Search

Objective: It has been posited that alcohol use may confound the association between greater concussion history and poorer neurobehavioral functioning. However, while greater alcohol use is positively correlated with neurobehavioral difficulties, the association between alcohol use and concussion history is not well understood. Therefore, this study investigated the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between cumulative concussion history, years of contact sport participation, and health-related/psychological factors with alcohol use in former professional football players across multiple decades. Participants and Methods: Former professional American football players completed general health questionnaires in 2001 and 2019, including demographic information, football history, concussion/medical history, and health-related/psychological functioning. Alcohol use frequency and amount was reported for three timepoints: during professional career (collected retrospectively in 2001), 2001, and 2019. During professional career and 2001 alcohol use frequency included none, 1-2, 3-4, 5-7 days/week, while amount included none, 12, 3-5, 6-7, 8+ drinks/occasion. For 2019, frequency included never, monthly or less, 2-4 times/month, 2-3 times/week, >4 times/week, while amount included none, 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-9, 10+ drinks/occasion. Scores on a screening measure for Alcohol Use Disorder (CAGE) were also available at during professional career and 2001 timepoints. Concussion history was recorded in 2001 and binned into five groups: 0, 1-2, 3-5, 6-9, 10+. Depression and pain interference were assessed via PROMIS measures at all timepoints. Sleep disturbance was assessed in 2001 via separate instrument and with PROMIS Sleep Disturbance in 2019. Spearman's rho correlations tested associations between concussion history and years of sport participation with alcohol use across timepoints, and whether poor health functioning (depression, pain interference, sleep disturbance) in 2001 and 2019 were associated with alcohol use both within and between timepoints. Results: Among the 351 participants (Mage=47.86[SD=10.18] in 2001), there were no significant associations between concussion history or years of contact sport participation with CAGE scores or alcohol use frequency/amount during professional career, 2001, or 2019 (rhos=-.072-.067, ps>.05). In 2001, greater depressive symptomology and sleep disturbance were related to higher CAGE scores (rho=.209, p<.001; rho=.176, p<.001, respectively), while greater depressive symptomology, pain interference, and sleep disturbance were related to higher alcohol use frequency (rho=.176, p=.002; rho=.109, p=.045; rho=.132, p=.013, respectively) and amount/occasion (rho=.215, p<.001; rho=.127, p=.020; rho=.153, p=.004, respectively). In 2019, depressive symptomology, pain interference, and sleep disturbance were not related to alcohol use (rho s=-.047-.087, p s>.05). Between timepoints, more sleep disturbance in 2001 was associated with higher alcohol amount/occasion in 2019 (rho=.115, p=.036). Conclusions: Increased alcohol intake has been theorized to be a consequence of greater concussion history, and as such, thought to confound associations between concussion history and neurobehavioral function later in life. Our findings indicate concussion history and years of contact sport participation were not significantly associated with alcohol use cross-sectionally or longitudinally, regardless of alcohol use characterization. While higher levels of depression, pain interference, and sleep disturbance in 2001 were related to greater alcohol use in 2001, they were not associated cross-sectionally in 2019. Results support the need to concurrently address health-related and psychological factors in the implementation of alcohol use interventions for former NFL players, particularly earlier in the sport discontinuation timeline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sports medicine clinicians face conflicts of interest in providing medical care to athletes. Using a survey of college football players, this study evaluates whether athletes are aware of these conflicts of interest, whether these conflicts affect athlete trust in their health care providers, or whether conflicts or athletes' trust in stakeholders are associated with athletes' injury reporting behaviors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Subjective cognitive difficulties (SCDs) are associated with factors commonly reported in older adults and former contact sport athletes, regardless of objective cognitive decline. We investigated the relative contribution of these factors to SCD in former National Football League (NFL)-players with and without a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI)., Methods: Former NFL players (n = 907) aged ≥ 50 years (mean = 64.7 ± 8.9), with (n = 165) and without (n = 742) a diagnosis of MCI completed health questionnaires. Multivariable regression and dominance analyses determined the relative importance of SCD factors on SCD: 1) depression, 2) anxiety, 3) sleep disturbance, 4) pain interference, 5) ability to participate in social roles and activities, 6) stress-related events, 7) fatigue, 8) concussion history, and 9) education. SCD outcomes included Neuro-QoL Emotional-Behavioral Dyscontrol and the PROMIS Cognitive Function. Fisher's z-transformation compared comorbid contributing factors to SCD across MCI and non-MCI groups., Results: Complete dominance of anxiety was established over most comorbid factors across the MCI and non-MCI groups. Fatigue also exhibited complete dominance over most comorbid factors, though its influence in the MCI group was less robust (general dominance). Average contributions to variance accounted for by comorbid factors to ratings of SCD across MCI and non-MCI groups did not statistically differ (Z-statistics <1.96, ps>.05)., Conclusions: Anxiety and fatigue are the most robust factors associated with SCD in former professional football players across various combinations of clinical presentations (different combinations of comorbid factors), regardless of documented cognitive impairment. Self-reported deficits may be less reliable in detecting objective impairment in the presence of these factors, with multidimensional assessment being ideal.