1. How accurate are visual assessments by physical therapists of lumbo-pelvic movements during the squat and deadlift?
- Author
-
Falk J, Aasa U, and Berglund L
- Subjects
- Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Movement, Posture, Young Adult, Clinical Competence, Lumbosacral Region physiology, Pelvis physiology, Physical Therapists, Weight Lifting physiology
- Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the accuracy of visual assessments made by physical therapists of lumbo-pelvic movements during the squat and deadlift and how much movement is considered injurious., Design: Quantitative Cross-sectional., Participants: 14 powerlifters, 10 Olympic weightlifters and six physical therapists., Setting: The lifters were recorded simultaneously by video and an inertial measurement unit (IMU) system while performing squats and deadlifts. The physical therapists assessed the videos and rated whether specific lumbo-pelvic movements were visible during the lifts and whether the movement amplitude was considered injurious., Main Outcome Measures: The nominal visual assessments, if there was a movement and if it was considered injurious, were compared to the degrees of movement attained from the IMU system., Results: During the squat, a posterior pelvic tilt of ≥34° was required to visually detect the movement. For other lumbo-pelvic movements, there was no significant difference in the amount of movement between those who were assessed as moving or not moving their lumbo-pelvic area, nor was there a difference in movement amplitude between those who were assessed as having an increased risk of injury or not., Conclusions: Physical therapists did not consistently detect lumbo-pelvic movements during squats and deadlifts when performed by competitive lifters., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None declared., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF