1. Informing estimates of probability of Clostridioides difficile infection for testing and treatment: expert consensus from a modified-Delphi procedure
- Author
-
Jonathan D. Baghdadi, Mia Wessel, Erik R. Dubberke, Alison Lydecker, Kimberly C. Claeys, Carolyn Alonso, K.C. Coffey, Michael Durkin, Anne J. Gonzales-Luna, Alice Y. Guh, Jennie H. Kwon, Elise Martin, Preeti Mehrotra, Christopher R. Polage, Michael S. Pulia, Clare Rock, Andrew M. Skinner, Valerie M. Vaughn, Tara Vijayan, Michael E. Yarrington, Daniel J. Morgan, and for the CDC Prevention Epicenters Program
- Subjects
Infectious and parasitic diseases ,RC109-216 ,Public aspects of medicine ,RA1-1270 - Abstract
Abstract Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) may be misdiagnosed if testing is performed in the absence of signs or symptoms of disease. This study sought to support appropriate testing by estimating the impact of signs, symptoms, and healthcare exposures on pre-test likelihood of CDI. Methods: A panel of fifteen experts in infectious diseases participated in a modified UCLA/RAND Delphi study to estimate likelihood of CDI. Consensus, defined as agreement by >70% of panelists, was assessed via a REDCap survey. Items without consensus were discussed in a virtual meeting followed by a second survey. Results: All fifteen panelists completed both surveys (100% response rate). In the initial survey, consensus was present on 6 of 15 (40%) items related to risk of CDI. After panel discussion and clarification of questions, consensus (>70% agreement) was reached on all remaining items in the second survey. Antibiotics were identified as the primary risk factor for CDI and grouped into three categories: high-risk (likelihood ratio [LR] 7, 93% agreement among panelists in first survey), low-risk (LR 3, 87% agreement in first survey), and minimal-risk (LR 1, 71% agreement in first survey). Other major factors included new or unexplained severe diarrhea (e.g., ≥ 10 liquid bowel movements per day; LR 5, 100% agreement in second survey) and severe immunosuppression (LR 5, 87% agreement in second survey). Conclusion: Infectious disease experts concurred on the importance of signs, symptoms, and healthcare exposures for diagnosing CDI. The resulting risk estimates can be used by clinicians to optimize CDI testing and treatment.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF