Search

Abstract The prevalence of children with medical complexity is increasing, therefore drug formulations must be updated in accordance with their needs. Furthermore, a different drug formulation may be also needed for patients who require a very low dosage which is not easily reachable with those of the industrial products or for those following a ketogenic diet. Galenic (or compounded) drugs have been recently pointed out as effective in treating children. Nonetheless, their knowledge among healthcare providers is limited. We investigated how much did pediatricians know about galenic compounds by a short questionnaire administered to family and hospital pediatricians and pediatric residents in Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy. We collected answers from 65 family pediatricians (57,5%), 39 hospital pediatricians (36,1%), and 47 pediatric residents (41,2%). Overall, both family and hospital pediatricians substantially know what is a galenic compound and the indications to its use. Of note, most of pediatricians ignore which is the legislation that allows the galenic compounds’ preparation and use, and which is the correct procedure to prescribe them. Moreover, half of the hospital pediatricians and one-third of the family ones erroneously stated that galenic formulations cost more or like the industrial products, and around the 15% of both categories affirmed that galenic compounds are less safe than the commercial product. In conclusion, the use of galenic drug may significantly improve children’s and caregivers’ quality of life. We believe that all pediatricians should be updated on this quite new and interesting topic.

Abstract Background Italy was the first European country to experience a massive outbreak of Sars-coV-2 in March 2020. Severe measures were introduced to face the pandemic, significantly impacting all healthcare services, including pediatric palliative care (PPC) networks. We investigated how the Covid-19 pandemic modified the provision of PPC services in Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy. Both the acute and long-term impacts on the families were addressed. Methods We administered a retrospective three-sections online questionnaire to the eligible families assisted by our regional PPC network. Inclusion criteria were: child needing specialistic PPC, adequate knowledge of the Italian language, being in charge of the PPC regional network of Friuli Venezia Giulia from February 1, 2020. The three sections examined the same issues in different periods: the pre-covid period (until February 29, 2020), the lockdown period (March 1, 2020, to April 30, 2020), and the post-lockdown period (May 2021). Results Twelve patients were included. During the lockdown period, 54.6% of children had to stop physiotherapy sessions, while, among those who continued, 80.0% experienced a reduction in the sessions’ frequency. In the post-lockdown period, 45.5% of children did not have physiotherapy as often as before the pandemic onset. Overall, the access to medical visits during the lockdown and after its end was significantly reduced (p = 0.01). The level of support perceived by the families descended from grade 3 (intermediate) in the pre-covid period to 2 (low) during the lockdown (p