1. Information and Veridicality: Information Processing and the Bar-Hillel/Carnap Paradox
- Author
-
Nir Fresco and Michaelis Michael
- Subjects
History ,media_common.quotation_subject ,05 social sciences ,Information processing ,Foundation (evidence) ,Inference ,Cognition ,06 humanities and the arts ,0603 philosophy, ethics and religion ,050105 experimental psychology ,Epistemology ,Veridicality ,Philosophy ,History and Philosophy of Science ,060302 philosophy ,Contradiction ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Semantic information ,Mathematics ,media_common - Abstract
Floridi’s Theory of Strongly Semantic Information posits the Veridicality Thesis (i.e., information is true). One motivation is that it can serve as a foundation for information-based epistemology being an alternative to the tripartite theory of knowledge. However, the Veridicality thesis is false, if ‘information’ is to play an explanatory role in human cognition. Another motivation is avoiding the so-called Bar-Hillel/Carnap paradox (i.e., any contradiction is maximally informative). But this paradox only seems paradoxical, if (a) ‘information’ and ‘informativeness’ are synonymous, (b) logic is a theory of inference, or (c) validity suffices for rational inference; a, b, and c are false.
- Published
- 2016