1. Epidemiological impact of prioritising SARS-CoV-2 vaccination by antibody status: Mathematical modelling analyses
- Author
-
Hadi M. Yassine, Gheyath K. Nasrallah, Andrew Jeremijenko, Hanan F. Abdul Rahim, Mohamed H. Al-Thani, Roberto Bertollini, Zaina Al Kanaani, Ali Nizar Latif, Monia Makhoul, Hiam Chemaitelly, Laith J. Abu-Raddad, Peter Coyle, Houssein H. Ayoub, Abdullatif Al Khal, Einas Al Kuwari, Riyazuddin Mohammad Shaik, Mohamed Ghaith Al Kuwari, Anvar Hassan Kaleeckal, Hamad Eid Al Romaihi, and Adeel A. Butt
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Population ,communicable diseases ,Disease ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Environmental health ,Epidemiology ,medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,education ,education.field_of_study ,biology ,Transmission (medicine) ,business.industry ,Public health ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,public health ,Health Technology Assessment ,COVID-19 ,General Medicine ,vaccination ,Vaccination ,030104 developmental biology ,biology.protein ,Antibody ,business - Abstract
Background Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have been developed, but their availability falls far short of global needs. This study aimed to investigate the impact of prioritising available doses on the basis of recipient antibody status, that is by exposure status, using Qatar as an example. Methods Vaccination impact (defined as the reduction in infection incidence and the number of vaccinations needed to avert one infection or one adverse disease outcome) was assessed under different scale-up scenarios using a deterministic meta-population mathematical model describing SARS-CoV-2 transmission and disease progression in the presence of vaccination. Results For a vaccine that protects against infection with an efficacy of 95%, half as many vaccinations were needed to avert one infection, disease outcome or death by prioritising antibody-negative individuals for vaccination. Prioritisation by antibody status reduced incidence at a faster rate and led to faster elimination of infection and return to normalcy. Further prioritisation by age group amplified the gains of prioritisation by antibody status. Gains from prioritisation by antibody status were largest in settings where the proportion of the population already infected at the commencement of vaccination was 30%-60%. For a vaccine that only protects against disease and not infection, vaccine impact was reduced by half, whether this impact was measured in terms of averted infections or disease outcomes, but the relative gains from using antibody status to prioritise vaccination recipients were similar. Conclusions Major health and economic gains can be achieved more quickly by prioritizing those who are antibody-negative while doses of the vaccine remain in short supply. This study received support from the Biomedical Research Program, and the Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Biomathematics Research Core, all at Weill Cornell MedicineQatar, as well as support provided by the Ministry of Public Health and Hamad Medical Corporation. The developed mathematical models were made possible by NPRP grant number 9-040-3-008 (principal investigator: LJA-R) and NPRP grant number 12S-0216-190094 (principal investigator: LJA-R) from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation; https://www.qnrf.org).
- Published
- 2021