Search

Background: Up to now, the optimal duration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has not been evaluated in prospective studies. However, current clinical practice requires decisions to be made regarding the duration of ICI in complete responders., Material and Methods: A survey was sent to 80 DeCOG skin cancer centers to assess how decisions are made on treatment duration of ICI in melanoma after having reached complete response, and staging intervals after ICI discontinuation. All responses received by March 10, 2024 (51 centers) were included., Results: The duration of ICI after having achieved complete remission varies between centers from three to 36 months. In total, 66% of the DeCOG centers continue treatment for up to 6 months, after having achieved complete remission (CR) with ICI. In the first year after discontinuation of ICI, most centers perform staging intervals (CT/MRI) every 3 months. More than 60% of centers continue staging at least once per year even in the 4th and 5th year after discontinuation., Conclusions: There are significant differences between the centers regarding staging intervals and duration of ICI upon CR. Prospective studies are necessary to determine the optimal time point of ICI discontinuation and follow-up., (© 2025 The Author(s). Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft.)

Background: Interferon-alpha is an important therapeutic option for the treatment of the cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL). Since the approved recombinant interferon-α-2a (IFN-α2a) has no longer been produced since January 2020, pegylated interferon-α2a (pegIFN-α2a) can be used as an alternative treatment, even though it is not approved for the treatment of CTCL. The aim of this multicentre study was to generate comprehensive data on the efficacy and tolerability of pegIFN-α2a in the treatment of CTCL., Patients and Methods: A multicenter retrospective study was conducted with 70 patients with CTCL from twelve German skin centers., Results: In total, 70 patients were included in the study, with 57.2% male and a mean age of 58.8 ± 14.9 years. Mycosis fungoides was present in 71.4% of cases and Sézary Syndrome in 28.6%. An overall response rate of 55.2% was observed with pegIFNα-2a therapy. In 50% of cases, therapy was discontinued after 63.6 ± 33.5 weeks. The most common reason for discontinuation was adverse events, which occurred in 68.6% of cases and which were classified as severe in 29.2%. Blood count changes, fatigue and liver toxicity occurred most frequently., Conclusions: Our analysis provides comprehensive data on the efficacy and tolerability of pegIFNα-2a therapy in patients with CTCL. In terms of response rates and side effect profile, pegIFNα-2a appears to be comparable to IFN-α2a therapy., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft published by Wiley‐VCH GmbH on behalf of Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft.)

Background and Objectives: Dermatoscopy may be hindered by body hair, and the development of an automated hair removal algorithm (AuHRA) might improve the diagnostic accuracy. However, the physicians' exact level of hindrance and the clinical benefit attained by AuHRA has not been assessed. The objectives of this study are to quantify the physicians' level of hindrance by body hair and the level of improvement in the visibility of underlying dermatoscopic patterns after application of AuHRA to digital images of hair-covered nevi., Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional reader study including 59 sets of dermatoscopic images of benign nevi that were presented to six dermatologists. Each set included three images of one individual nevus (unshaved/physically shaved/digitally shaved with AuHRA), which were compared to each other within each set to assess the level of improvement caused by hair removal., Results: In comparison to unshaved lesions, dermatologists attributed the highest mean level of improvement to a physical shave (+1.36, p < 0.001) followed by AuHRA's digital shave (+0.79, p < 0.001). The majority of dermatologists considered the application of AuHRA as helpful and confirmed a medical need., Conclusions: The dermatologists in our study confirmed a substantial impairment of the dermatoscopic examination by body hair. We demonstrated a clinical benefit attained by AuHRA in comparison to unshaved or physically shaved lesions., (© 2019 Deutsche Dermatologische Gesellschaft (DDG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)