Search

Background:Longitudinal studies about the change from non-radiographic axial Spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) to r-axSpA (radiographic axial Spondyloarthritis) are scarce but show a 9-10% progression rate over 2 years (1-2) and a 24% progression rate over 10 years in another study (3). However, in early cohorts such as DESIR, this only represents a 5% over 5 years (4).Objectives:The aim of this study was to know the rate of progression from nr-axSpA to r-axSpA over 6 years in the early Esperanza cohort.Methods:This study included 94 patients of the Spanish early spondyloarthritis (SpA) Esperanza cohort, 60 fulfilled the ASAS classification criteria for SpA. Every patient had a baseline and a six years sacroiliac X-ray. Nine readers, blinded for the diagnosis, participated in the reliability exercise, all of them experienced rheumatologists and members of the Spanish spondyloarthritis working group (GRESSER). Patients with SpA were classified as having r-axSpA, at baseline or after 6 years of follow-up, if they fulfilled the radiographic item of the modified New York criteria (mNY) (presence of radiographic changes in the sacroiliac joints -SIJ- of at least grade II bilaterally or grade III or IV unilaterally). The gold standard of SIJ X-Ray was the categorical opinion of at least five of the expert readers. For the statistical analysis, the Chi-square and Kappa tests were performed.Results:Demographic data of the SpA patients were: mean age 33.4±7.5 years; 37 (61.7%) male; mean CRP 6.4±6.5 mg/dl and ESR 10.3±10.6. Present smokers 30.6%; and past smokers 16.3%. HLA-B27 (+) 56.7%. Regarding the presence of X-Ray sacroilitis: 20 patients had baseline sacroilitis and 18 at the final visit; 11 had sacroiliitis at both baseline and final visits; 9 patients changed from baseline sacroiliitis to no-sacroiliitis and 7 changed from baseline no-sacroiliitis to sacroiliitis at the 6 year visit. The reliability of the readers was fair with a mean inter-reader kappa test of 0.375 (range 0.146 - 0.652) and a mean agreement of 73.7% (range 58.7% - 90%).Conclusion:In this group of patients with early SpA no progression from nr-axSpA to r-axSpA over 6 years was observed. It appears that early diagnosis and standard treatment seem to reduce SIJ radiographic progression.References:[1]Poddubnyy D, Rudwaleit M, Haibel H, et al. Rates and predictors of radiographic sacroiliitis progression over 2 years in patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:1369–74.[2]Sampaio-Barros PD, Conde RA, Donadi EA, et al. Undifferentiated spondyloarthropathies in Brazilians: importance of HLA-B27 and the B7-CREG alleles in characterization and disease progression. J Rheumatol 2003;30:2632–7.[3]Sampaio-Barros PD, Bortoluzzo AB, Conde RA, et al. Undifferentiated spondyloarthritis: a longterm followup. J Rheumatol 2010;37:1195–9.[4]Dougados M, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1823–1828.Disclosure of Interests:Carolina Tornero: None declared, María del Carmen Castro Villegas: None declared, Xavier Juanola-Roura: None declared, Maria Luz García-Vivar: None declared, Cristina Fernández-Carballido Consultant of: Yes, I have received fees for scientific advice (Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly and Novartis), Speakers bureau: Yes, I have received fees as a speaker (Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis), Jose Francisco Garcia LLorente: None declared, Beatriz Joven-Ibáñez Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, E. Galindez: None declared, Claudia Urrego-Laurín: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel Grant/research support from: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Consultant of: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Paid instructor for: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Speakers bureau: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi)

