Search

Background: Depression is common among nursing home residents and has a considerable impact on their quality of life. Therefore, there has been an increased interest in interventions aiming at the reduction of depression among nursing home residents. These interventions could be categorized into formal and informal depression care. Formal care includes psychosocial, psychotherapeutic and/or (neuro-)biological interventions. Informal care can be provided by nursing home staff, alongside the formal care (e.g., letting sunlight into the room when one believes in the positive effects of daylight). Although many studies have been done about depression treatment in nursing homes, there is still a lack of insight into the effectiveness of interventions and how they differ among specific target groups (e.g., residents with cognitive impairment versus residents with physical disabilities). Moreover, research into informal care is rather rare. More insight is needed into the effect of formal and informal depression care and the mutually reinforcing effects of those strategies on nursing home residents. This insight is essential to better match treatments with residents and to provide a more comprehensive approach to counter depression. Objectives: The aim of this study is to gain insight in the use of formal and informal depression care and their associations with depression among nursing home residents. Design: A six month cohort study will be conducted. Method: Residents will be recruited in nursing homes across the Netherlands and Flanders (Belgium). To measure formal and informal care, newly developed tools will be cross-culturally validated: one to assess the provided formal care in nursing homes, two tools for measuring the used informal strategies. Depression outcomes will be measured with the Geriatric Depression Scale, Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia, and the Nijmegen-Observer-Rated Depression-scale). Baseline measurements and cross- sectional analyses will be performed and repeated after six months. The intended associations will be assessed using multiple regression analysis. Conclusion: To develop a good depression care policy, a more comprehensive approach is needed and may benefit both residents and staff. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Challenging behavior is common in nursing home residents, especially in those with dementia. Our previous study suggested that a decrease in environmental stimuli (i.e., events that take place around residents but are not specifically directed at them) in nursing homes due to restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic, may affect residents differently. To improve future care, the experience of practitioners can be used to learn about the effects of environmental stimuli on challenging behavior in specific resident groups during the pandemic. From the perspective of practitioners, this study aimed to learn from successful initiatives and observed effects of decreased environmental stimuli on challenging behavior in residents during anti-pandemic measures. An online survey among 199 Dutch nursing home practitioners was conducted from November 2020 to January 2021. Practitioners were asked about alleged effects of diminished environmental stimuli in residents with different types of challenging behavior (i.e., psychotic, depressed, anxious, agitated, apathetic) and with mild vs. advanced or without dementia. Also, their opinion about strategies to limit environmental stimuli was explored. Residents with advanced dementia and those with psychotic and agitated behavior seemed to benefit from diminished environmental stimuli. In contrast, residents without dementia and those with depressive and apathetic behavior seemed to be negatively affected by decreased environmental stimuli. Practitioners indicated that they would like to preserve various strategies to limit environmental stimuli in the future such as reducing the use of corridors adjacent to residents' rooms. Also, they planned to use adjustments and new initiatives regarding organized activities such as an increased use of small-scale and person-oriented activities. Opinions were divided on receiving visitors in the living room and on imposing visiting hours. In open-ended questions, other initiatives were mentioned that can be useful in nursing home care. Various strategies and initiatives in nursing homes during the pandemic seem promising to meet individual needs. While many residents may be negatively affected by restrictions during the pandemic, specific resident groups may benefit from a decrease in environmental stimuli. These findings underline the importance of a good balance between stimuli and rest in the nursing home, tailored to an individual resident. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anti-COVID-19 measures for preventing infections in long-term care, such as quarantine and social isolation, revealed the importance of telehealth and telecommunication. To optimize nursing home care in the future, it is important to learn from the experiences with telecommunication and telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, for proper implementation, it is necessary to provide a solid infrastructure, to educate and train the staff and residents regarding telecommunication, and to integrate telehealth in daily workflows (Seifert I et al. i , 2020). [Extracted from the article]

Background: Although formal treatments like antidepressants and psychotherapy may effectively reduce depression in nursing home residents, side effects and poor treatment adherence are common. To improve depression care, it is important to also learn from informal strategies already used successfully in daily practice, alongside or in absence of formal treatment. For example, although not prescribed as formal treatment, a care provider may seat a resident with depression at a table near the window. This may have antidepressant effects due to extra day light or pleasant views from the window. Objectives: To identify, categorize, and prioritize informal antidepressant strategies for residents already used in daily practice as reported by residents themselves, their relatives, and professional caregivers. Method: In the first Group Concept Mapping study, residents, relatives, and professional caregivers (N = 124) brainstormed on strategies to prevent or improve depression that may be performed by residents themselves. In the second study, the same participants (N = 110) reported on strategies others involved in residents' lives could perform. In a second round of both studies, participants rated the expected effectiveness (N = 54, N = 51 respectively) and feasibility (N = 50 for both studies) of the strategies mentioned. In addition, strategies for both studies were sorted based on similarity in meaning by experts. Results: Six clusters appeared for actions to be undertaken by residents themselves, and five clusters for actions by others. The results showed that, for strategies by residents, the clusters 'Being socially connected' and 'Participating in activities', and for strategies by others, the cluster 'Offering personal attention' stand out the most in terms of high expected effectiveness. The cluster with strategies executed by residents that stood out as the most feasible was 'Having a healthy living environment'. The most feasible clusters performed by others were 'Offering personal attention', 'Using positive treatment/approach', and 'Using or adapting the physical environment'. Conclusion: By using an innovative bottom-up participatory approach, this research shed light on various clusters of useful informal antidepressant strategies for daily practice. To test effectiveness and implementation, research is needed on these antidepressant strategies and their regular use in care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]