Search

Early diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) leads to a decreased morbidity and mortality. General practice offers an important window for earlier diagnosis. The British HIV Association produced guidelines in 2008 advocating an increase in HIV testing, with specific references to primary care. This study explores the awareness of, and opinions towards, these guidelines within general practice. An email questionnaire was sent to 191 general practitioners nationwide, in both areas of high and low HIV prevalence. A total of 80 doctors replied, giving a response rate of 42%. In all, 44% of the respondents were unaware of the guidelines and 89% felt comfortable discussing and carrying out an HIV test themselves; of the 11% that did not, all but one were from low prevalence areas (P = 0.037). Respondents felt that main barrier to HIV testing was patient acceptability. Having read the guidelines, 70% believed it would be feasible to follow them in practice. Those who disagreed felt that time implications were the most important reason not to adopt the guidelines. Almost half the respondents were not aware of the guidelines; having read them, the majority felt that implementation is feasible. This demonstrates the necessity for better dissemination of these guidelines. This study found that the main barrier to performing an HIV test was felt to be patient acceptance, a contradiction to findings from recent pilot studies.

In response to the public outcry for mandatory testing for AIDS, this Article explores the major issues concerning the identification of persons with AIDS in society. The Article first studies testing procedures and the purposes behind them to determine if a call for mandatory testing of the general populace would better achieve society's objectives for identifying individuals with AIDS. Concluding that testing should not be required of the population as a whole, the Article then explores whether testing should be required of certain subpopulations which society perceives as likely to have or to spread the disease. In this context, too, the Article concludes that mandatory testing would be unwarranted, and that funds proposed for mandatory testing would be put to better use in education and universal precautions to prevent the further spread of AIDS.

Epidemiologic projects have been implemented for using dried-blood spot (DBS) specimens routinely collected on filter paper from neonates as a seroepidemiologic resource to monitor seroprevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) among childbearing women. To ensure the quality of the data base produced from the national and other epidemiologic surveys, a quality assurance program was developed to interact with all the neonatal screening laboratories. The focus of the Centers for Disease Control's quality assurance program for HIV seropositivity testing of neonatal blood specimens is to maintain a national program to produce, certify, and provide external quality control materials as DBSs on filter paper, to monitor the filter paper matrix, to operate an external performance surveillance program, and to provide other special and consultative services. The dried-blood control and surveillance materials are certified by rigorous testing for accuracy, stability, and homogeneity. Preliminary results from the first performance evaluation of screening laboratories indicated excellent performance.