Search

Novel induction agents markedly improved remission rates in multiple myeloma (MM), and the continued use of chemotherapy for CD34 + stem cell mobilization (SCM) has been questioned. We examined the additional effect of chemotherapy in SCM regarding remission status/morbidity. We reviewed 236 consecutive MM patients (aged 36 to 75 years) with first autologous stem cell transplantation from January 2009 to March 2016 after chemotherapy-based SCM. Responses were measured by changes in intact Ig and free light chain levels before and after chemomobilization (International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG] criteria). Most patients (225/236, 95.3%) received novel induction regimens, which were bortezomib-based (n = 223) and/or lenalidomide-based (n = 19). Most patients (170/190, 89.5%) achieved at least partial remission postinduction and pre-SCM. Stem cells were mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and cyclophosphamide-based (212/227, 93.4%) or etoposide-based (15/227, 6.6%) regimens. There were insignificant changes in serum Ig and free light chain levels before and after chemomobilization either in the whole cohort or subgroups. Significant improvements of the IMWG remission status were documented in only 7 of 236 patients (3.0%). Sixty-seven patients (28.4%) developed chemotherapy-related complications (neutropenic fever, sepsis, and others), resulting in 9 hospitalizations (3.8%). Our study suggests that although causing significant morbidity, chemotherapy-based mobilization fails to improve remission status. The value of incorporating additional chemotherapy for SCM is thus not evident., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) in patients with myeloid malignancies is better in those without minimal residual disease (MRD) than in those with MRD+, as assessed by multiparametric flow cytometry (MPFC). WT1 quantitation also has been used to assess the probability of relapse in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) treated with chemotherapy. We analyzed the clinical value of normalized bone marrow WT1 levels as a measure of the expanded myeloid progenitor compartment in a consecutive series of 193 adult patients with myeloid malignancies who underwent HCT. Bone marrow WT1 levels before the HCT, at the first bone marrow aspirate after infusion, and in the follow-up samples after HCT were determined by means of real-time PCR using the European LeukemiaNet normalized method. We sought to clarify the prognostic relevance in terms of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Based on earlier experience in AML, we selected a threshold of 100 copies, defining 2 groups: patients with <100 WT1 copies and those with ≥100 copies. Patients with <100 WT1 copies before HCT (median time, 36 days; range, 4 to 268 days) had a better OS, PFS, and CIR than those with ≥100 copies (40 ± 1 versus 29 ± 6 days, P = .004; 35 ± 9 versus 26 ± 6 days, P = .002; and 29 ± 7 versus 37 ± 6 days, P = .051). In the first bone marrow study after the HCT (median time, 42 days; range 14 to 157 days, respectively), patients with <100 WT1 copies also had better outcomes in terms of OS, PFS, and CIR (40 ± 7 versus 31 ± 9 days, P = .025; 36 ± 7 versus 30 ± 8 days, P = .004; and 29 ± 6 days versus 54 ± 9, P < .001, respectively). At this time point, bone marrrow samples with >100 copies also included patients who were negative for MRD as assessed by MPFC (19 of 32). During the HCT follow-up, patients with sustained WT1 levels <100 copies showed a marked benefit in terms of OS, PFS, and CIR even compared with those with only a single measurement >100 copies (mean, 68 ± 11 versus 26 ± 7 days, P < .001; 63 ± 11 versus 20 ± 8 days, P < .001; and 20 ± 8 vs. 71 ± 8 days, P < .001, respectively). Standardized bone marrow WT1 levels using a 100-copy threshold in samples obtained before HCT, at leukocyte recovery, and during follow-up provided relevant prognostic information in patients with myeloid malignacies submitted to HCT., (Copyright © 2017 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Relapse of hematological malignancies after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) is associated with poor prognosis. A second HCT represents one of the few therapeutic options for these high-risk patients. For children undergoing second HCT, the outcome data are particularly limited. We, therefore, conducted a retrospective single-institution study and report the outcomes and prognostic variables associated with overall survival (OS) and relapse in 43 pediatric patients who underwent a second HCT between 2000 and 2013. Eleven of the 43 patients who underwent transplantation remain alive and disease-free at a median follow-up of 49 months (range, 5 to 127 months). The 5-year probability of OS for the entire cohort was 24%. Patients who had early relapse (<6 months) after first HCT had significantly worse OS than those who relapsed late (>6 months), with 5-year OS at 11% versus 34%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 2.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21 to 4.93; P = .013). Active disease at time of second HCT was also associated with a significantly increased risk of relapse (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 2.36; P = .049) for the entire cohort and relapse was the most frequent cause of death (23 of 32; 72%). On subgroup analysis for the 34 patients with leukemia alone, presence of active disease was associated both with a significant decrease in OS (SHR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.02 to 5.09; P = .044) and significant increase in the rate of relapse (SHR, 2.46; P = .046). By contrast, underlying disease, donor source, conditioning regimen, or development of GVHD did not modify OS or rate of relapse. Hence, a second HCT appears to be a useful therapeutic option in children with relapsed hematological malignancies that is most likely to benefit those individuals with late onset of relapse and with low disease burden at the time of transplantation., (Copyright © 2015 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)