1. Poor structural social support is associated with an increased risk of Type 2 diabetes mellitus: findings from the MONICA/KORA Augsburg cohort study.
- Author
-
Altevers J, Lukaschek K, Baumert J, Kruse J, Meisinger C, Emeny RT, and Ladwig KH
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Cohort Studies, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 epidemiology, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 psychology, Educational Status, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Germany epidemiology, Health Surveys, Humans, Incidence, Male, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Social Support, Stress, Psychological etiology, Stress, Psychological psychology, Survival Analysis, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 etiology, Social Environment, Stress, Psychological physiopathology
- Abstract
Aims: Several psychosocial factors have been shown to increase the risk of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study investigated the association between structural social support and incidence of Type 2 diabetes mellitus in men and women., Methods: Data were derived from three population-based MONICA/KORA surveys conducted in 1984-1995 in the Augsburg region (southern Germany) and followed up by 2009. The study population comprised 8952 participants (4669 men/4283 women) aged 30-74 years without diabetes at baseline. Structural social support was assessed using the Social Network Index. Sex-specific hazard ratios were estimated from Cox proportional hazard models., Results: Within follow-up, 904 incident Type 2 diabetes mellitus cases (558 men, 346 women) were observed. Crude incidence rates for Type 2 diabetes mellitus per 10 000 person-years were substantially higher in poor compared with good structural social support (men: 94 vs. 69, women: 58 vs. 43). After adjustment for age, survey, parental history of diabetes, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, BMI, education, sleep complaints and depressed mood, risk of Type 2 diabetes mellitus for participants with poor compared with good structural social support was 1.31 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.11-1.55] in men and 1.10 (95% CI = 0.88-1.37) in women. Stratified analyses revealed a hazard ratio of 1.50 (95% CI = 1.23-1.83) in men with a low level of education and 0.87 (95% CI = 0.62-1.22) in men with a high level of education (P for interaction: 0.0082)., Conclusions: Poor structural social support is associated with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in men. This association is independent of risk factors at baseline and is particularly pronounced in men with a low level of education., (© 2015 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine © 2015 Diabetes UK.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF