Search

Introduction: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been found to prolong survival in selected patients with peritoneal disease, but the extent of cytoreduction and chemoperfusion can result in systemic toxicities. We evaluate the incidence of perioperative hematological complications and its associated risk factors., Methods: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of CRS-HIPEC cases between April 2001 and October 2016 was performed. Patients were stratified based on the clinicopathological characteristics, perioperative incidence, grade, and duration of leukopenia (white blood cells < 4000/mm 3 ), neutropenia (absolute neutrophils < 2000/mm 3 ), and thrombocytopenia (platelets < 140 000/mm 3 )., Results: Two hundred and thirty-five CRS-HIPEC were performed in 220 patients with peritoneal metastasis of colorectal, ovarian, primary peritoneal, appendiceal, or mesothelioma origins. The incidences of leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were 15.3%, 3.8%, and 37.9%, respectively. Median time to onset was 1 day (0-16 days), 0 day (0-2 days), and 1 day (1-2 days), respectively, after operation. Median duration of leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia was 1 day (1-3 days), 1 day (1-2days), and 3 days (range 0-16 days), respectively. Age > 60 (odds ratio [OR] 0.229 [95% CI: 0.105-0.502], P < .001) and the use of prior chemotherapy (OR 2.46 [95% CI: 1.24, 4.83], P = .010) were independent risk factors for thrombocytopenia on multivariable logistic regression., Conclusion: Hematological toxicities are common after hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with thrombocytopenia being most common. Patients with age > 60, and who have undergone chemotherapy, are at risk of these toxicities and should be closely monitored post CRS-HIPEC., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Aim: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) is known to improve survival in selected patients with peritoneal metastasis. However, there is limited data supporting the role of CRS and HIPEC in elderly patients (≥65 years old)., Methods: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC between April 2001 and July 2015 from a single institution was performed. Patients were divided into two groups non-elderly (<65 years old), and elderly (≥65 years old). Clinico- pathological parameters, morbidity and overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of the patients were compared., Results: A total of 177 patients (median age 52, range 9-74) underwent CRS-HIPEC with curative intent. There were 159 non-elderly patients and 18 elderly patients. Median PCI scores were 12 (0-39) for the non- elderly patients and 11 (1-29) for the elderly patients (p=0.77). High-grade complications occurred in 39 non-elderly patients (24.5%) and 8 elderly patients (44.4%) (p=0.79), while 58 non-elderly patients (38.7%) and 7 elderly patients (41.2%) stayed in ICU for more than 1 day (p=0.69). There was no difference in the 30-day mortality between the two groups (0% vs. 0%, p=1). After a median follow-up of 16 months for all patients, there was no difference in 5-years OS (51.0% vs. 59.6%, p=0.88) and 5-years DFS (23.3% vs. 53.3%, p=0.60) between non-elderly and elderly patients., Conclusions: Surgical outcomes after CRS-HIPEC do not differ significantly between non-elderly and elderly patients. Hence, age should not be a contraindication in selecting patients for CRS and HIPEC., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)