Background:There are few studies focused on the development of structural damage over time in patients with early SpAObjectives:The aim of this study is to analyze the mSASSS radiographic progression of spine in patients with early spondyloarthritis (SpA) in the Esperanza cohort.Methods:In this longitudinal study, 49 patients of the Spanish early spondyloarthritis (SpA) Esperanza cohort were included. Every patient had a baseline and a six years lateral X-Ray of the cervical and lumbar of spine. The assessment of spine structural damage was done by the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). Nine readers, blinded for the diagnosis, participated in the reliability exercise, all of them experienced rheumatologists and members of the Spanish spondyloarthritis working group (GRESSER). The mSASSS progression and development of new syndesmophytes was analyzed. The gold standard of every elemental lesion of the mSASSS and the total mSASSS score was the agreement achieved by the independent categorical opinion of at least five of the nine readers. For reliability, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) two-way mixed, absolute agreement was used.Results:Forty-nine patients were included, 69 % were males and 49%, HLA B27 positive. Mean ± SD baseline ESR, CRP, BASDAI, BASFI and mSASSS were 10.7±11.7, 5.4±7.1, 3.7±2.5, 2.1±2.0 and 0.326±0.85, respectively. Inter-reader ICC reliability of the 9 readers was 0.812 (CI 95%; 0.764-0.857). The mSASSS score at the six-year visit was 0.67 ± 1.6: thirty-nine patients did not present any changes in this score at the end of the follow-up, two patients had Δ mSASSS of – 1 and eight patients, an increase in this score (four patients, +1; three patients, +2 and one patient, +9 points).At baseline, five patients presented one syndesmophyte; at the six-year visit, seven had one syndesmophyte; one patient, two syndesmophytes and another one, one bone bridge. Only 2/5 patients (40%) with syndesmophytes at baseline showed an increase in Δ mSASSS; the two patients with a Δ mSASSS of -1 did not have syndesmophytes at baseline. Five out of eight patients (62.5%) with an increase of the Δ mSASSS presented this lesion at the six-year visit but only two of them showed syndesmophytes at baseline. On the other hand, two of the three patients who showed an increase of the ΔmSASSS without syndesmophytes at baseline presented an erosion in the anterior vertebral corner and the patient with the bone bridge had a previous syndesmophyte. Our results indicate that in early SpA much of the progression appears in patients without previous syndesmophytes.Conclusion:Spinal radiographic progression was very low in our early SpA cohort, with a mean progression of 0.3 mSASSS units. Only eight patients (16.3%) presented spinal structural progression, most of them not showing syndesmophytes at baseline. It is reasonable to consider that an early diagnosis and monitoring could result in a low radiographic progression.Disclosure of Interests:Eugenio de Miguel Grant/research support from: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Consultant of: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Paid instructor for: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Speakers bureau: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Jose Francisco Garcia LLorente: None declared, Claudia Urrego-Laurín: None declared, Maria Luz García-Vivar: None declared, Cristina Fernández-Carballido Consultant of: Yes, I have received fees for scientific advice (Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly and Novartis), Speakers bureau: Yes, I have received fees as a speaker (Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis), María del Carmen Castro Villegas: None declared, Beatriz Joven-Ibáñez Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Xavier Juanola-Roura: None declared, Carolina Tornero: None declared, E. Galindez: None declared

Background Low back pain of mechanical origin is a major cause of disability and surgical intervention. The lumbar computed tomography (CT)-guided steroid infiltration can accelerate the recovery process and sometimes avoid the surgery. Objectives Our aim was to review the indications, efficacy and complications of this technique in a wide series of unselected patients. In addition a comparative study of efficacy was performed according to the lumbar underlying pathology, type of steroid and approach of injection. Methods Study of lumbar CT-guided steroid injections performed in a University Hospital between January 2012 and June 2015. The minimum follow-up was 3 months. The procedure was performed in patients with low back pain refractory to standard medical therapy and Lumbar Spine Rehabilitation. Efficacy was assessed at 1 and 3 months according to a semiquantitative scale as the pain response as a) total response, b) partially c) no or d) worsening pain. A comparative study of the efficacy and safety was performed, regarding: a) underlying pathology, b) approach of injection and c) the different types of steroids used. Fisher9s test and χ 2 and the SAS System for Windows V program 9.2.were used for statistical analysis. Results During the study period 258 procedures were performed in 171 patients (132 men/126 women) with a mean age ± SD of 58.24±13.45 years (range, 18–88). The indications for the injection were: a) disc herniation (44.57%), b) lumbar stenosis (34.11%), c) postoperative fibrosis and spondylolisthesis (20.15%) and d) facet joint synovial cysts syndrome (1.17%). Approaches used were: a) posterior epidural (24.42%), b) lateral recess (58.91%), and c) foraminal (16.67%). The chosen steroid was triamcinolone (74.81%), dexamethasone (23.64%) and methylprednisolone (1.55%). In a significant proportion of the procedures improvement in the patient9s sintomatology was reported at the first month, regardless of the indication, route of corticosteroid injection and steroid used (TABLE). Regarding the overall outcome, at 3 months 72.48% of the patients experienced clinical improvement. And only 21.71% of patients required a subsequent surgery. The clinical efficacy showed no statistically significant differences according to the indication of the procedure or the route used for the injection. However, the improvement of pain was significantly greater in patients treated with triamcinolone than those treated with dexamethasone (p=0.01). Regarding safety there were 6 (2.3%) local complications (puncture of the thecal sac) and 3 (1.16%) systemic complications (allergic reaction). None of these complicationes were of clinical relevance and they were not associated with the corticosteroid used. Conclusions CT-guided corticosteroid injection is an effective and safe treatment in low back pain refractory to standard medical therapy in patients with spinal stenosis, disc herniation and postoperative fibrosis. Triamcinolone infiltration seems to be more effective than dexamethasone. Disclosure of Interest None declared