Search

Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may associate with Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD). Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) or TNF alfa inhibitors (iTNF), had been involved in the ILD development as well as exacerbation of an existing one. Nowadays there is no consensus related to treatment. Objectives The aimed of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of Abatacept (ABA) treatment in patients with AR and ILD. Methods Multicentre study in patients with RA and ILD associated were treated with ABA. ILD was diagnosed by High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT). ABA was used at dose of 10 mg/kg/4 weeks iv or 125 mg/week sc. Its efficacy was evaluated according to the following measures: a) Dyspnea classified by the Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC); Significant variability of 1 point and asymptomatic MMRC=0; b) Pulmonary function test (PFT); Significant oscillations >10% in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) >10%; c) Imaging technique (HRCT); d) Joint assessment (DAS28). Quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± SD or as median (interquartile range) and compared with (Wilcoxon test) (Test Fisher) between the baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months. Results 34 individuals were included (19 women /15 men), patients with ILD associated to RA, with a mean age of 61,4 ± 9,8 years. The median duration of RA before ADA was initiated was 4,8 [0,86–13,12] (0–25) years, and had previously received an average 1,29±0,90 DMARDs. RA was seropositive in 24 cases (71%). ILD was associated with a DMARD: MTX (n=3), Etanercept (n=3), Adalimumab (n=3) y Certolizumab (n=1). ABA was used in monotherapy in 14 patients and combined with other immunosuppressors in 20 patients: Leflunomide (LFD) (n=7), LFD and cyclosporine (n=1), Sulfasalazine (n=1), MTX (n=2), MTX with LFD (n=1), hydroxychloroquine (n=5), Hydroxychloroquine with LFD (n=2), Azathioprine (n=1). A significant improvement of dyspnea was observed; patients who didn9t have dyspnea, kept asymptomatic. FVC and HRCT showed a significant improvement during 6 to 12 months period. DLCO remained stable in the majority of the patients. RA (DAS28) activity also improved. After follow up of 12,82±7,48 months, the most significant adverse effects were: pulmonary Infection (n=2), urinary infections (n=1), infusion reactions (n=1). ABA was discontinued due to: Serious infections (n=2); join inefficacy (n=2), pulmonary inefficacy (n=1), infusion reaction (n=1). Conclusions ABA seems to be an effective and relatively safe treatment in patients with RA and associated ILD. This data should be verified again in prospective and randomized studies. Disclosure of Interest None declared

Background This study shows that treatment with biologic drugs, including ant-TNF drugs, in NION associated to IMIDs, refractory to conventional treatment, seems to be effective. These results must be confirmed in prospective and randomised trials. Objectives Our aim was to compare anti-TNFα vs Rituximab (RTX) in refractory PUK. Methods Multicenter study of 24 patients with PUK. All of them presented inadequate response to corticosteroids and at least 1 systemic traditional immunosuppressive drug. Anti-TNFα were used in 17 patients: Adalimumab (n=9) 40 mg/sc every 1–2 weeks, infliximab (IFX) (n=7) 3–5 mg/kg iv/4–6 weeks, etanercept (n=1) 50 mg/week. RTX was used in 7 patients 1–2 g i.v. every 6 or 12 months. The main outcomes were Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA), signs of inflammation (scleritis and episcleritis), progression to corneal thinning, central keratolysis and ocular perforation. Results We studied 24 patients/32 affected eyes. The underlying diseases in the anti-TNFα group were Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) (n=14), Psoriatic Arthritis (n=2) and Behcet Disease (n=1); and in the RTX group: RA (n=5), granulomatous polyangiitis (n=1) and microscopic polyangiitis (n=1). At baseline there were no significant differences between both groups in general features or in ocular involvement (table 1). Before biologic therapy they had received the following systemic drugs (anti-TNFα vs RTX) i.v. methylprednisolone (2 vs 4), doxycycline (7 vs 1), ascorbic acid (2 vs 0), MTX (11 vs 4), AZA (1 vs 2) and others (7 vs 3). In addition,10 patients, in both groups, had required surgery: amniotic membrane (n=5), penetrating keratoplasty (n=2), conjunctival resection (n=2), tissue adhesives (n=2), conjunctival flap (n=1) and lamellar keratoplasty (n=1). Once the treatment was initiated the ocular outcome was similar (table 1). After a mean follow-up of 22.53±22.60 (anti-TNFα) and 22.28±8.28 months with RTX the following severe side effects were observed: supraventricular tachycardia (n=1) with RTX and pulmonary tuberculosis (n=1) with IFX. Conclusions In this study, anti-TNFα therapy and RTX were equally effective for the treatment of peripheral ulcerative keratitis associated to rheumatic diseases refractory to conventional treatment. Disclosure of Interest None declared

