Search

Objectives: Ghrelin is a 28-amino-acid peptide, predominantly produced by the stomach. It displays a strong GH-releasing activity mediated by the hypothalamus-pituitary GH secretagogue (GHS)-receptor (GHS-R). There are different studies that suggest the importance of ghrelin in feeding and weight homeostasis. In obesity there is a markedly decreased GH secretion. For both children and adults, the greater the body mass index (BMI), the lower the GH response to provocative stimuli, including the response to GHRH. However, the response to the natural GH secretaogogue ghrelin is unclear at the present time. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the GH response to ghrelin alone or combined with GHRH in a group of obese patients, in order to further understand the deranged GH secretory mechanisms in obesity and to clarify the mechanism of action of ghrelin., Patients and Measurements: Six obese female patients (31 +/- 3.4 years) with a BMI of 36.1 +/- 7.7 kg/m(2) were studied. As a control group, six normal nonobese female subjects of similar age and sex were studied. Four tests were performed: placebo, GHRH [1 micro g/kg, no more than 100 micro g, intravenous (i.v.)], ghrelin (1 micro g/kg, no more than 100 micro g, i.v.) and GHRH (1 micro g/kg, no more than 100 micro g, i.v.) plus ghrelin (1 micro g/kg, no more than 100 micro g, i.v.). Blood samples were taken at appropriate intervals for determination of GH. Statistical analyses were performed by Wilcoxon and by Mann-Whitney tests., Results: After GHRH, the median peak GH secretion in obese patients was 2.4 micro g/l (range 0.9-8.9 micro g/l). Ghrelin-induced GH secretion showed in obese patients a median peak of 24.4 micro g/l (range 7.4-85.0 micro g/l), significantly greater than the response after GHRH (P < 0.05). After the combined administration of GHRH plus ghrelin in obese patients the median peak GH secretion was 39.9 micro g/l (range 19.2-120.0 micro g/l), significantly greater than the response after GHRH (P < 0.05) or ghrelin (P < 0.05). GHRH-induced GH secretion in normal control subjects showed a median peak of 25.0 micro g/l (range 16.5-33.4 micro g/l). Ghrelin-induced GH secretion in normal showed a median peak of 68.5 micro g/l (range 22.5-119.5 micro g/l), significantly greater than the response after GHRH (P < 0.05). After the combined administration of GHRH plus ghrelin, in normal subjects the median peak GH secretion was 117.8 micro g/l (range 77.5-280.1 micro g/l), significantly greater than the response after GHRH or ghrelin alone (P < 0.05). When we compare the response of normal and obese patients, after GHRH alone, it was markedly decreased in obese people when compared with normal patients (P < 0.05) with a median GH peak of 25.0 micro g/l (range 16.5-33.4 micro g/l) and 2.4 micro g/l (range 0.9-8.9 micro g/l) for normal and obese patients, respectively. When we compare the response of normal and obese patients, after ghrelin alone or GHRH plus ghrelin, it was only blunted in obese subjects when compared with normal subjects with a median GH peak of 68.5 micro g/l (range 22.5-119.5 micro g/l) and 24.4 micro g/l (range 7.4-85 micro g/l) for normal and obese subjects, respectively, after ghrelin alone (P < 0.05) and a median GH peak of 117.8 micro g/l (range 77.5-280.1 micro g/l) and 39.9 micro g/l (range 19.2-120.0 micro g/l) for normal and obese patients, respectively, after GHRH plus ghrelin (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: This study has demonstrated a massive GH response to ghrelin alone or combined with GHRH in obese patients, suggesting that altered ghrelin secretion could play a major role in the blunted GH secretion present in obese patients.

Objective: Little is known about the relative circulating concentrations of growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) 1-44 NH2 and 1-40 OH in response to dynamic GH stimulation. We therefore studied the concentrations of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) 1-44 NH2 and 1-40 OH in the peripheral plasma of normal male subjects during GH stimulation tests., Design: Tests were performed at 0900 h after an overnight fast. Stimulation tests, commenced at 0 minutes, included alpha-adrenergic activation with adrenaline (10 micrograms/min from 0 to 30 minutes) following beta-blockade with propranolol (1.5 mg/min from -10 to 0 minutes), alpha 2-adrenergic activation with clonidine 150 micrograms i.v., insulin hypoglycaemia (0.15 U/kg soluble insulin), L-arginine infusion (30 g from 0 to 30 minutes), L-dopa (500 mg orally) and oral glucose (100 g)., Subjects: Groups of healthy male volunteers aged 20-42 years, all within 10% of ideal body weight., Measurements: Serum GH and plasma GHRH 1-44 NH2 and 1-40 OH were measured at intervals for between 60 and 390 minutes, depending on the stimulation test., Results: There were no significant changes in either GHRH 1-44 or 1-40 following alpha-adrenergic activation with propranolol/adrenaline infusion, alpha 2-adrenergic activation with i.v. clonidine, insulin-induced hypoglycaemia or arginine infusion despite the expected rise in GH levels. After oral glucose, GH was initially suppressed with a late rise. There were no changes in GHRH 1-44 or 1-40 levels during either phase of this response. After L-dopa GH levels peaked at 90 minutes, 24.5 +/- 11.0 mU/l (mean +/- SEM). At 0 minutes GHRH 1-44 and 1-40 levels were 3.25 +/- 0.89 and 4.93 +/- 1.28 pmol/l respectively and rose in both cases, peaking at 60 minutes at 4.23 +/- 1.01 and 7.55 +/- 1.80 pmol/l (P < 0.05). At no time was there any evidence of differential secretion of GHRH 1-44 or 1-40., Conclusions: We have confirmed previous studies demonstrating a small rise in GHRH before the GH response to L-dopa. However, in all other situations of pharmacological stimulation of GH release we were unable to detect any significant changes in GHRH 1-44 or 1-40 levels. It seems most likely that peripheral GHRH does not reflect hypothalamic secretion. As yet there is no evidence for differential release of GHRH 1-44 and 1-40.

