pragmatic parallel mixed methods investigation into implementation of home-based cardiac... Paulina Daw 1, Dr Jet Veldhuijzen van Zanten1, Alexander Harrison2, Dr Hasnain Dalal 3,4, Pro... 1School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK; 2Heal... Correspondence: Paulina Daw (pxd891@student.bham.ac.uk) B Background: b Low uptake of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a global problem, particularly for heart failure patients (HFPs), who are often older and more frail than other cardiac patients. Optimising the mining of electronic health records to implement health promotion apps vi... Zarnie Khadjesari1, Tracey Brown1 Alex Ramsey2, Henry Goodfellow3, Sherine El-Toukhy4, Lorien... 1School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK; 2Institute for Public Hea... Correspondence: Zarnie Khadjesari (z.khadjesari@uea.ac.uk) B Background: b Health promotion apps offer timely support, privacy and scalability, but are not currently delivered as part of routine patient care. [Extracted from the article]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Qualitative study on the implementation of professional pharmacy services in Australian community pharmacies using framework analysis
- Author
-
Moullin, Joanna C., Sabater Hernández, Daniel, and Benrimoj, Shalom Isaac
- Subjects
Health plan implementation ,Health services administration ,Communication ,Health services research ,Health services ,Pharmaceutical services - Abstract
Abbreviations: BCT, Behavioural change techniques taxonomy; BCW, Behavioural change wheel; CFIR, Consolidated framework for implementation research; EPOC, Cochrane effective practice and organisation of care; FISpH, Framework for the implementation of services in pharmacy; GIF, Generic implementation framework; KPI, Key performance indicator; TDF, Theoretical domains framework Background: Multiple studies have explored the implementation process and influences, however it appears there is no study investigating these influences across the stages of implementation. Community pharmacy is attempting to implement professional services (pharmaceutical care and other health services). The use of implementation theory may assist the achievement of widespread provision, support and integration. The objective was to investigate professional service implementation in community pharmacy to contextualise and advance the concepts of a generic implementation framework previously published. Methods: Purposeful sampling was used to investigate implementation across a range of levels of implementation in community pharmacies in Australia. Twenty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using a framework methodology. Data was charted using implementation stages as overarching themes and each stage was thematically analysed, to investigate the implementation process, the influences and their relationships. Secondary analyses were performed of the factors (barriers and facilitators) using an adapted version of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and implementation strategies and interventions, using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) discrete implementation strategy compilation. Results: Six stages emerged, labelled as development or discovery, exploration, preparation, testing, operation and sustainability. Within the stages, a range of implementation activities/steps and five overarching influences (pharmacys' direction and impetus, internal communication, staffing, community fit and support) were identified. The stages and activities were not applied strictly in a linear fashion. There was a trend towards the greater the number of activities considered, the greater the apparent integration into the pharmacy organization. Implementation factors varied over the implementation stages, and additional factors were added to the CFIR list and definitions modified/contextualised for pharmacy. Implementation strategies employed by pharmacies varied widely. Evaluations were lacking. Conclusions: The process of implementation and five overarching influences of professional services implementation in community pharmacy have been outlined. Framework analysis revealed, outside of the five overarching influences, factors influencing implementation varied across the implementation stages. It is proposed at each stage, for each domain, the factors, strategies and evaluations should be considered. The Framework for the Implementation of Services in Pharmacy incorporates the contextualisation of implementation science for pharmacy. The study was funded as part of a University of Technology Sydney (UTS) Research Excellence Scholarship (RES), comprising of an Australian Postgraduate Award (APA) Scholarship funded by the Australian Government, plus a Top-up funded by the University of Technology Sydney, received from the primary author (JCM).
- Published
- 2016
14. Leading for the long haul: a mixed-method evaluation of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS).
- Author
-
Ehrhart, Mark G., Torres, Elisa M., Green, Amy E., Trott, Elise M., Willging, Cathleen E., Moullin, Joanna C., and Aarons, Gregory A.
