Search

Objective: To explore the inhibitory effect of icotinib combined with cytokine induced killer (CIK) on various human lung adenocarcinoma cell lines in vitro. Methods: The inhibitory effect of icotinib alone or icotinib combined with CIK on HCC827 and A549 cells was detected by cell counting kit-8(CCK-8). The apoptosis was detected by flow cytometry via Annexin V/PI staining. The effect of icotinib on CIK phenotype was detected by flow cytometry. Results: The inhibitory rates of HCC827 cells treated with 1.5, 3, 6, 12 μmol/L icotinib were (5.64±0.05)%, (8.62±0.45)%, (14.57±0.65)% and (18.52±0.91)%, respectively. The inhibitory rates of A549 cells were (1.64±0.48)%, (2.09±0.28)%, (3.69±0.45)%, (4.41±0.58)%, respectively. At the same concentration, the inhibitory rate of HCC827 cells with icotinib treatment was significantly higher than that of A549 cells ( P <0.05). When the effector/target ratio was 10∶1, 20∶1 or 40∶1, the inhibitory rates of HCC827 cells co-cultured with CIK were (15.17±2.33)%, (42.59±7.18)%, (62.59±8.95)%, respectively, and the inhibitory rates of A549 were(16.99±2.81)%, (46.31±1.89)%, (58.24±4.23)%, respectively. The inhibitory rate of HCC827 cells co-cultured with CIK was not significantly different from that of A549 cells at the same effector/target ratio ( P (10∶1)=0.299, P (20∶1)=0.318, P (40∶1)=0.366). When the effector/target ratio of CIK combined with 6 μmol/L icotinib was 10∶1, 20∶1 or 40∶1, the inhibitory rates of HCC827 cells were (37.07±3.50)%, (76.03±6.55)%, (80.34±10.69)%, respectively, and the inhibitory rates of A549 cells were(25.72±1.41)%, (52.76±3.82)%, (62.26±1.94)%, respectively. The inhibitory rates of 6 μmol/L icotinib combined with CIK were significantly higher than those of icotinib group and CIK group alone at the same effector/target ratio ( P <0.05), except for the effector/target ratio at 40︰1 on A549 cells ( P =0.089). Moreover, all of the combination index (CI) of combined group were <1 ( P <0.05). The apoptotic rates of HCC827 and A549 cells induced by icotinib combined with CIK were significantly higher than those of icotinib group and blank control group ( P <0.05), especially the proportion of late apoptotic or necrotic cells.Increasing effector/target ratio of CIK contributed to stronger inhibition( P <0.05). The expressional rate of CIK phenotype with or without icotinib treatment was not significantly different from each other( P >0.05). Conclusions: EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma cells are more sensitive to icotinib, while the EGFR mutation status has no effect on the killing effect of CIK cells. icotinib combined with CIK has a synergistic effect on the inhibition of tumor growth, and icotinib has no any impact on the phenotype of CIK cells.

Objective: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering effect of 0.004% travoprost and 2% carteolol in patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) after laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) or trabeculectomy in primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG)., Methods: Clinical case control trial. 52 consecutive PACG patients (52 eyes) with IOP > 21 mm Hg (1 mm Hg = 0.133 kPa) after LPI or trabeculectomy were enrolled. 24 patients received topical application of 0.004% travoprost (once daily) and 28 received 2% carteolol (twice daily). IOP lowering effect of travoprost and carteolol before and after treatment was measured by Goldmann tonometer and compared using t-test. The relationship of IOP lowering effect and the degree of angle open was performed by gonioscope and analyzed using Spearman rank correlation., Results: Compared with pre-treatment, the IOP was significantly reduced in 24 patients (24 eyes) in 0.004% travoprost group [pre-treatment: (24.67 ± 3.08) mm Hg, post-treatment: (18.58 ± 2.71) mm Hg; t = 6.600, P < 0.05], while significantly reduced in 28 patients (28 eyes) received 2% carteolol [pre-treatment: (23.57 ± 1.60) mm Hg, post-treatment: (19.57 ± 1.60) mm Hg; t = 5.130, P < 0.05]. 0.004% travoprost group is more significant in both quantity and percentage of IOP lowering than 2% carteolol (t = 2.533, 2.532; P < 0.05). There was no correlation between the IOP lowering effect and the degree of angle open in both groups (0.004% travoprost r = 0.145, 0.009; P > 0.05; 2% carteolol r = 0.090, 0.183, P > 0.05)., Conclusions: Both of 0.004% travoprost and 2% carteolol reduce IOP in patients with OHT after LPI or trabeculectomy in PACG. 0.004% travoprost is more effective than 2% carteolol in IOP lowering. However, the decrease of IOP is not acted through the alteration of anterior chamber angle in both study groups.