Objectives To investigate the primary respiratory manifestations (PRM) in SLE. Methods All patients in the RELESSER cohort were retrospectively investigated for the presence of PRM Results At least one PRM was present in 11.3% (365/3215) of cases. The most common was pleurisy, occurring in 21.1% of patients, followed by ALP in 3.6%, PE in 2.9%, PPH 4%, DILD in 2%, DAH in 0.8%, and SLS in 0.8%. The variables associated with the presence of PPM are shown in the following table 1: Conclusions PPM independently contributed to a decreased survival in SLE Disclosure of Interest None declared

Background Peripheric Ulcerative Keratitis (PUK) is a severe inflammation that may lead to ocular perforation. PUK may be primary or associated with systemic conditions. Treatment is based on corticosteroids and conventional systemic immunosuppressive drugs. Objectives To evaluate biologic therapy in cases with severe and refractory PUK. Methods Multicenter study from 9 hospitals. Patients presented inadequate response or intolerance to conventional therapy with corticosteroids and at least 1 systemic traditional immunosuppressive drug. The main outcome measures were visual acuity, signs of inflammation, progression to corneal thinning, central keratolysis and ocular perforation. Comparisons were made between baseline and 1st week, 1st month, 6th month and 1st year. Statistical analysis was performed using the software STATISTICA (StatSoft). Results were expressed as mean±SD for variables with a normal distribution, or as median [IQR] when they were not normally distributed. The comparison of continuous variables was performed using the Wilcoxon test and categorical variables with chi-square test. Results We studied 27 patients/35 affected eyes (7 men/20 women), mean age, 57.2±16.3 years (range 28–89). PUK was primary in 1 case whereas in the 26 remaining cases, the underlying diseases were Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) (n=19), Psoriasic Arthritis (n=2), RA+Felty syndrome+common variable immunodeficiency (n=1), Behcet Disease (n=1), Type I diabetes mellitus (n=1), granulomatous polyangiitis (n=1) and microscopic polyangiitis (n=1). They received the following topical therapy: corticosteroids (n=18), antibiotics (n=17), lubricants (n=18), autologous serum (n=11), topical cyclosporin 2% (n=11) and topical tacrolimus 0.03% (n=1). Besides oral corticosteroids and before the onset of the biologic therapy they had received iv pulses of methylprednisolone (n=8), methotrexate (16), oral doxycycline (9), azathioprine (3) and ascorbic acid (2). Moreover, 10 patients required surgery: amniotic membrane (n=7), penetrating keratoplasty (n=4), conjunctival resection (n=3), tissue adhesives (n=2), conjunctival flap (n=1) and lamellar keratoplasty (n=1). Anti-TNFα drugs were the most common biologic agents used in these cases (n=19): Adalimumab (ADA) (n=10; 37%), Infliximab (IFX) (n=8; 29.6%) and etanercept (n=1; 3.7%). In the remaining 8 cases the biologic agents were rituximab (n=7; 25.9%) and tocilizumab (n=1; 3.7%). The main outcome measures are summarized in the Table. After a mean follow-up of 23.7±20 months, all objective outcomes had improved with a reduction of the median prednisone dose from 33.7 [17.5–52.5] mg at baseline to 0 [0–2.5] mg (p=0.028). The main observed adverse effects were supraventricular tachycardia (n=1) and pulmonary Tuberculosis (n=1). Conclusions In our series, biological therapy, especially IFX and ADA, is effective and relatively safe in patients with PUK refractory to standard systemic treatment. Disclosure of Interest None declared

