1. Clinical comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic technique versus open microdiscectomy for single-level lumbar discectomy: a multicenter, retrospective analysis
- Author
-
Young-Ho Hong, Sang-Soo Kang, Seung-Kook Kim, Seung-Woo Park, and Su-Chan Lee
- Subjects
Male ,Microsurgery ,lcsh:Diseases of the musculoskeletal system ,Lumbar disc ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Intervertebral Disc Degeneration ,Spinal disease ,Arthroscopy ,0302 clinical medicine ,Postoperative Complications ,lcsh:Orthopedic surgery ,Back pain ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,030222 orthopedics ,Lumbar Vertebrae ,Middle Aged ,Oswestry Disability Index ,Minimally invasive spine surgery ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,Intervertebral Disc Displacement ,Research Article ,Diskectomy ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Visual analogue scale ,UBE ,Degenerative disc disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,Patient satisfaction ,Herniated lumbar disc ,Discectomy ,medicine ,Humans ,BESS ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,business.industry ,Perioperative ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,lcsh:RD701-811 ,MISS ,Case-Control Studies ,Neuroendoscopy ,lcsh:RC925-935 ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Endoscopic spine surgery - Abstract
Background The unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique is a minimally invasive procedure for spinal surgery, while open microscopic discectomy is the most common surgical treatment for ruptured or herniated discs of the lumbar spine. A new endoscopic technique that uses a UBE approach has been applied to conventional arthroscopic systems for the treatment of spinal disease. In this study, we aimed to compare and evaluate the perioperative parameters and clinical outcomes, including recovery from surgery, pain and life quality modification, patient’s satisfaction, and complications, between UBE and open lumbar microdiscectomy (OLM) for single-level discectomy procedures. Methods This study included 141 patients with degenerative disc disease requiring discectomy at a single level from L2–L3 to L5–S1. A total of 60 and 81 patients underwent UBE and OLM, respectively. Analysis was based on comparison of perioperative metrics, operation time (OT); estimated blood loss (EBL); length of hospital stay (HS); clinical outcomes, including assessment using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); patient satisfaction (the MacNab score); and the incidence of reoperation and complications. Results The study cohort was 56.7% women, and the mean patient age was 50.98 ± 18.23 years. The mean VAS (the back and leg), MacNab score, and ODI improved significantly from the preoperative period to the last follow-up (12.92 ± 3.92) in both groups (p
- Published
- 2018