A 42-year-old woman with a family history of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) presented with symptomatic hypoglycaemia and peptic ulceration. Investigation revealed an insulinoma, hyperparathyroidism, hypercalcitoninaemia with a positive pentagastrin stimulation test, acromegaly due to a GRF-oma, hyperprolactinaemia and normal serum gastrin levels. Five pancreatic tumours were removed at laparotomy and immunostaining was positive for insulin, calcitonin, somatostatin and glucagon. Post-operatively she developed elevated serum gastrin levels and gross peptic ulceration, despite H2-blockers, and died of gastro-intestinal haemorrhage suggesting that removal of the somatostatinoma may have allowed increased gastrin secretion from a gastrinoma. This case emphasizes the importance of measuring a wide variety of tumour marker peptides in MEN 1 and suggests that caution is required in interpretation of the pentagastrin stimulation test in such cases. Patients with MEN 1 and known peptic ulceration may require perioperative omeprazole treatment even if serum gastrin levels are normal.

Objective: We wished to investigate whether thyrotoxicosis can influence the cholinergic modulation of GH secretion., Design: Pyridostigmine was given orally, then GHRH injected i.v., and levels were measured. In a separate study, pirenzepine was injected i.v., then GHRH, and growth hormone levels were measured., Patients: Thyrotoxic patients were compared with normal subjects., Measurements: GH was measured from -30 to +120 minutes at intervals of 15 minutes., Results: Pyridostigmine markedly increased GH responses to GHRH in normal subjects, but not in thyrotoxic patients. Pirenzepine abolished the GH response to GHRH in thyrotoxic patients., Conclusions: GH responses to GHRH in hyperthyroid patients were suppressed by cholinergic muscarinic receptor blockade with pirenzepine. Activation of cholinergic pathways with pyridostigmine did not increase GH responses to GHRH in these patients. This may be a consequence of increased hypothalamic cholinergic function or reduced hypothalamic GHRH activity in hyperthyroidism. Our findings demonstrate a further mechanism by means of which thyroid status may affect the secretory activity of the somatotroph.

Objective: The aim was to investigate the serum levels of growth hormone releasing hormone and GH in patients with lung carcinoma. DESIGN After an overnight fast a plasma sample was collected for determination of growth hormone releasing hormone and GH., Patients: The investigation was performed in 28 patients with non small cell lung carcinoma, in 44 patients with small cell lung carcinoma, and 10 patients with non malignant lung disease. A group of 37 normal subjects served as control., Measurements: Growth hormone releasing hormone and GH were determined by radioimmunoassay., Results: Patients with small cell lung carcinoma showed higher plasma growth hormone releasing hormone levels (49 +/- 9.4 ng/l) than control subjects (16.3 +/- 2.1 ng/l; P less than 0.05), patients with non small cell lung carcinoma (23.9 +/- 8.8 ng/l; P less than 0.05), and patients with non malignant lung disease (12.7 +/- 5.5; P less than 0.05). Basal GH level was lower than 5 micrograms/l in all patients except five patients with small cell lung carcinoma and one patient with non small cell lung carcinoma., Conclusions: The higher plasma growth hormone releasing hormone levels in patients with small cell lung carcinoma compared to normal controls and patients with non small cell lung carcinoma and patients with non malignant lung disease, confirm the frequent neuroendocrine activity of this particular tumour.

Following a standard mixed meal, plasma concentrations of growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH), somatostatin (SMS) and growth hormone (GH) were measured every 30 min for 300 min in six young adults with type I insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and five normal controls. Mean blood glucose concentrations were higher and mean free insulin levels lower in the diabetics compared with controls both in fasting specimens and at all times following the mixed meal. Basal concentrations (mean +/- SEM) of GHRH were similar in diabetic (12.7 +/- 1.8 pg/ml) and control subjects (11.8 +/- 1.1 pg/ml). Following ingestion of the mixed meal, a rise in GHRH was observed in the control subjects maximal between 30 and 240 min (P less than 0.025) but the response was blunted in the diabetics. Mean GHRH concentrations were greater in the controls than in the diabetic subjects at all stages during the test, the maximum difference being noted at 120 mins (P less than 0.04). Basal SMS concentrations and those observed after the mixed meal were similar in diabetic and control subjects. These results indicate that glucose and insulin may play a role in the regulation of GHRH release following a mixed meal but circulating levels of GHRH and SMS are unlikely to be relevant to the abnormal regulation of GH in IDDM.

