Search

Development of inhibitors to factor VIII, a serious complication of replacement therapy in haemophilia A patients, leads to increased bleeding, morbidity and mortality. There is no data on the risk factors for inhibitor development in Indian patients with severe haemophilia A. Our aim was to study the role of immune regulatory gene polymorphisms in the development of inhibitors. Fourteen immune regulatory gene polymorphisms (IL1β, IL4, IL10, TNFA and CTLA4) were analysed in 120 patients with severe haemophilia A, i.e. 50 inhibitor positive patients, and 70 inhibitor negative control patients, by PCR-RFLP, DNA sequencing and allele-specific PCRs. The IL10 promoter 'GCC' haplotypes overall (P: 0.002, OR: 3.452, 95% CI: 1.607-7.416), and 'GCC/ATA' (P: 0.011, OR: 3.492, 95% CI: 1.402-8.696) haplotype, associated with high and intermediate IL10 production, respectively, were significantly higher in inhibitor positive patients, whereas the 'non-GCC' haplotypes overall (P: 0.002,OR: 0.290, 95% CI 0.135-0.622) and 'ATA/ATA' haplotype (P: 0.025, OR: 0.278, 95% CI: 0.096-0.802), associated with low IL10 synthesis, were significantly higher among inhibitor negative patients. The TNFA rs1799724 C/T heterozygote prevalence was significantly higher in the inhibitor positive group (P: 0.021, OR: 3.190, 95% CI: 1.273-7.990), whereas the other polymorphisms showed no statistically significant association with the presence of inhibitors. Different immune regulatory gene polymorphisms play a significant role as possible risk factors for the development of inhibitors in severe haemophilia A patients., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Several genes that modify risk of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in haemophilia A patients have been identified. Aside from the underlying mutations that cause haemophilia A, inhibitor risk appears to be modified by polymorphisms in various cytokines and immunomodulators including IL10, TNFα and CTLA4. HLA haplotypes have not been strong determinants of inhibitor risk. We sought to confirm previous observations on FVIII inhibitor risk-modifying genes and to test new candidate genes encoding various otherTH1/TH2 cytokines. We also sought to determine whether normal FVIII gene polymorphisms affect inhibitor risk in caucasians. We studied 915 caucasian, severe haemophilia A patients (282 inhibitor cases and 633 non-inhibitor controls). Genes were analysed using 368 tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms starting 20 kb 5' and ending 10 kb 3' of each gene's coding sequence; four other polymorphisms (factor V Leiden & prothrombin 20210 polymorphisms and two in HFE) were also evaluated. Haplotypes that increased inhibitor risk were found in IL10 (OR = 1.33, P = 0.04), IL12 (OR = 1.31, P = 0.04) and IL1α (OR = 2.16, P = 0.034). Protective haplotypes were seen in IL2 (OR =  .69, P = 0.008) and IL1β (OR = 0.75, P = 0.02). One rare haplotype in the FVIII gene increased the risk of inhibitor development by nearly fourfold (OR = 3.8, P = 0.004). We replicate previous findings for IL10; identify new associations with IL1, IL2 and IL12; and identify a rare FVIII haplotype in caucasians that is associated with increased inhibitor risk., (© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

The prevalence of inhibitors in Chinese haemophiliacs has not yet been reported. The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors among haemophiliacs who are treated only with plasma-derived FVIII (pdFVIII), cryoprecipitate or fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and tried to explore the relationship between the generation of inhibitors and particular FVIII deficiency genotypes. Clinical information and blood samples of 1435 patients with haemophilia A (HA) were collected by six haemophilia centres in China. The Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay was used to detect inhibitors. Multiplex PCR, long-range PCR and direct sequencing were performed for genotyping. The overall prevalence of inhibitors in Chinese HA patients was 3.9% and the prevalence of severe haemophiliacs was 4.3%; 18 of the 56 patients with inhibitors had high titres. A total of 38 different mutations were identified in the 55 patients with inhibitors, including 15 intron 22 and 3 intron 1 inversions, seven large deletions, 14 small deletion/insertions, seven nonsense mutations, one splice site mutations and eight missense mutations. Of 38 mutations, 28 were novel. Patients with large deletions and nonsense mutations were prone to have high titre inhibitors, with incidence rates of 57.1% (4/7) and 42.9% (3/7), respectively. In conclusion, the prevalence of inhibitors in Chinese HA patients is much lower than that reported for other ethnic groups and the large deletion and nonsense mutations are high risk factors for high titre inhibitor development.

