Search

Abstract Background Glaucoma is a leading cause of visual disability and blindness. Release of iris pigment within the eye, pigment dispersion syndrome (PDS), can lead to one type of glaucoma known as pigmentary glaucoma. PDS has a genetic component, however, the genes involved with this condition are largely unknown. We sought to discover genes that cause PDS by testing cohorts of patients and controls for mutations using a tiered analysis of exome data. Results Our primary analysis evaluated melanosome-related genes that cause dispersion of iris pigment in mice (TYRP1, GPNMB, LYST, DCT, and MITF). We identified rare mutations, but they were not statistically enriched in PDS patients. Our secondary analyses examined PMEL (previously linked with PDS), MRAP, and 19 other genes. Four MRAP mutations were identified in PDS cases but not in controls (p = 0.016). Immunohistochemical analysis of human donor eyes revealed abundant MRAP protein in the iris, the source of pigment in PDS. However, analysis of MRAP in additional cohorts (415 cases and 1645 controls) did not support an association with PDS. We also did not confirm a link between PMEL and PDS in our cohorts due to lack of reported mutations and similar frequency of the variants in PDS patients as in control subjects. Conclusions We did not detect a statistical enrichment of mutations in melanosome-related genes in human PDS patients and we found conflicting data about the likely pathogenicity of MRAP mutations. PDS may have a complex genetic basis that is not easily unraveled with exome analyses.

Abstract Background Nanophthalmos has a significant genetic background and disease-causing mutations have been recently been reported in the myelin regulatory factor (MYRF) gene. We report clinical features in a patient with nanophthalmos and a Thr518Met MYRF mutation. Case presentation A three-year-old male was discovered to have nanophthalmos after first presenting to the emergency department for a frontal headache, eye pain, emesis, and lethargy. Imaging studies (CT and MRI) were negative except for increased posterior fossa cerebrospinal fluid. Subsequent examinations revealed nanophthalmos (short axial eye lengths 18.1 mm OD and 18.3 mm OS), microcornea, and a large crystalline lens. Peripheral chorioretinal pigment abnormalities were also observed. He experienced episodes of marked ocular hypertension (53 mmHg OD and 60 mmHg) likely due to intermittent angle closure precipitated by nanophthalmos. The ocular hypertension was responsive to topical medicines. Genetic analysis of known nanophthalmos genes MFRP and TMEM98 were negative, while a novel mutation, Thr518Met was detected in MYRF. The Thr518Met mutation was absent from 362 matched normal controls and was extremely rare in a large population database, allele frequency of 0.000024. The Thr518Met mutation altered a highly conserved amino acid in the MYRF protein and three of four algorithms suggested that this mutation is likely pathogenic. Finally, molecular modeling showed that the Thr518Met mutation is damaging to MYRF structure. Together these data suggest that the Thr518Met mutation causes nanophthalmos. Conclusions Nanophthalmos may present at an early age with features of angle closure glaucoma and a Thr518Met mutation in MYRF was detected in a patient with nanophthalmos. Prevalence data, homology data, mutation analysis data, and protein modeling data suggest that this variant is pathogenic and may expand the phenotypic range of syndromic nanophthalmos caused by MYRF mutations to include central nervous system abnormalities (increased posterior fossa cerebrospinal fluid).