- Subjects
MEDICAL care ,QUALITATIVE research ,ACQUISITION of data ,QUANTITATIVE research ,PUBLIC health - Abstract
Background: Despite our progress in understanding the organizational context for implementation and specifically the role of leadership in implementation, its role in sustainment has received little attention. This paper took a mixed-method approach to examine leadership during the sustainment phase of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework. Utilizing the Implementation Leadership Scale as a foundation, we sought to develop a short, practical measure of sustainment leadership that can be used for both applied and research purposes.Methods: Data for this study were collected as a part of a larger mixed-method study of evidence-based intervention, SafeCare®, sustainment. Quantitative data were collected from 157 providers using web-based surveys. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the factor structure of the Sustainment Leadership Scale (SLS). Qualitative data were collected from 95 providers who participated in one of 15 focus groups. A framework approach guided qualitative data analysis. Mixed-method integration was also utilized to examine convergence of quantitative and qualitative findings.Results: Confirmatory factor analysis supported the a priori higher order factor structure of the SLS with subscales indicating a single higher order sustainment leadership factor. The SLS demonstrated excellent internal consistency reliability. Qualitative analyses offered support for the dimensions of sustainment leadership captured by the quantitative measure, in addition to uncovering a fifth possible factor, available leadership.Conclusions: This study found qualitative and quantitative support for the pragmatic SLS measure. The SLS can be used for assessing leadership of first-level leaders to understand how staff perceive leadership during sustainment and to suggest areas where leaders could direct more attention in order to increase the likelihood that EBIs are institutionalized into the normal functioning of the organization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Testing the leadership and organizational change for implementation (LOCI) intervention in substance abuse treatment: a cluster randomized trial study protocol.
- Author
-
Aarons, Gregory A., Ehrhart, Mark G., Moullin, Joanna C., Torres, Elisa M., and Green, Amy E.
- Subjects
SUBSTANCE abuse treatment ,ORGANIZATIONAL change ,LEADERSHIP ,INSTITUTIONAL environment ,MOTIVATIONAL interviewing ,360-degree feedback (Rating of employees) ,MEDICAL education ,ATTITUDE (Psychology) ,COMPARATIVE studies ,DIFFUSION of innovations ,EMPLOYEE orientation ,RESEARCH methodology ,MEDICAL cooperation ,MEDICAL personnel ,MOTIVATION (Psychology) ,RESEARCH ,RESEARCH funding ,EVIDENCE-based medicine ,PROFESSIONAL practice ,EVALUATION research ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials - Abstract
Background: Evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation represents a strategic change in organizations that requires effective leadership and alignment of leadership and organizational support across organizational levels. As such, there is a need for combining leadership development with organizational strategies to support organizational climate conducive to EBP implementation. The leadership and organizational change for implementation (LOCI) intervention includes leadership training for workgroup leaders, ongoing implementation leadership coaching, 360° assessment, and strategic planning with top and middle management regarding how they can support workgroup leaders in developing a positive EBP implementation climate.Methods: This test of the LOCI intervention will take place in conjunction with the implementation of motivational interviewing (MI) in 60 substance use disorder treatment programs in California, USA. Participants will include agency executives, 60 program leaders, and approximately 360 treatment staff. LOCI will be tested using a multiple cohort, cluster randomized trial that randomizes workgroups (i.e., programs) within agency to either LOCI or a webinar leadership training control condition in three consecutive cohorts. The LOCI intervention is 12 months, and the webinar control intervention takes place in months 1, 5, and 8, for each cohort. Web-based surveys of staff and supervisors will be used to collect data on leadership, implementation climate, provider attitudes, and citizenship. Audio recordings of counseling sessions will be coded for MI fidelity. The unit of analysis will be the workgroup, randomized by site within agency and with care taken that co-located workgroups are assigned to the same condition to avoid contamination. Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) will be used to analyze the data to account for the nested data structure.Discussion: LOCI has been developed to be a feasible and effective approach for organizations to create a positive climate and fertile context for EBP implementation. The approach seeks to cultivate and sustain both effective general and implementation leadership as well as organizational strategies and support that will remain after the study has ended. Development of a positive implementation climate for MI should result in more positive service provider attitudes and behaviors related to the use of MI and, ultimately, higher fidelity in the use of MI.Trial Registration: This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03042832 ), 2 February 2017, retrospectively registered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework.
- Author
-
Moullin, Joanna C., Sabater-Hernández, Daniel, Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando, and Benrimoj, Shalom I.
- Subjects
- *
MEDICAL care research , *PSEUDOSCIENCE , *HEALTH education , *HEALTH behavior , *PHYSIOGNOMY - Abstract
Background: Implementation science and knowledge translation have developed across multiple disciplines with the common aim of bringing innovations to practice. Numerous implementation frameworks, models, and theories have been developed to target a diverse array of innovations. As such, it is plausible that not all frameworks include the full range of concepts now thought to be involved in implementation. Users face the decision of selecting a single or combining multiple implementation frameworks. To aid this decision, the aim of this review was to assess the comprehensiveness of existing frameworks. Methods: A systematic search was undertaken in PubMed to identify implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare published from 2004 to May 2013. Additionally, titles and abstracts from Implementation Science journal and references from identified papers were reviewed. The orientation, type, and presence of stages and domains, along with the degree of inclusion and depth of analysis of factors, strategies, and evaluations of implementation of included frameworks were analysed. Results: Frameworks were assessed individually and grouped according to their targeted innovation. Frameworks for particular innovations had similar settings, end-users, and 'type' (descriptive, prescriptive, explanatory, or predictive). On the whole, frameworks were descriptive and explanatory more often than prescriptive and predictive. A small number of the reviewed frameworks covered an implementation concept(s) in detail, however, overall, there was limited degree and depth of analysis of implementation concepts. The core implementation concepts across the frameworks were collated to form a Generic Implementation Framework, which includes the process of implementation (often portrayed as a series of stages and/or steps), the innovation to be implemented, the context in which the implementation is to occur (divided into a range of domains), and influencing factors, strategies, and evaluations. Conclusions: The selection of implementation framework(s) should be based not solely on the healthcare innovation to be implemented, but include other aspects of the framework's orientation, e.g., the setting and end-user, as well as the degree of inclusion and depth of analysis of the implementation concepts. The resulting generic structure provides researchers, policy-makers, health administrators, and practitioners a base that can be used as guidance for their implementation efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Implementing a case management intervention for frequent users of the emergency department (I-CaM): an effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial study protocol.