One of the most severe and important complication in the treatment of patients with haemophilia A is the formation of neutralizing antibodies (FVIII inhibitors) that inhibit the clotting activity of substituted FVIII. Both genetic and environmental factors influence the susceptibility of patients to develop inhibitors. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether polymorphisms in different genes involved in the regulation of the immune system may confer susceptibility to inhibitor development in patients with HA. We analysed the distribution of polymorphisms in the CTLA4, PTPN22, IL10, TNFalpha, FOXP3 and IRF5 genes that have been reported to be associated with a number of autoimmune disease. In addition, we evaluated the distribution of IL10 haplotypes in haemophilic patients and healthy controls to assess whether specific polymorphisms in IL10 gene were associated to the risk of inhibitor development. We focused on a cohort of Italian unrelated haemophilic patients with and without a history of inhibitors. Genotyping was carried out with standard methods including RFLP, real time PCR and direct DNA sequencing. Our data show that, considering single nucleotide variations, genotype frequencies in patients with inhibitors were not significantly different from those observed in patients without inhibitors, suggesting a lack of association between these polymorphisms and the development of inhibitors. Moreover, no relationship was found between specific combinations of IL10 alleles and the antibody production. Previous contradictory association studies may depend on the different genetic background of the population examined. Further studies may contribute to a clearer understanding of this process.

The formation of antibodies against factor VIII or factor IX that inhibit replacement therapy is currently the most serious treatment-related complication faced by patients with haemophilia. This review highlights non-modifiable and modifiable risk factors that determine the development of these antibodies. The non-modifiable risk factors include patient genotype for haemophilia, immunogenotype, ethnicity and positive family history. Age, intensity of treatment and the type of clotting factor administered are identified as modifiable risk factors. These risk factors are likely to be identified more accurately in forthcoming prospective randomized controlled trials and current patient registries. Through a more complete picture of a patient's overall risk profile, individually tailored treatment schedules might be developed that could minimize the incidence of inhibitor formation and thus maximize therapeutic benefit.

Inhibitor development, because of its impact on patients' morbidity and quality of life, is presently the most serious complication of haemophilia A treatment. The identification of several genetic and non-genetic risk factors may be used for the stratification of inhibitor risk and the definition of prevention strategies, particularly for patients with a high-risk genetic profile. The most extensively studied genetic factor is the type of F8 mutation, i.e. large deletions, nonsense mutations and inversions, which are associated with a higher risk of inhibitor development. This is the basis for the increased risk in patients with inhibitor family history; however, concordance family studies showed that factors other than F8 mutations are involved. An emerging role is investigated for polymorphisms of immune-regulatory genes that may increase (IL-10 and TNF-alpha) or reduce (CTLA-4) inhibitor risk and whose heterogeneous ethnic distribution may correlate to the higher inhibitor risk in non-caucasian patients. A role for FVIII haplotypes, particularly in black haemophiliacs, has been recently proposed. Recent studies report an increased inhibitor risk for initial intensive treatments (surgery or severe bleeds requiring high-dose and/or prolonged treatment, presence of danger signals), whereas regular prophylaxis (absence of danger signals) exerts a protective effect. A clinical score including the type of F8 mutation, family history of inhibitors and intensive treatment has been recently validated for predicting inhibitor risk. Because of the lack of useful data regarding the role of different types of FVIII concentrates, the stratification of risk in patients starting replacement treatment together with the careful evaluation of indications, doses and duration of treatment at first exposures and further efforts for overcoming barriers to early implementation of prophylaxis are encouraged, particularly for patients with a predictable high inhibitor risk.

