Search

Background Ultrasound (US) was found to have face and content validity for detecting synovitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with higher sensitivity than clinical examination. In order to test validity and improve the applicability of US in JIA, the OMERACT US pediatric subtask force recently published preliminary definitions for the sonographic features of synovitis in children. Objectives Aim of this study was to confirm and improve B-mode and color power/Doppler (PD) US definitions for synovial components and grading in children, by using an image and patient based exercise. Methods The definitions were confirmed and modified in a multi-step process. In the 1st step, definitions were developed in multi-round Delphi web based consensus process were ≥80% of participants would need to reach ≥80% of agreement on a Likert scale from 1–5 (1 strongly disagree, 2 disagree, 3 neutral, 4 agree, 5 strongly agree). In the 2nd step, in a face to face meeting, a subgroup of these experts revised the definitions for final wording and performed intra- and inter-observer reliability exercise study in JIA patients as the final 3rd phase of the process. The definitions were tested in four joints (wrist, 2nd MCP, knee and ankle) of JIA patients divided in four age groups following standardized image acquisition and machine setting protocol. Statistics program R (version 3.3.0) was used for the statistical analyses. For intra-rater agreement Cohen kappa and for inter-rater agreement prevalence and bias adjusted kappa (PABAK) were calculated if needed. Results Reliability exercise included 20 JIA patients (distributed in equal numbers by age groups), 14 observers, 4 joints/observer, 3 observers/joint, 360 intra- and 360 inter-observer tests. A 0–3 semi-quantitative B-mode and color power/Doppler US definitions for synovial components and grading, were agreed (presented in Figure 1). Conclusions The proposed synovitis grading for children showed to be reliable why the next step should be to test sensitivity to change in order to possibly be used as an outcome tool in JIA. Disclosure of Interest None declared

Background Joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is comprised of hyaline cartilage and bone damage, with the former more clearly associated with irreversible physical disability than bony damage. Objectives To test the reliability of a semiquantitative scoring system for the assessment of cartilage by musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) in a web-based exercise as well as a patient-based reliability study of patients with RA. Methods Static images of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints 2–5 in RA patients and healthy controls were acquired and a dataset of 123 anonymized images including 25 duplicate images was circulated among an international EULAR-OMERACT taskforce of 25 rheumatologist experts in US who independently scored the images using a semiquantitative scoring system. Subsequently 12 taskforce members participated in a patient-based reliability study. During this meeting MCP joints 2–5 of 6 patients with RA were assessed twice on the same day by all experts using US machines (GE) equipped with high-frequency transducers (18–22MHz) with presets calibrated for the appropriate assessment of cartilage. Participants assessed metacarpal cartilage both in the standardized longitudinal midline scan as well as by freehand technique utilizing multiple planes and scored by the semiquantitative scoring system. Intraobserver reliability was assessed by Cohen9s kappa and interobserver reliability by Fleiss9 kappa. Results The three-grade semiquantitative (Grade 0, normal cartilage; Grade 1, minimal change; Grade 2, severe change) scoring system demonstrated excellent (kappa: 0.87) to good (kappa: 0.73) intraobserver reliability in the web-based exercise and the patient-based reliability study respectively. Interobserver reliability was good in the web-based exercise (kappa: 0.64) and moderate (kappa: 0.49) in the patient-based reliability study. The dynamic technique performed slightly better than the longitudinal midline scan alone. Conclusions A semiquantitative scoring system demonstrated good intra- and moderate to good inter-observer reliability in a web-based exercise and patient-based reliability study. Our study demonstrates that US is a reliable tool for evaluating cartilage and supports the use of a new semiquantitative US scoring system for evaluating cartilage change in RA. Acknowledgements The patient-based reliability study was supported by a research grant from UCB. Disclosure of Interest None declared