We have treated eight pre-pubertal children with partial GH insufficiency with continuous subcutaneous infusions of GHRH(1-29)NH2 at a dose of 60 ng/kg/min for periods of up to 1 year. In five children treated for 1 year, mean growth velocity increased from 4.6 cm/year (range 4.4-5.2) to 7.0 cm/year (5.7-8.7) (P = 0.04). Three children treated for 3-6 months showed similar height velocity increases. A return to pretreatment growth rates was seen after cessation of treatment in all children. Twenty-four-hour GH profiles performed at intervals of 3 months showed sustained augmentation of pulsatile GH secretion without evidence of desensitization. The presence of pulsatile GH secretion during continuous GHRH administration provides strong evidence in man for the role of somatostatin in determining GH pulse frequency. The ability of the pituitary to respond to a supramaximal bolus of GHRH remained constant during the treatment. Continuous administration of GHRH(1-29)NH2 will become a practicable treatment when formulated into a sustained release or depot preparation. We have shown this to be an effective therapy for some short, slowly growing children. Further studies are required to establish the optimal dosage regimen.

Using a highly specific radioimmunoassay we have measured the concentrations of human growth hormone releasing factor (ir-hGRF) in the peripheral circulation of six individuals with acquired hypothalamic hGRF deficiency. Despite their hypothalamic dysfunction venous plasma ir-hGRF increased normally in every patient after the stimulus of a mixed breakfast, from an average concentration basally of 13.6 +/- 6.0 pg/ml to a maximum of 29.0 +/- 8.4 pg/ml (mean +/- SEM) at 120 min. The findings indicate that circulating hGRF is at least in large part extrahypothalamic in origin, which in turn implies a physiological role for hGRF in the periphery.

A highly specific radioimmunoassay has been used to study changes in peripheral human plasma growth hormone releasing factor (GRF) following the ingestion of food. From a mean basal plasma concentration of 11.8 pg/ml (range less than 7-15.4 pg/ml) in six normal individuals following overnight fast, the circulating concentration of GRF-like immunoreactivity increased to a mean maximum of 36.7 pg/ml (range 20.2-77.0 pg/ml) sampled 120 min after a mixed breakfast. This increase in GRF was accompanied by suppression rather than stimulation of circulating growth hormone. The predominant source of peripheral circulating GRF-like immunoreactivity may therefore by extrahypothalamic and responds to an oral food stimulus.

The effects of subcutaneous administration of three doses of human growth hormone-releasing factor (hGRF-44 NH2 or hGRF) at doses of 100, 300 and 600 micrograms were studied in six normal young men. GH responses obtained with 100 and 300 micrograms were negligible. In contrast, the 600 micrograms dose gave a profile of response comparable in timing and magnitude to that obtained with i.v. hGRF at maximal effect doses (20, 80, 100 micrograms). Plasma immunoreactive hGRF levels (IR-hGRF) were compared after s.c. and i.v. hGRF. Mean maximal plasma concentrations were comparable with s.c. 600 micrograms and i.v. 20 micrograms. Peaks occurred earlier with i.v. hGRF (5 min as opposed to 15 min): however, return to undetectable values was obtained between 90 and 120 min after s.c. or i.v. injections. These data suggest a great loss of the peptide between the subcutaneous space and blood, without delayed absorption. High variability in plasma IR-hGRF concentrations between the subjects after the same s.c. doses was observed.

We have studied the clearance from plasma of immunoreactive growth hormone releasing hormone 1-40 (IR-GHRH) following intravenous (i.v.) and subcutaneous (s.c.) administration and the relationship between exogenous plasma IR-GHRH concentrations and GH secretion in five GH insufficient children receiving long term nocturnal pulsatile GHRH 1-40. The i.v. studies with GHRH 1-40 1 micrograms/kg demonstrated a distribution half life (t1/2) of 3.9 (SD 0.9) min and an elimination t1/2 of 53.1 (SD 3.2) min. In the s.c. studies the elimination phase was similar to the i.v. results but the transit time to the GHRH peak was slower than the i.v. distribution t1/2 9.9 (SD 3.6) min. These characteristics were maintained during successive pulses of subcutaneous GHRH. The mean IR-GHRH peaks following s.c. GHRH 1-40 administration of 1 microgram/kg and 2 micrograms/kg were 37- and 18-fold lower respectively than the mean IR-GHRH peak observed after the i.v. 1 microgram/kg bolus study. A significant correlation was shown between peak plasma IR-GHRH and serum GH concentrations during the s.c. (r = 0.75) but not the i.v. studies. Pulsatile GHRH administration has been shown to stimulate GH secretion and growth acceleration in GH insufficient children. Knowledge of the relationship between GHRH 1-40 absorption from the subcutaneous site and GH secretion is important for the development of an optimal GHRH treatment regimen in GH insufficient children.