- Author
-
Grazioli, Véronique S., Moullin, Joanna C., Kasztura, Miriam, Canepa-Allen, Marina, Hugli, Olivier, Griffin, Judy, Vu, Francis, Hudon, Catherine, Jackson, Yves, Wolff, Hans, Burnand, Bernard, Daeppen, Jean-Bernard, and Bodenmann, Patrick
- Subjects
- *
EMERGENCY management , *PUBLIC health , *HUMAN services , *QUALITY of life , *PUBLIC hospitals - Abstract
Background: ED overcrowding represents a significant public health problem in developed countries. Frequent users of the emergency departments (FUEDs; reporting 5 or more ED visits in the past year) are often affected by medical, psychological, social, and substance use problems and account for a disproportionately high number of ED visits. Past research indicates that case management (CM) interventions are a promising way to reduce ED overcrowding and improve FUEDs' quality of life. There is, however, very limited knowledge about how to disseminate and implement this intervention on a large scale to diverse clinical settings, including community hospitals and non-academic centers. This paper describes the protocol of a research project aiming to implement a CM intervention tailored to FUEDs in the public hospitals with ED in the French-speaking region of Switzerland and evaluate both the implementation process and effectiveness of the CM intervention.Methods: This research project uses a hybrid study design assessing both implementation and clinical outcomes. The implementation part of the study uses mixed methods a) to describe quantitatively and qualitatively factors that influence the implementation process, and b) to examine implementation effectiveness. The clinical part of the study uses a within-subject design (pre-post intervention) to evaluate participants' trajectories on clinical variables (e.g., quality of life, ED use) after receiving the CM intervention. We designed the study based on two implementation science frameworks. The Generic Implementation Framework guided the overall research protocol design, whereas the RE-AIM (reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation and maintenance) framework guided the implementation and effectiveness evaluations.Discussion: This research project will contribute to implementation science by providing key insights into the processes of implementing CM into broader practice. This research project is also likely to have both clinical and public health implications.Trial Registration: NCT03641274 , Registered 20 August 2018. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Systematic review of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework.
- Author
-
Moullin, Joanna C., Dickson, Kelsey S., Stadnick, Nicole A., Rabin, Borsika, and Aarons, Gregory A.
- Subjects
- *
SYSTEMATIC reviews , *EVIDENCE-based medicine , *DIFFUSION of innovations , *TECHNOLOGICAL innovations , *MEDICAL care - Abstract
Background: Effective implementation of evidence-based practices (EBPs) remains a significant challenge. Numerous existing models and frameworks identify key factors and processes to facilitate implementation. However, there is a need to better understand how individual models and frameworks are applied in research projects, how they can support the implementation process, and how they might advance implementation science. This systematic review examines and describes the research application of a widely used implementation framework, the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework.Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to identify and evaluate the use of the EPIS framework in implementation efforts. Citation searches in PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, ERIC, Web of Science, Social Sciences Index, and Google Scholar databases were undertaken. Data extraction included the objective, language, country, setting, sector, EBP, study design, methodology, level(s) of data collection, unit(s) of analysis, use of EPIS (i.e., purpose), implementation factors and processes, EPIS stages, implementation strategy, implementation outcomes, and overall depth of EPIS use (rated on a 1-5 scale).Results: In total, 762 full-text articles were screened by four reviewers, resulting in inclusion of 67 articles, representing 49 unique research projects. All included projects were conducted in public sector settings. The majority of projects (73%) investigated the implementation of a specific EBP. The majority of projects (90%) examined inner context factors, 57% examined outer context factors, 37% examined innovation factors, and 31% bridging factors (i.e., factors that cross or link the outer system and inner organizational context). On average, projects measured EPIS factors across two of the EPIS phases (M = 2.02), with the most frequent phase being Implementation (73%). On average, the overall depth of EPIS inclusion was moderate (2.8 out of 5).Conclusion: This systematic review enumerated multiple settings and ways the EPIS framework has been applied in implementation research projects, and summarized promising characteristics and strengths of the framework, illustrated with examples. Recommendations for future use include more precise operationalization of factors, increased depth and breadth of application, development of aligned measures, and broadening of user networks. Additional resources supporting the operationalization of EPIS are available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Advancing the pragmatic measurement of sustainment: a narrative review of measures.