Inhibitor formation is a major complication of haemophilia treatment. In a prevalent case-control study, we evaluated blood product exposure, genotype and HLA type on haemophilia A inhibitor formation. Product exposure was extracted from medical records. Genotype was determined on stored DNA samples by detection of virtually all mutations-SSCP (DOVAM-S) and subcycling PCR. HLA typing was performed by PCR amplification and exonuclease-released fluorescence. Cases experienced higher intensity factor, 455 vs. 200 U per exposure, P < 0.005, more frequent central nervous system (CNS) bleeding, seven of 20 (35.0%) vs. one of 57 (1.7%), P = 0.001 and more commonly from inhibitor families, seven of 20 (35.0%) vs. zero of 57 (0%), P < 0.001, and African-American, 12 of 63 (19.0%) vs. six of 117 (5.1%), P = 0.015. Among the latter, CNS bleeding was more commonly the initial bleed, 60% vs. 0%, P < 0.001, and survival was shorter, 14 vs. 38 yr, P = 0.025. Inhibitor formation was uncommon in those with missense mutations, two of 65 (3.1%) vs. 31 of 119 (26.0%), P = 0.008, and unrelated to factor VIII immunogenic epitope, P = 0.388, or HLA type, P > 0.100. Genotype was not associated with race. Time to immune tolerance was shorter for titres <120 vs. > or = 120 BU/mL, six vs. 16 months, P < 0.01, but unaffected by tolerizing dose regimen, P > 0.50. Inhibitor formation is associated with high intensity product exposure, CNS bleeding, African-American race and low frequency of missense mutations. The ideal time to initiate prophylaxis to reduce CNS bleeding and inhibitor formation will require prospective studies.

BDDrFVIII is a B-domain deleted recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) product for haemophilia A. Manufacture uniquely includes purification chromatography by synthetic-affinity ligand rather than murine-based monoclonal antibody, as well as an albumin-free cell culture process. BDDrFVIII was studied in 204 patients, including 62 subjects <16 years old, in two studies. A double-blind, randomized, pharmacokinetic (PK) crossover study, utilizing a central laboratory assay (one-stage (OS)) for both drug potency assignment and plasma FVIII-activity measurements, demonstrated that BDDrFVIII was PK-equivalent to a full-length rFVIII. Favourable efficacy and safety were observed: during defined routine prophylaxis in a patient population significant for preexisting target joints, nearly half (45.7%) of patients had no bleeding, and a low-annualized bleed rate (ABR) was achieved (median 1.9); 92.5% of haemorrhages (n = 187) required < or =2 infusions. Three subjects (1.5%, across both studies) developed de novo inhibitors (low-titre, transient), and the primary safety endpoint, based on a prospective Bayesian analysis, demonstrated the absence of neoantigenicity for BDDrFVIII. The PK-equivalence, based on central testing to align test and reference articles, and the novel Bayesian analysis of inhibitor safety in these investigations reflect robust experimental designs with relevance to future studies. This extensive dataset demonstrates the safety and efficacy of BDDrFVIII for haemophilia A.

