Search

Abstract Background The majority of maternal deaths occur in low-income countries, and facility-based childbirth is recognised as a strategy to reduce maternal mortality. However, experiences of disrespect and abuse during childbirth are reported as deterrents to women’s utilisation of health care facilities. Health care providers play a critical role in women’s experiences during childbirth; yet, there is limited research on service providers’ views of disrespect and abuse in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aimed to explore providers’ perspectives on disrespect and abuse during childbirth in a teaching hospital in Southwest Ethiopia. Method Qualitative study was conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital in Jimma Ethiopia. In-depth interviews were conducted with 32 purposefully selected health care providers, including midwives, obstetrics and genecology resident’s, senior obstetricians and nurses. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed using the qualitative data analysis software program MAXQDA. Results Three major themes were identified from the health care providers’ perspectives: (1) respectful and abuse-free care, (2) recognised disrespect and abuse; and (3) drivers of women’s feelings of disrespect and abuse. The first theme indicates that most of the participants perceived that women were treated with respect and had not experienced abuse during childbirth. The second theme showed that a minority of the participants recognised that women experienced disrespect and abuse during childbirth. The third theme covered situations in which providers thought that drivers for women felt disrespected. Conclusion Most providers perceived women’s experiences as respectful, and they normalized, and rationalized disrespect and abuse. The effect of teaching environment, the scarcity of resources has been reported as a driver for disrespect and abuse. To ensure respectful maternity care, a collaborative effort of administrators, teaching institutions, professional associations and researchers is needed. Such collaboration is essential to create a respectful teaching environment, ensure availability of resources, sustained in-service training for providers, and establishing an accountability mechanism for respectful maternity care.

Abstract Background Mental disorders in the perinatal period (PMD) can severely harm women and their children if not detected early and treated appropriately. Even though mental health care is covered by health insurance and is used widely by women in the perinatal period in Switzerland, it is not known if the care provided is meeting the needs of the patients and is efficient in the view of health care professionals. The aim of this study is to identify strengths, gaps and requirements for adequate mental health care in the perinatal period from the perspectives of patients and care providers for a wide range of relevant mental disorders. Methods In the qualitative study we conduct (1) semi-structured single interviews with former PMD patients to obtain narratives about their experiences and needs for health care for their condition. Women are included who have been treated for PMD but are mentally stable at the time of the interview (n = 24). We will stratify the sample by 4 clusters of relevant ICD-10 F-diagnoses, covering the most frequent and the most severe mental disorders. We will further stratify the sample based on whether the women already had experience with psychiatric or psychological health care or not before their last episode of PMD. We will also conduct (2) three interprofessional focus groups with health and social care professionals involved in perinatal care, and a health insurance representative. The focus groups will consist of 5–8 professionals. Data collection and thematic analysis will consider Levesque’s et al. (2013) conceptual model on access to health care. Discussion The study will provide fundamental data on the experiences and perspectives about perinatal mental health care from user and provider perspectives. The study will generate the evidence base needed to develop models of integrated, coordinated, patient- and family-centred care that is accessed by women with various types of PMD. Trial registration The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov in November 2019 under the identifier NCT04185896.

Abstract Background Globally, there has been increasing attention to women’s experiences of care and calls for a person-centered care approach. At the heart of this approach is the patient-provider relationship. It is necessary to examine the extent to which providers and women agree on the care that is provided and received. Studies have found that incongruence between women’s and providers’ perceptions may negatively impact women’s compliance, satisfaction, and future use of health facilities. However, there are no studies that examine patient and provider perspectives on person-centered care. Methods To fill this gap in the literature, we use cross-sectional data of 531 women and 33 providers in seven government health facilities in Kenya to assess concordance and discordance in person-centered care measures. Additionally, we analyze 41 in-depth interviews with providers from three of these facilities to examine why differences in reporting may occur. Descriptive statistical methods were used to measure the magnitude of differences between reports of women and reports of providers. Thematic analyses were conducted for provider surveys. Results Our findings suggest high discordance between women and providers’ perspectives in regard to person-centered care experiences. On average, women reported lower levels of person-centered care compared to providers, including low respectful and dignified care, communication and autonomy, and supportive care. Providers were more likely to report higher rates of poor health facility environment such as having sufficient staff. We summarize the overarching reasons for the divergence in women and provider reports as: 1) different understanding or interpretation of person-centered care behaviors, and 2) different expectations, norms or values of provider behaviors. Providers rationalized abuse towards women, did not allow a companion of choice, and blamed women for poor patient-provider communication. Women lacked assurance in privacy and confidentiality, and faced challenges related to the health facility environment. Providers attributed poor person-centered care to both individual and facility/systemic factors. Conclusions Implications of this study suggests that providers should be trained on person-centered care approaches and women should be counseled on understanding patient rights and how to communicate with health professionals.