1. Visual function after ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty or Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with cataract surgery: a randomised controlled clinical trial.
- Author
-
Madsen MBM, Ivarsen A, and Hjortdal J
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Single-Blind Method, Middle Aged, Endothelium, Corneal pathology, Cell Count, Cataract physiopathology, Cataract complications, Aged, 80 and over, Follow-Up Studies, Treatment Outcome, Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty methods, Visual Acuity physiology, Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy surgery, Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy physiopathology, Contrast Sensitivity physiology, Phacoemulsification, Lens Implantation, Intraocular methods
- Abstract
Aims: To compare best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity and endothelial cell density (ECD) after ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) and Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK)., Methods: A randomised, single-blinded, single-centre design was used. 72 patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy and cataract were randomised to UT-DSAEK or DMEK combined with phacoemulsification and lens implantation. 27 patients with cataract were included in a control group and treated with phacoemulsification and lens implantation. The primary outcome was BCVA at 12 months., Results: Compared with UT-DSAEK, DMEK resulted in better BCVA with mean differences of 6.1 early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) (p=0.001) after 3 months, 7.4 ETDRS (p<0.001) after 6 months and 5.7 ETDRS (p<0.001) after 12 months. The control group obtained significantly better BCVA with a mean difference of 5.2 ETDRS (p<0.001) compared with DMEK 12 months postoperatively. Compared with UT-DSAEK, contrast sensitivity was significantly better 3 months after DMEK with a mean difference of 0.10 LogCS (p=0.03). However, our study found no effect after 12 months (p=0.08). ECD was significantly lower after UT-DSAEK compared with DMEK with mean differences of 332 cells/mm
2 (p<0.01) after 3 months, 296 cells/mm2 (p<0.01) after 6 months and 227 cells/mm2 (p=0.03) after 12 months., Conclusions: Compared with UT-DSAEK, DMEK resulted in better BCVA 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Twelve months postoperatively, DMEK had a higher ECD than UT-DSAEK; however, no difference in contrast sensitivity was found., Trial Registration Number: NCT04417959., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF