Search

Background: Short-term studies have demonstrated good surgical outcomes after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients, but there is a paucity of literature focused on middle-term results, especially regarding patterns of loss of correction. The objective of this study is to assess the durability of surgical outcomes and the patterns of loss of correction in thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to AS following lumbar PSO with over 5-year follow-up.Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 155 consecutive AS patients undergoing lumbar PSO from January 2001 to December 2011. Twenty-four patients were included with an average follow-up of 6.9 years (range, 5-15 years). Radiographical evaluations included global kyphosis (GK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis, spinal-sacral angle, kyphosis of proximal non-fused segments (KPNS), angle of fused segments (AFS), osteotomized vertebra angle (OVA), distal intervertebral disc wedging (DIDW) and proximal junctional angle. Meanwhile, clinical outcomes were assessed by the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and Numerical rating scale (NRS).Results: The average correction per PSO segment was 34.9°. Significant improvement in sagittal parameters were found postoperatively, and no obvious deterioration was noticed during the follow-up. Mild loss of correction in GK (2.82°) and LL (3.77°) were observed at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). The KPNS and DIDW increased from 26° and -5.0° postoperatively to 30° and -2.2° at the final follow-up (P < 0.05), respectively. In contrast, no significant diminishment was identified in OVA and AFS (P > 0.05). The ODI and NRS improved significantly from 20.6 and 6.6 preoperatively to 5.9 and 2.3 at the final follow-up (P < 0.05).Conclusions: PSO is an effective procedure for treating AS-related thoracolumbar kyphosis and can maintain sustained surgical outcomes during the middle-term follow-up. The loss of correction was mainly attributable to non-instrumented segments without fully ossified bridging syndesmophyte in the thoracolumbar region instead of instrumented levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Progesterone supplementation after in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) can improve the rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth, but the optimal duration of treatment remains controversial. The objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate the effects of early progesterone cessation on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing IVF/ICSI. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Chinese biomedicine (CBM) literature database, and the Wanfang database. The final search was performed in July 2012. All available randomised trials that compared the effects of early progesterone cessation with progesterone continuation during early pregnancy after IVF/ICSI were included. The main outcome measures were live birth rate, miscarriage rate and ongoing pregnancy rate. Fixed or random-effects models were chosen to calculate the risk ratio (RR). Results: Six eligible studies with a total of 1,201 randomised participants were included in the final analysis. No statistically significant differences were detected between patients who underwent early progesterone cessation and those who received progesterone continuation for luteal phase support in terms of live birth rate (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.86-1.05), miscarriage rate (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.74-1.38) or ongoing pregnancy rate (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.90-1.05). These results did not change after a sensitivity analysis. Conclusions: The currently available evidence suggests that progesterone supplementation beyond the first positive hCG test after IVF/ICSI might generally be unnecessary, although large-scale randomised controlled trials are needed to strengthen this conclusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]