Search

Abstract Background Left atrial (LA) conduction velocity (CV) is an electrical remodeling parameter of atrial fibrillation (AF) substrate. However, the pathophysiological substrate of LA-CV and its impact on outcomes after catheter ablation for AF have not been well evaluated. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 119 patients with AF who underwent catheter ablation and electroanatomical mapping during sinus rhythm. To measure regional LA-CV, we took triplet sites (A, B, and C) on the activation map and calculated the magnitude of the matched orthogonal projection vector between vector-AB and vector-AC, indicating two-dimensional CV. The median of the LA-CVs from four triad sites in both the anterior and posterior walls was set as the ‘model LA-CV’. We evaluated the impact of the model LA-CV on recurrence after ablation and relationship between the model LA-CV and LA-low voltage area (LVA) of

Abstract Background The efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is not guaranteed for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF), and it is unclear which type of ablation approach should be applied in addition to PVI. This study aimed to compare outcomes and prognosis between empirical linear ablation and low-voltage area (LVA) ablation after PVI for PeAF. Methods We enrolled 128 patients with PeAF who were assigned to the linear ablation group (n = 64) and the LVA ablation group (n = 64) using a propensity score-matched model. After PVI and cardioversion, the patients underwent either empirical linear ablation or LVA ablation during sinus rhythm. All patients in the linear ablation group underwent both roof line and mitral valve isthmus (MVI) ablations. An electrical-guided ablation targeting LVA (