Search

The objectives of this study were to characterize the well-defined endometrial cancer (EC) type I (endometrioid [EEC] G1-G2) versus the prototype of EC type II (serous [ESC]) and to evaluate the expression of specific biomarkers differentially expressed between 2 well-defined types, in those EC subtypes (such as EEC G3) disputed between types I and II.Data from 25 patients (10 EEC G1-G2, 8 EEC G3, 5 ESC, and 2 clear cell) submitted to the surgical treatment were collected. Two-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry (MS) analysis were performed on 5 EEC G1-G2 and 5 healthy endometrial samples of the same patients. Differentially expressed proteins, such as DJ-1, were validated by Western blot. In patients with EEC G1-G2, serum levels of DJ-1, an overexpressed oncoprotein related to EC pathogenesis and progression, were evaluated and then compared with levels identified in patients with ESC and healthy controls. The DJ-1 immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed on neoplastic and healthy endometrium collected from the same patients. The 8 stored samples of EEC G3 were submitted to DJ-1 IHC assays.The 2-dimensional electrophoresis analysis identified 1040 protein spots differentially expressed in EEC G1-G2 compared with healthy endometrium. Forty-two spots were subjected to liquid chromatography-MS/MS analysis. Thirty-three up-regulated (like an annexin 2 [ANXA2] shorter isoform, CAPG [macrophage-capping protein], DJ-1/PARK7) and 9 down-regulated (like calreticulin and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L1) proteins were identified and validated by Western blot. A significant increase in serum DJ-1 levels of EEC G1-G2 versus the healthy controls and in ESC versus EEC patients was observed. DJ-1 IHC score was significantly higher in ESC versus those EEC G1-G2. In 3 cases of EEC G3, the DJ-1 expression was similar to the ESC subtype.The identification of proteins, such as DJ-1, differentially expressed, between well-defined EC types I and II allows to make a subtype-specific presurgical diagnosis and help surgeon to safely preoperatively choose a proper surgical treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aggressive surgical strategy adopted for vulvar cancer is related to a high complication rate, usually consisting in infections and wound breakdown. Considering that platelet gel concentrate improves reparation of cutaneous lesions, the aim of the current retrospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of platelet gel application in women who had undergone radical surgery for vulvar cancer.We retrospectively analyzed record charts of 25 women referred to our academic departments with a diagnosis of vulvar cancer and who had undergone radical vulvectomy plus inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy between January 2007 and December 2011. During the reconstructive phase, a platelet gel was placed on the vaginal breach in 10 women (group A). In the remaining 15 patients, only surgical strategies were performed (group B). Primary outcomes were wound infection, necrosis, and/or breakdown of wounds rates; secondary outcomes were postoperative fever, hospital stay, and lastly, wound healing.Compared to surgery alone, the platelet gel application was related to a significant decrease in wound infection (P = 0.032), necrosis of vaginal wounds (P = 0.096), and breakdown wound (P = 0.048) rates. In addition, in group A, reduction in postoperative fever rate (P < 0.001) and hospital stay (P < 0.001) were also detected. Compared to surgery alone, a faster wound healing in patients who had undergone surgery plus platelet (P < 0.001) were lastly observed.In conclusion, platelet gel application before vulvar reconstruction represents an effective strategy to prevent wound breakdown after local advanced vulvar cancer surgery. However, further prospective data are needed to confirm these preliminary results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]