Search

The effect of fish oil on the course of ulcerative colitis was investigated in a randomised blinded controlled study. Eighty seven patients received supplements of 20 ml HiEPA fish oil as triglyceride (4.5 g of eicosapentaenoic acid) or olive oil placebo daily for one year. The oils were given in addition to standard drug therapy and trial entry was stratified for disease activity. Fish oil significantly increased the eicosapentaenoic acid content of rectal mucosa to 3.2% of total fatty acids at six months, compared with 0.63% for patients on olive oil. This was associated with increased synthesis of leukotriene B5, and 53% suppression of leukotriene B4 synthesis by ionophore--stimulated neutrophils. Leukotriene B4 suppression persisted for at least two months after treatment was stopped. Treatment with fish oil resulted in measurable, but only limited clinical benefit. For patients entering the trial in relapse (n = 53), there was a significant reduction in corticosteroid requirement after one and two months treatment. There was a trend towards achieving remission (off corticosteroids) faster in the patients on fish oil, although differences were not significant. For patients in remission at trial entry or during the trial (n = 69), there was no significant difference in the rate of relapse by log rank analysis. We conclude that fish oil supplementation produces a modest corticosteroid sparing effect in active disease, but there is no benefit in maintenance therapy.

A postal questionnaire inquiring about routine sedation and premedication practice for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was sent to 1048 doctors. Of 665 appropriate returns, 81% were from consultant physicians and surgeons. Most endoscopists (90%) reported using an intravenous benzodiazepine for at least three quarters of endoscopies and 54% of physicians and 69% of surgeons always did so. Midazolam was the intravenous sedative used by a third of all respondents and 13% also used an additional intravenous agent, usually pethidine. Over the previous two years a total of 119 respiratory arrests, 37 cardiac arrests, and 52 deaths were identified. Adverse outcomes were reported more frequently by consultant physicians, by those who 'titrated' the intravenous sedative, and by those who used an additional intravenous agent, but were reported equally frequently by endoscopists using midazolam and endoscopists using diazepam. There is an urgent need for a prospective study to identify the circumstances and risk factors associated with adverse outcomes related to endoscopy.

This study investigates whether aspirin injury to the human gastric mucosa can be prevented by profound acid suppression with omeprazole, in a randomised, double blind, crossover design according to latin square. It was concluded that profound acid suppression can prevent aspirin induced gastric mucosal injury in normal subjects. This approach may prevent the development of peptic ulcers and their complications in patients taking aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

The pharmacokinetics of metronidazole 500 mg orally were determined in patients with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis and normal controls in the Sudan, and in cirrhotics and normal controls in Bristol. Plasma metronidazole levels were above the minimum inhibitory concentration of most susceptible anaerobic bacteria for four to six hours post-dose in all groups. Liver disease did not markedly influence the disposition of single oral doses of metronidazole. Cirrhotics showed some prolongation of metronidazole half-life, and somewhat greater metronidazole concentrations 24 hours after the dose. Concentrations of the oxidative metabolite of metronidazole were lower in Sudanese patients and normal controls than in normal British subjects. In chronic liver disease adjustment of metronidazole dosage is probably not required provided renal function is unimpaired.

Azathioprine toxicity complicated the management of four patients with inflammatory bowel disease. All patients received the drug as adjunctive therapy to steroids when responses to the latter were poor. After a variable sensitising period the patients developed severe diarrhoea and abdominal pain and this was believed at first to be a manifestation of their underlying diseases but rechallenge with azathioprine reproduced the problem. During three episodes described emergency admission to hospital and resuscitation with intravenous fluids was required. The cases illustrate the difficulty clinicians have in recognising drug induced effects which mimic the underlying disease. When a patient suspects a reaction to azathioprine we believe any rechallenge should only be undertaken in the controlled hospital environment.

The plasma concentrations of ranitidine after oral and intravenous administration have been measured in 10 healthy young adults, nine cirrhotic patients, and eight healthy elderly people. In the first of these bioavailability was 51 +/- 4% and half life 161 +/- 11 minutes after oral and 124 +/- 5 minutes after intravenous administration. In the cirrhotics bioavailability was increased to 70 +/- 7%, clearance was reduced, and there was a modest increase in half life. In the elderly bioavailability was similar to that in young adults, clearance was markedly reduced, and half life was prolonged to 241 +/- 7 minutes after oral and 194 +/- 11 minutes after intravenous administration. It is predicted that blood levels in cirrhotics and the elderly would be 50 to 60% higher than in healthy young adults after repeated oral administration of similar doses.

Thirty-two patients with duodenal ulceration took trimipramine 50 mg or placebo. Fifteen patients on each treatment completed the study. Endoscopy at four weeks showed ulcer healing in seven (46%) patients on trimipramine, compared with only two (15%) on placebo (P less than 0.05). However, by eight weeks there were eight (53%) patients in both groups with healed ulcers. There were no significant differences between the two groups in ulcer symptoms. Drowsiness was reported by eight patients on trimipramine compared with only one on placebo. Trimipramine 50 mg appears to increase the rate of ulcer healing in the short term. Side-effects at the dose used may limit its long-term usefulness.

Cimetidine 200 mg three times daily and 400 mg at night was given to 10 subjects for four weeks. Apparent liver blood flow was measured by indocyanine green clearance and microsomal enzyme activity by antipyrine clearance, before and after cimetidine. There was no reduction in indocyanine green clearance but antipyrine clearance, as expected, was significantly reduced by 15% at four weeks. Chronic cimetidine treatment does not reduce apparent liver blood flow and is therefore unlikely to be of use in the treatment of portal hypertension. The cimetidine associated hepatic enzyme inhibition appears to persist with prolonged treatment. Therefore patients on chronic cimetidine remain vulnerable to certain drug interactions.

The hypothesis that an increased rate of oxidative metabolism may be an initiator or promoter of hepatocellular carcinoma was tested in vivo. Elimination of antipyrine (phenazone) was used as an index of the activity of microsomal mixed function oxidative enzymes. Plasma antipyrine kinetics were examined in 10 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and in 10 normal Sudanese adults. The half life, volume of distribution and clearance of antipyrine in patients were 18.8 +/- 7.9 hours (mean +/- SD), 33.8 +/- 7.7 litres and 23.7 +/- 10.1 ml/min, respectively; and in normal adults were 20.3 +/- 8.8 hours, 40.1 +/- 10.4 litres and 25.7 +/- 12.0 ml/min, respectively. These differences were not significant. Antipyrine plasma clearance when corrected for weight was similar in the two groups. This study suggests that in a population at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma, the overall activity of mixed function oxidative enzymes is not an important determinant in selectively increasing this risk.