Search

Objective: To measure changes in the training and workload of preregistration house officers over four years., Design: Postal questionnaire., Setting: The Thames health regions., Participants: 1049 preregistration house officers., Results: Response rate was 69% (725 replies). The proportion of house officers officially on duty > 83 hours a week fell from at least 42% to 21%, and the proportion officially on duty < or = 72 hours rose from no more than 9% to 40%. Adequate guidance in breaking bad news increased from 25% to 46% (p < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval for difference, 16.2% to 25.8%) and guidance in pain control increased from 36% to 46% (p < 0.01; 5.0% to 15.0%). The number of house officers attending an induction course increased from 61% to 94% (p < 0.001; 28.9% to 37.1%). There was no change in the proportion unable to attend formal educational sessions because of clinical commitments or in levels of satisfaction with consultants' educational supervision. The median number of inpatients under house officers' care fell from 20 to 17, but the numbers of patients clerked in an average week showed little change. House officers were less satisfied with the clinical experience their post provided (proportion dissatisfied rose from 30% to 39%; p < 0.01; 4.2% to 13.8%) and less enthusiastic about recommending their post to a friend (proportion neutral or not recommending rose from 30% to 42%, p < 0.0001; 7.9% to 16.9%)., Conclusion: Despite progress in reducing hours of duty and providing induction courses, the training that hospitals and consultants provide for house officers is still unsatisfactory and inconsistent with the General Medical Council's recommendations.

Objective: To assess the quality of preregistration house officer training in eight English regions., Design: Postal questionnaire., Setting: Thames, East Anglian, Mersey, Northern, and Wessex regions., Participants: 1670 preregistration house officers., Main Outcome Measures: Education, hours of work, workload, conditions of work, and attitudes to job and medicine as a career., Results: Response rate was 69% (1146 replies). Most house officers had attended induction courses (1036/1129 (92%)); 74% (757/1024) found them satisfactory. The proportions who had never received adequate guidance on how to break bad news and how to control pain were 59% (670/1135) and 56% (634/1136) respectively. There was much variation between regions. Overall, 65% (736/1138) reported confidence in performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Most respondents (95% (1089/1142)) worked an on call rota, 3% (36) a partial shift, and 0.6% (seven) a full shift; 19% (202) were on duty for average weekly hours that exceeded the targets for 1 April 1993. House officers had a median of 20 patients under their care and clerked a median of 10 emergency cases, six routine cases, and two day cases a week. Over half (690/1128 (61%)) could not obtain hot food after 8 pm, 20% (223/1095) did not always have clean sheets available in their on call room, and 45% (462/1036) did not consider the protection of staff against violence to be adequate at their hospital. The most important problems with the preregistration year were inappropriate or non-medical tasks (ranked first by 360 respondents), hours of work (359), and pay for out of hours work (167). Overall 57% (646/1125) would encourage a friend to apply for their post, but only 24% (266/1112) would encourage a friend to take up medicine and 44% (494/1112) would discourage the idea., Conclusions: House officers' training is deficient in important respects, with inappropriate tasks and heavy clinical workloads impeding the provision of proper education.

Objective: To evaluate the local use of written "Do not resuscitate" orders to designate inpatients unsuitable for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the event of cardiac arrest., Design: Point prevalence questionnaire survey of inpatients' medical and nursing records., Setting: 10 acute medical and six acute surgical wards of a district general hospital., Participants: Questionnaires were filled in anonymously by nurses and doctors working on the wards surveyed., Main Outcome Measures: Responses to questionnaire items concerning details about each patient, written orders not to resuscitate in the medical case notes and nursing records, whether prognosis had been discussed with patients' relatives, whether a "crash call" was perceived as appropriate for each patient, and whether the "crash team" would be called in the event of arrest., Results: Information was obtained on 297 (93.7%) of 317 eligible patients. Prognosis had been discussed with the relatives of 32 of 88 patients perceived by doctors as unsuitable for resuscitation. Of these 88 patients, 24 had orders not to resuscitate in their medical notes, and only eight of these had similar orders in their nursing notes., Conclusions: In the absence of guidelines on decisions about resuscitation, orders not to resuscitate are rarely included in the notes of patients for whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation is thought to be inappropriate. Elective decisions not to resuscitate are not effectively communicated to nurses. There should be more discussion of patients' suitability for resuscitation between doctors, nurses, patients, and patients' relatives. Suitability for resuscitation should be reviewed on every consultant ward round.

Objective: To assess the education and workload of preregistration house officers in the four Thames regions., Design: Postal questionnaire., Setting: Teaching and non-teaching hospitals in the four Thames regions., Participants: 1064 Preregistration house officers., Results: Response rate was 70% (740 replies). Nine per cent of house officers (66/729) worked a rota of one in two. The average house officer had 20.4 inpatients under his or her care and admitted 23.2 patients per week. Sixty two per cent of house officers (459/740) felt that they spent an excessive amount of time on non-medical tasks of no educational merit; 75% (546/725) had never received adequate guidance on breaking bad news and 64% (467/729) had never received adequate guidance on pain control; 34% (249/731) did not feel confident that they could perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation unsupervised. House officers would tend to recommend their post to a friend., Conclusions: There are deficiencies in preregistration training in the four Thames regions. The General Medical Council's requirements are not being heeded.

Objective: To detect differences in the education and workload of preregistration house officers working in teaching and non-teaching hospitals., Design: A postal questionnaire., Setting: Teaching and non-teaching hospitals in the four Thames regions., Participants: 1064 Preregistration house officers., Results: Response rate was 61% for teaching hospitals and 73% for non-teaching hospitals. House officers in teaching hospitals had significantly fewer inpatients under their care (house physicians 16.9 v 22.9, house surgeons 17.9 v 20.3) and admitted fewer emergency patients per week (house physicians 7.7 v 12.7, house surgeons 6.5 v 9.8). More house officers in teaching hospitals reported that they had too few patients to provide adequate clinical experience. More of their time was consumed by administrative activities devoid of educational value., Conclusion: Preregistration house officer posts at teaching hospitals provide less clinical activity and are perceived as less educationally satisfactory by their holders than those elsewhere.