1. Effect of wound irrigation on the prevention of surgical site infections: A meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Fu C, Meng L, Ma M, Li N, and Zhang J
- Subjects
- Humans, Surgical Wound Infection prevention & control, Therapeutic Irrigation methods, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Odds Ratio, Povidone-Iodine therapeutic use, Anti-Infective Agents, Local therapeutic use
- Abstract
We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of wound irrigation on the prevention of surgical site infections. A systematic literature search up to January 2022 was done and 24 studies included 4967 subjects under surgery at the start of the study; antibiotic irrigation was used with 1372 of them, 1261 were aqueous povidone-iodine irrigation, and 2334 were saline irrigation or no irrigation for surgical site infections prevention in all surgical populations. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the effect of different wound irrigation on the prevention of surgical site infections by the dichotomous method with a random or fixed-influence model. Antibiotic irrigation had significantly lower surgical site infections in all surgical populations (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.36-0.62, P < .001) compared with saline irrigation or no irrigation for the subject under surgery. Aqueous povidone-iodine irrigation had significantly lower surgical site infections in all surgical populations (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.81, P = .01) compared with saline irrigation or no irrigation for the subject under surgery. Antibiotic irrigation and aqueous povidone-iodine irrigation significantly lowered surgical site infections in all surgical populations compared with saline irrigation or no irrigation for the subject under surgery. Further studies are required., (© 2022 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF