Search

An Open Letter signed by an international and diverse group of Jungian analysts, clinicians and academics on the topic of Jung and 'Africans' was published in the British Journal of Psychotherapy in November, 2018. It is presented together with Notes written by Andrew Samuels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper is written in the context of a debate within the Jungian clinical and academic communities on whether or not some kind of public statement is required concerning Jung’s writings about ‘Africans’, persons of colour and indigenous people. The author eschews argument in favour of such a public statement, opting instead for a ‘forensic’ discussion of the reasons why it is not a good plan to issue such a statement. By so doing, he creates a level playing field in which the ‘pros’ and ‘cons’ of a public statement may attract equal attention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper is written in the context of a debate within the Jungian clinical and academic communities on whether or not some kind of public statement is required concerning Jung’s writings about ‘Africans’, persons of colour and indigenous people. The author eschews argument in favour of such a public statement, opting instead for a ‘forensic’ discussion of the reasons why it is not a good plan to issue such a statement. By so doing, he creates a level playing field in which the ‘pros’ and ‘cons’ of a public statement may attract equal attention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author reviews the distortions of global politics wrought by US power and also by US vulnerability. It is understandable that many in the West are far from proud of the achievements of their culture. Those whose concern is for the management of climate change via ecopsychology are right to challenge ‘climate change denial’. But it is problematic when ‘salvation’ is sought from other cultures alleged to have a closer connection to ‘nature’ (itself a problematic term). Though well-meaning, this, the author contends, is politically and psychologically damaging. The author charges many Jungian attempts to compare the ‘Western psyche’ and the ‘psyche’ of indigenous peoples such as the Navajo Native Americans with cultural colonialism, Orientalism, and idealisation. He suggests that other political pathways and projects are needed if the desires of analytical psychology and Jungian studies to exercise social responsibility are to be realised. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents insights regarding psychotherapist and psychologist C. G. Jung by several Jungian analysts including Andrew Samuels, Ruth Williams, and Christopher Hauke. Hauke mentions that Jung was the first psychologist to use the terms like introversion and extraversion. Samuels states that Jung is an intuitive kind of person and that his writings are deeply problematic.