4 results on '"Weilan Xu"'
Search Results
2. Household preparedness for emergency events: a cross-sectional survey on residents in four regions of China
- Author
-
Chaojie Liu, Wei Xu, Chao Yi Chen, Yajun Dai, Weilan Xu, Qunhong Wu, Yanhua Hao, and Ning Ning
- Subjects
Medicine - Abstract
Objective This study aimed to assess household preparedness for emergency events and its determinants in China.Design A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted on 3541 households in China in 2015.Participants Households were selected using a stratified cluster sampling strategy, representing central, eastern, western and southern regions of China. The designed questionnaires were administered through face-to-face interviews.Outcome measures Household emergency preparedness was measured with 14 indicators, tapping into the supply of nine emergency necessities (food and water, extra batteries, battery-powered radio, battery-operated torch, first-aid kit, gas mask, fire extinguisher, escape ropes, whistle), coverage of accident insurance, knowledge of local emergency response systems (emergency numbers, exit routes and shelters) and availability of a household evacuation plan. If an individual acted on 9 of the 14 indicators, they were deemed well prepared. Logistic regression models were established to identify predictors of well preparedness based on 3541 returned questionnaires containing no missing values.Results Only 9.9% of households were well prepared for emergencies: 53.6% did not know what to do and 31.6% did not want to think about it. A higher level of preparedness was found in the respondents who have attained higher education (adjusted OR=0.826 compared with the higher level), participated in emergency training activities (adjusted OR=2.299), had better emergency knowledge (adjusted OR=2.043), reported less fate-submissiveness (adjusted OR=1.385) and more self-reliance (adjusted OR=1.349), prior exposure to emergency events (adjusted OR=1.280) and held more positive attitudes towards preparedness (adjusted OR=1.286).Conclusion Household preparedness for emergency events is poor in China. Lack of motivation, negative attitude to preparedness and knowledge shortfall are major but remediable barriers for household preparedness.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Household preparedness for emergency events: a cross-sectional survey on residents in four regions of China
- Author
-
Lijun Gao, Yajun Dai, Zheng Kang, Qunhong Wu, Chao Yi Chen, Ning Ning, Chaojie Liu, Wei Xu, Weilan Xu, and Yanhua Hao
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,China ,Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ,Fire extinguisher ,Higher education ,Adolescent ,Cross-sectional study ,0211 other engineering and technologies ,emergency preparedness ,Disaster Planning ,02 engineering and technology ,Logistic regression ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,Young Adult ,0302 clinical medicine ,law ,Environmental health ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,disaster preparedness ,Original Research ,Aged ,021110 strategic, defence & security studies ,Family Characteristics ,Emergency management ,business.industry ,Questionnaire ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Logistic Models ,Preparedness ,Cluster sampling ,Female ,Public Health ,Emergencies ,business ,household preparedness - Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to assess household preparedness for emergency events and its determinants in China.DesignA cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted on 3541 households in China in 2015.ParticipantsHouseholds were selected using a stratified cluster sampling strategy, representing central, eastern, western and southern regions of China. The designed questionnaires were administered through face-to-face interviews.Outcome measuresHousehold emergency preparedness was measured with 14 indicators, tapping into the supply of nine emergency necessities (food and water, extra batteries, battery-powered radio, battery-operated torch, first-aid kit, gas mask, fire extinguisher, escape ropes, whistle), coverage of accident insurance, knowledge of local emergency response systems (emergency numbers, exit routes and shelters) and availability of a household evacuation plan. If an individual acted on 9 of the 14 indicators, they were deemed well prepared. Logistic regression models were established to identify predictors of well preparedness based on 3541 returned questionnaires containing no missing values.ResultsOnly 9.9% of households were well prepared for emergencies: 53.6% did not know what to do and 31.6% did not want to think about it. A higher level of preparedness was found in the respondents who have attained higher education (adjusted OR=0.826 compared with the higher level), participated in emergency training activities (adjusted OR=2.299), had better emergency knowledge (adjusted OR=2.043), reported less fate-submissiveness (adjusted OR=1.385) and more self-reliance (adjusted OR=1.349), prior exposure to emergency events (adjusted OR=1.280) and held more positive attitudes towards preparedness (adjusted OR=1.286).ConclusionHousehold preparedness for emergency events is poor in China. Lack of motivation, negative attitude to preparedness and knowledge shortfall are major but remediable barriers for household preparedness.
- Published
- 2019
4. Household preparedness for emergency events: a cross-sectional survey on residents in four regions of China.
- Author
-
Chao Yi Chen, Wei Xu, Yajun Dai, Weilan Xu, Chaojie Liu, Qunhong Wu, Lijun Gao, Zheng Kang, Yanhua Hao, and Ning Ning
- Abstract
Objective This study aimed to assess household preparedness for emergency events and its determinants in China. Design A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted on 3541 households in China in 2015. Participants Households were selected using a stratified cluster sampling strategy, representing central, eastern, western and southern regions of China. The designed questionnaires were administered through face-to- face interviews. Outcome measures Household emergency preparedness was measured with 14 indicators, tapping into the supply of nine emergency necessities (food and water, extra batteries, battery-powered radio, battery-operated torch, first-aid kit, gas mask, fire extinguisher, escape ropes, whistle), coverage of accident insurance, knowledge of local emergency response systems (emergency numbers, exit routes and shelters) and availability of a household evacuation plan. If an individual acted on 9 of the 14 indicators, they were deemed well prepared. Logistic regression models were established to identify predictors of well preparedness based on 3541 returned questionnaires containing no missing values. Results Only 9.9% of households were well prepared for emergencies: 53.6% did not know what to do and 31.6% did not want to think about it. A higher level of preparedness was found in the respondents who have attained higher education (adjusted OR=0.826 compared with the higher level), participated in emergency training activities (adjusted OR=2.299), had better emergency knowledge (adjusted OR=2.043), reported less fate-submissiveness (adjusted OR=1.385) and more self-reliance (adjusted OR=1.349), prior exposure to emergency events (adjusted OR=1.280) and held more positive attitudes towards preparedness (adjusted OR=1.286). Conclusion Household preparedness for emergency events is poor in China. Lack of motivation, negative attitude to preparedness and knowledge shortfall are major but remediable barriers for household preparedness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.