Haemophilia A (HA) is a bleeding disorder caused by mutations within the X-linked F8 gene. A series of 42 unrelated Moldovan patients with HA had their disease-causative mutation determined to provide clinically valuable genotyping information for a historically underserved population and to utilize factor VIII (FVIII) structural information to analyse the effects of haemophilic missense substitutions. DNA samples were analysed to detect intron 22 and intron 1 inversions followed by heteroduplex analysis of PCR-amplified fragments containing all exonic sequences. Missense sites identified by DNA sequencing were visualized in the recently described crystal structures of human FVIII. Of the 26 different point mutations, 12 were novel. Gel electrophoresis identified samples with a second major DNA band that migrated abnormally; these amplified products were sequenced. Thirteen intron 22 inversions and one intron 1 inversion were found. Two patients had large, partial gene deletions and there were six frameshift, two non-sense, two splicing and 16 missense genotypes. Two subjects with an intron 22 inversion and one with a large, partial gene deletion developed an alloimmune inhibitor. Their localization suggests intra- and possibly inter-molecular interactions that are important for the structural integrity and/or procoagulant function of FVIII.

Anti factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies represent the main complication of replacement therapy in severe cases of haemophilia and most patients with inhibitor have gross gene rearrangements or point mutations that hamper the production of normal circulating FVIII. In this study we have investigated 82 haemophilia A patients with inhibitors. Seventy six were severe, three were moderate and three were mild. We screened the patients for the causative mutations using long range PCR for the recurrent intron 22 inversion (invint22), multiplex PCR for intron 1 inversion (invint1) and conformation sensitive gel electrophoresis followed by DNA sequencing for all other mutation types in the F8 gene. Diverse genetic defects were detected in the severe cases (with a predominance of severe molecular defects): F8 gene inversions, large deletions and non-sense mutations account for 71% of the mutations. Only missense and splicing mutations were identified in the non-severe patients and we confirmed that the presence of inhibitors correlates well with the presence of severe mutations, but a proportion of severe patients develops inhibitors despite the presence of diverse less severe mutations. When we have analysed the subgroup of patients who underwent immunetolerance, we have found that F8 gene large deletions are likely to be a high risk factor also for immunetolerance therapy unresponsiveness, while no clear evidence has been demonstrated for other mutation types.

The formation of alloantibodies against factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX) is the most severe complication of replacement therapy in patients with haemophilia. In the last decade, genetic factors have been shown to constitute a decisive risk determinant for the development of inhibitors. In severe haemophilia A and B, mutations that result in an absent or truncated FVIII/FIX protein are associated with a 20-80% risk of inhibitor formation. In mild to moderate haemophilia, missense mutations represent the main mutation type, with an inhibitor prevalence of 5%. These patients synthesize some endogenous, although non-functional protein that is sufficient to induce immune tolerance. However, in patients with missense mutations clustered in the A2 and C2 domains (C1/C2 junction), the risk of inhibitor formation is fourfold greater than in patients with mutations outside this region, indicating that inhibitor prevalence in missense mutations is also dependent on localization of the mutation. Recently, a significant association between inhibitor formation and polymorphisms in genes coding for cytokines (IL-10) and other immunoregulatory factors (TNF-alpha) has been shown. These genetic factors constitute the individual genetic risk profile of a haemophilic patient. This risk is imprinted and fixed; however, environmental factors such as treatment schedule may increase or decrease the inhibitor risk in an individual patient. Improved understanding of these complex interactions may lead to the development of preventive measures to minimize inhibitor formation.

The presence of inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII) remains one of the most serious complications of haemophilia therapy. Accordingly, understanding risk factors that may contribute to inhibitor developments in young patients with haemophilia A continues to be an area of great interest. Previously untreated patient (PUP) population studies have been instrumental in understanding the aetiology of inhibitor development. These studies have revealed the importance of risk factors such as clotting factor exposure history, ethnicity, and FVIII genotype in the development of inhibitors, while also providing insights into potential risk factors that may be related to therapeutic practice. However, due to differences in study designs and patient populations among previous PUP studies, there are limitations to the value of these studies in deciphering the role of potential risk factors. Therefore, future PUP studies should be prospective, consistent in their study designs and consider all established parameters and also those that possibly may influence inhibitor formation, thereby facilitating a better understanding of the aetiology of inhibitor formation in haemophilia A patients.