Search

Background: Ampicillin (AMP) is a drug that has been prescribed extensively. Reactions that have been reported include exanthema, desquamative contact eczema, urticaria and anaphylaxis. Experimental evidence indicates that the side chain of AMP is a structure that may induce a selective immune response either at the humoral or lymphocyte T-cell level. With regard to IgE reactions, the selectivity and specificity of the response needs to be studied in humans., Objectives: To study the specificity of the IgE response in a group of subjects who had an immediate allergic reaction after the administration of AMP., Methods: Subjects developing an immediate response (anaphylaxis or urticaria) after the administration of AMP or an aminopenicillin derivative with the same side chain as AMP were studied. Skin tests were made to determinants generated from benzyl penicillin (BP): benzyl penicilloyl (BPO) and minor determinant mixture (MDM), as well as amoxicillin (AX) and AMP. Specific IgE antibodies were determined to benzyl penicilloyl polylisine (BPO-PLL), amoxicilloyl-polylisine (AX-PLL) and ampicilloyl-polylisine (AMP-PLL). The specificity of the IgE antibody response was studied by RAST and RAST inhibition. Subjects were classified in three categories: group A: those who were skin test and/or RAST positive to determinants derived from benzylpenicillin, group B: those who were negative to determinants derived from benzylpenicillin but were skin test and/or RAST positive to determinants derived from AX and AMP and group C: those who were exclusively positive to determinants derived from AMP., Results: A total of 48 subjects was included in the study. In group A there were 35 cases, in group B 10 cases, and in group C three cases. RAST inhibition studies showed that in some instances the side chain of AMP could induce specific responses with a variable degree of crossreactivity between BP and AX., Conclusions: Although AMP can induce an immediate IgE response in subjects allergic to betalactams and the structure of the side chain may contribute to the specificity of the response, our results indicate that in most instances crossreactivity with the other penicillins exists and that in the groups studied selective reactions to just AMP derived determinants were uncommon.

Background: There are instances where individuals may come into contact with penicillins without being aware of it. This non-therapeutic exposure from different sources may cause sensitization and even clinical manifestations in subjects allergic to penicillins., Objective: To determine the capacity that inadvertent contact with penicillins may have in inducing resensitization and symptoms in patients diagnosed as allergic to penicillins who were followed over a long period of time after their initial evaluation., Methods: A follow-up study of penicillin-allergic subjects who agreed to be regularly tested for in vitro and in vivo control of their sensitivity. Skin tests were carried out with major and minor determinants of benzylpenicillin (BPO and MDM), amoxicillin (AX), and ampicillin (AMP), and specific IgE antibodies were determined by radioallergosorbent test (RAST). A questionnaire was sent to and answered by the subjects in order to see if they experienced symptoms at any time during the follow-up period. In addition, if any unexplained symptoms occurred, a bleeper system was used to contact the allergy centre., Results: Seven subjects experienced anaphylactic reactions with no obvious cause. At the time of their initial allergic reaction, which was caused by exposure to prescribed penicillin, the subjects had one or more positive skin tests and/or RAST results to penicillin related reagents. However, over the following 2-4 years all their tests became negative. After reporting their unexplained reaction all seven had one or more positive skin tests and/or RAST results again and when retested 1 week later RAST measurements showed that levels of penicillin-specific IgE were maintained or increased. None of the subjects had knowingly received penicillin but the questionnaire showed that six had been exposed to it and in the seventh case exposure was likely. In two cases contact was by sexual intercourse with a partner who was receiving penicillin, three subjects had handled penicillin formulations and one had drunk from a glass previously used for giving penicillin. In the seventh case exposure could have occurred whilst in hospital for surgery, although this was not proven., Conclusions: these results show that non-therapeutic exposure to penicillin can cause severe symptoms and that in vitro and in vivo testing can help in the diagnosis of such cases.