Search

Fish eDNA metabarcoding is usually performed from filtered water samples. The volume of filtered water depends on the study scope and can rapidly become time consuming according to the number of samples that have to be processed. To avoid time allocated to filtration, passive DNA samplers have been used to recover fish eDNA from marine environments faster. In freshwater ecosystems, aquatic biofilms were used to catch eDNA from macroinvertebrates. Here, we test the capacity of aquatic biofilms to entrap fish eDNA in a large lake and, therefore, the possibility to perform fish eDNA metabarcoding from this matrix compared to the traditional fish eDNA approach from filtered water samples. Methodological aspects of the use of aquatic biofilms for fish eDNA metabarcoding (e.g. PCR replicates, biological replicates, bioinformatics pipeline, reference database and taxonomic assignment) were validated against a mock community. When using biofilms from habitats sheltered from wind and waves, biofilm and water approach provided similar inventories. Richness and diversity were comparable between both approaches. Approaches differed only for rare taxa. Our results illustrate the capacity of aquatic biofilms to act as passive eDNA samplers of fish eDNA and, therefore, the possibility to use biofilms to monitor fish communities efficiently from biofilms. Furthermore, our results open up avenues of research to study a diversity of biological groups (among which bioindicators as diatoms, macroinvertebrates and fish) from eDNA isolated from a single environmental matrix reducing sampling efforts, analysis time and costs., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

DNA metabarcoding has been introduced as a revolutionary way to identify organisms and monitor ecosystems. However, the potential of this approach for biomonitoring remains partially unfulfilled because a significant part of the sampled DNA cannot be affiliated to species due to incomplete reference libraries. Thus, biotic indices, which are based on the estimated abundances of species in a community and their ecological profiles, can be inaccurate. We propose to compute biotic indices using phylogenetic imputation of operational taxonomic units (OTUs') ecological profiles (OTU-PITI approach). First, OTUs sequences are inserted within a reference phylogeny. Second, OTUs' ecological profiles are estimated on the basis of their phylogenetic relationships with reference species whose ecology is known. Based on these ecological profiles, biotic indices can be computed using all available OTUs. Using freshwater diatoms as a case study, we show that short DNA barcodes can be placed accurately within a phylogeny and their ecological preferences estimated with a satisfactory level of precision. In the light of these results, we tested the approach with a data set of 139 environmental samples of benthic river diatoms for which the same biotic index (specific sensitivity index) was calculated using (a) traditional microscopy, (b) OTUs with taxonomic assignment approach, (c) OTUs with phylogenetic estimation of ecological profiles (OTU-PITI) and (d) OTU with taxonomic assignment completed by the phylogenetic approach (OTU-PITI) for unclassified OTUs. Using traditional microscopy as a reference, we found that the combination of the OTUs' taxonomic assignment completed by the phylogenetic method performed satisfactorily and substantially better than the other methods tested., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)