- Author
-
Moullin JC, Sklar M, Green A, Dickson KS, Stadnick NA, Reeder K, and Aarons GA
- Abstract
Background: Sustainment, an outcome indicating an intervention continues to be implemented over time, has been comparatively less studied than other phases of the implementation process. This may be because of methodological difficulties, funding cycles, and minimal attention to theories and measurement of sustainment. This review synthesizes the literature on sustainment measures, evaluates the qualities of each measure, and highlights the strengths and gaps in existing sustainment measures. Results of the review will inform recommendations for the development of a pragmatic, valid, and reliable measure of sustainment., Methods: A narrative review of published sustainment outcome and sustainability measures (i.e., factors that influence sustainment) was conducted, including appraising measures in the Society of Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) instrument review project (IRP) and the Dissemination and Implementation Grid-Enabled Measures database initiative (GEM-D&I). The narrative review used a snowballing strategy by searching the reference sections of literature reviews and definitions of sustainability and sustainment. Measures used frequently and judged to be comprehensive and/or validated by a team of implementation scientists were extracted for analysis., Results: Eleven measures were evaluated. Three of the included measures were found in the SIRC-IRP, three in the GEM-D&I database, (one measure was in both databases) and six were identified in our additional searches. Thirteen constructs relating to sustainment were coded from selected measures. Measures covered a range of determinants for sustainment (i.e., construct of sustainability) as well as constructs of sustainment as an outcome. Strengths of the measures included, development by expert panels knowledgeable about particular interventions, fields or contexts, and utility in specific scenarios. A number of limitations were found in the measures analyzed including inadequate assessment of psychometric characteristics, being overly intervention or context specific, being lengthy and/or complex, and focusing on outer context factors., Conclusion: There is a lack of pragmatic and psychometrically sound measures of sustainment that can be completed by implementation stakeholders within inner context settings (e.g., frontline providers, supervisors)., Competing Interests: Competing interestsGAA is an Associate Editor of Implementation Science; all decisions on this paper were made by another editor. The authors declare that they have no other competing interests., (© The Author(s) 2020.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Qualitative study on the implementation of professional pharmacy services in Australian community pharmacies using framework analysis.
- Author
-
Moullin JC, Sabater-Hernández D, and Benrimoj SI
- Subjects
- Australia, Health Plan Implementation, Health Services Research, Interviews as Topic, Pharmacists, Qualitative Research, Community Pharmacy Services organization & administration, Pharmacies organization & administration
- Abstract
Background: Multiple studies have explored the implementation process and influences, however it appears there is no study investigating these influences across the stages of implementation. Community pharmacy is attempting to implement professional services (pharmaceutical care and other health services). The use of implementation theory may assist the achievement of widespread provision, support and integration. The objective was to investigate professional service implementation in community pharmacy to contextualise and advance the concepts of a generic implementation framework previously published., Methods: Purposeful sampling was used to investigate implementation across a range of levels of implementation in community pharmacies in Australia. Twenty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using a framework methodology. Data was charted using implementation stages as overarching themes and each stage was thematically analysed, to investigate the implementation process, the influences and their relationships. Secondary analyses were performed of the factors (barriers and facilitators) using an adapted version of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and implementation strategies and interventions, using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) discrete implementation strategy compilation., Results: Six stages emerged, labelled as development or discovery, exploration, preparation, testing, operation and sustainability. Within the stages, a range of implementation activities/steps and five overarching influences (pharmacys' direction and impetus, internal communication, staffing, community fit and support) were identified. The stages and activities were not applied strictly in a linear fashion. There was a trend towards the greater the number of activities considered, the greater the apparent integration into the pharmacy organization. Implementation factors varied over the implementation stages, and additional factors were added to the CFIR list and definitions modified/contextualised for pharmacy. Implementation strategies employed by pharmacies varied widely. Evaluations were lacking., Conclusions: The process of implementation and five overarching influences of professional services implementation in community pharmacy have been outlined. Framework analysis revealed, outside of the five overarching influences, factors influencing implementation varied across the implementation stages. It is proposed at each stage, for each domain, the factors, strategies and evaluations should be considered. The Framework for the Implementation of Services in Pharmacy incorporates the contextualisation of implementation science for pharmacy.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.