van Thor MCJ, Lely RJ, Braams NJ, Ten Klooster L, Beijk MAM, Heijmen RH, van den Heuvel DAF, Rensing BJWM, Snijder RJ, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Nossent EJ, Meijboom LJ, Symersky P, Mager JJ, Bogaard HJ, and Post MC
Background: Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is an emerging treatment in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) and chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED). We describe the first safety and efficacy results of BPA in the Netherlands., Methods: We selected all consecutive patients with inoperable CTEPH and CTED accepted for BPA treatment who had a six-month follow-up in the St. Antonius Hospital in Nieuwegein and the Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC) in Amsterdam. Functional class (FC), N‑terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), 6‑minute walking test distance (6MWD) and right-sided heart catheterisation were performed at baseline and six months after last BPA. Complications for each BPA procedure were noted., Results: A hundred and seventy-two BPA procedures were performed in 38 patients (61% female, mean age 65 ± 15 years). Significant improvements six months after BPA treatment were observed for functional class (63% FC I/II to 90% FC I/II, p = 0.014), mean pulmonary artery pressure (-8.9 mm Hg, p = 0.0001), pulmonary vascular resistance (-2.8 Woods Units (WU), p = 0.0001), right atrial pressure (-2.0 mm Hg, p = 0.006), stroke volume index (+5.7 ml/m 2 , p = 0.009) and 6MWD (+48m, p = 0.007). Non-severe complications occurred in 20 (12%) procedures., Conclusions: BPA performed in a CTEPH expert centre is an effective and safe treatment in patients with inoperable CTEPH.