Background The WHO defines health as the state of physical, psychic and social well-being. In contrast, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) frequently report that treatment is directed mainly at combating physical affection and hardly anything to emotional and social aspects. Objectives To assess the emotional impact and degree of satisfaction with the medical care received in the patient with poor prognosis RA. Methods National, structured and anonymous survey of 26 questions conducted between March and July 2016. Responses were counted as percentages or as means/medians of the score given on a Likert scale from 1 to 10 (minimum and maximum, respectively). Analyzes were performed using Microsoft 2012: mean (m), standard deviation (SD), median (M), interquartile range (IQR) and statistical significance of differences (Student t test). The study was approved by the National Coordinator ConArtritis and the CEIC of the reference hospital. Results The survey was completed by 100 of 122 enrollees, 75 by telephone and 25 via email; 83 women and 17 men, with a mean age of 49.4 years (SD 12.1); from all the Spanish Autonomous Communities. 52% were considered of poor prognosis (participant9s own perception). 66.7% of self-perceived high-activity RA by patients exceeded the physician9s impression; and 31.03% of the intermediate-activity. The degree of knowledge and the importance given to certain aspects of the disease in relation to the poor prognosis ranged from 8 to 9/10 in the different items analyzed. The awareness of their seropositivity against FR and ACPA was 77% and 17%, respectively. 63% consider the physical aspect more disabling, but 52% gave more value to feeling good emotionally. The mean treatment score for physical aspects was 7.07 (SD 2.52), whereas for emotional aspects was 3.39 (SD 2.57). 51.9% of self-considered poor prognosis patients believed that biological treatment was delayed and 50% related that to poorer outcome. 97% wanted to participate in the doctor9s decisions, but 38% declared they had no choice. There were no statistically significant differences between the prognostic groups. Conclusions More than half of the patients self-reported poor prognosis. Two-thirds estimated poorer health status than physicians if their RA was of high activity; 1/3 if it was intermediate. Patients considered all assessed aspects as determinants of poor prognosis (m>8). The degree of knowledge of their condition was high, being lower for joint damage and activity and prognostic markers. The beginning of treatment with biologicals was perceived as delayed in more than half of those who declared themselves with poor prognosis and half of them related it to a worse evolution. A high percentage of patients showed low satisfaction with the emotional attention received. Most claim to be more involved in medical decisions, although more than 1/3 does not seem to be able to do so. Acknowledgements Coordinadora Nacional de Artritis (ConArtritis) Disclosure of Interest None declared

Background Patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) were classified in five subgroups: ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis, arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease, reactive arthritis and undifferentiated SpA (uSpA). ASAS criteria classify patients in peripheral SpA and axial SpA (axSpA), being the latest classified in two groups: classical AS and non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpa). Whether or not patients with nr-axSpA represent the same group of patients that used to be classified as uSpA remains unclear. Objectives To evaluate the similarities and differences between patients with predominant axial disease classified currently as nr-axSpA versus those traditionally classified as uSpA. Methods Baseline data from the ESPeranza program (a multicenter national initiative to early diagnose SpA between 2008 and 2011) was used. Inclusion criteria for this program were: age Results Compared to patients classified as uSpA patients with nr-axSpA were younger, had HLA-B27 positive more frequently and higher values of CRP. On the other hand, they had history of SpA less frequently and lower values for BASDAI, BASFI and ASQoL (table). No differences were observed for gender, work incapacity, dactilitis, enthesitis, Pt9s and Phy9s VAS, BASMI and BASRI. Conclusions Compared with patients traditionally classified as uSpA, patients who are currently classified as nr-axSpA are diagnosed earlier, are more frequently HLA-B27 carriers and have higher disease activity according to objective parameters. On the other hand, they report lower values for patient reported outcomes. Disclosure of Interest None declared