Search

Abstract Background Myocarditis refers to the inflammation of the myocardium caused by infection or autoimmune disease that may or may not present with clinical manifestations, such as gastrointestinal symptoms, dyspnea, chest pain, or sudden death. Although myocarditis and coronary artery vasospasm may mimic ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with normal coronary arteries on angiography, acute myocarditis rarely causes coronary artery spasm. Here, we report a case of coronary artery spasm with reversible electrocardiographic changes mimicking STEMI in an adolescent with acute myocarditis. Case presentation A 15-year-old boy present with sudden-onset repeated chest pain following a 3-day history of flu-like illness. Cardiac biomarkers were significantly elevated. Electrocardiography showed ST-segment elevation in the absence of detectable vasospasm on coronary angiography. These findings were consistent with the diagnosis of coronary artery spasm secondary to acute myocarditis. Treatment with immunoglobulin for 2 days improved his condition. The patient was discharged on the 12th day with complete resolution of symptoms and normalization of electrocardiogram findings. Conclusions We reported a case of coronary artery spasm due to acute myocarditis. This study highlights the importance of considering coronary artery spasm due to acute myocarditis as a differential diagnosis in patients presenting with signs of STEMI as these diseases have different medical management strategies.

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to determine if there was a difference between coronary reimplantation after neoaortic reconstruction and open coronary reimplantation technique in arterial switch operation (ASO). Methods A total of 236 patients who underwent ASO from March 1994 to August 2018 were enrolled in this study. Multivariate analysis was performed for postoperative early mortality. Patients were divided into the open coronary reimplantation and coronary reimplantation after neoaortic reconstruction groups. The 30-day mortality, intraoperative and postoperative coronary artery (CA) revisions, CA–related late morbidity and mortality, and early and late neoaortic valve regurgitations after ASO were compared between the two groups. Results Overall postoperative early mortality was 7.2% (17/236). Patients who underwent open coronary reimplantation had higher early mortality as compared with those who underwent coronary reimplantation after neoaortic reconstruction. Risk factors for postoperative early mortality from multivariate analysis were cardiopulmonary bypass time and open coronary reimplantation. There was a higher incidence of CA–related late mortality or morbidity in the open coronary reimplantation group. The open coronary reimplantation group had a higher incidence of intraoperative or postoperative CA revision. There were no differences in the incidence of mild or more neoaortic valve regurgitation at discharge or in the 5-year freedom from mild or more neoaortic valve regurgitation. Conclusions CA reimplantation after neoaortic reconstruction yields better results in mortality and intraoperative or postoperative CA–related problems in ASO without increasing postoperative neoaortic valve regurgitation.