Search

ObjectivesTo explore attitudes and intentions towards COVID-19 vaccination, and influences and sources of information about COVID-19 across diverse ethnic groups (EGs) in the UK.DesignRemote qualitative interviews and focus groups (FGs) conducted June-October 2020 before UK COVID-19 vaccine approval. Data were transcribed and analysed through inductive thematic analysis.SettingGeneral public in the community across England and Wales.Participants100 participants from 19 self-identified EGs with spoken English or Punjabi.ResultsMistrust and doubt were common themes across all EGs including white British and minority EGs, but more pronounced amongst Bangladeshi, Pakistani, Black ethnicities and Travellers. Many participants shared concerns about perceived lack of information about COVID-19 vaccine safety, efficacy and potential unknown adverse effects. Across EGs participants stated occupations with public contact, older adults and vulnerable groups should be prioritised for vaccination. Perceived risk, social influences, occupation, age, co-morbidities and engagement with healthcare influenced participants’ intentions to accept vaccination once available; all Jewish FG participants intended to accept, while all Traveller FG participants indicated they probably would not.Facilitators to COVID-19 vaccine uptake across all EGs included: desire to return to normality and protect health and wellbeing; perceived higher risk of infection; evidence of vaccine safety and efficacy; vaccine availability and accessibility.COVID-19 information sources were influenced by social factors, culture and religion and included: friends, family; media and news outlets; and research literature. Participants across most different EGs were concerned about misinformation or had negative attitudes towards the media.ConclusionsDuring vaccination programme roll-out, including boosters, commissioners and vaccine providers should provide accurate information, authentic community outreach, and use appropriate channels to disseminate information and counter misinformation. Adopting a context-specific approach to vaccine resources, interventions and policies and empowering communities has potential to increase trust in the programme.Article summary: strengths and limitationsThis is amongst the largest qualitative studies on attitudes to the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK general public across ethnic groups (EGs), ages and religions, adding insights from a broader range of participants.Qualitative methodology enabled discussion of participants’ responses around COVID-19 vaccination, probing to collect rich data to inform recommendations across EGs.Most data collection was undertaken in English, possibly excluding sectors of the population who may access COVID-19 information through different sources due to language.Data collection was June-October 2020 before COVID-19 vaccines were licensed. Attitudes are highly responsive to current information around a COVID-19 vaccine, as well as the state of the pandemic and perceived risk. Data were collected prior to much of the intervention work, putting the attitudes and intentions expressed in this study in a context of minimal community engagement and support. This provides a baseline snapshot of attitudes, providing the option to explore and assess the impact of such interventions.Socioeconomic data and index of multiple deprivation were not collected, limiting the ability to determine a possible accumulative effect of factors such as socioeconomic status, ethnicity and age.

ObjectivesTo explore public reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic across diverse ethnic groups.DesignRemote qualitative interviews and focus groups in English or Punjabi. Data were transcribed and analysed through inductive thematic analysis.SettingEngland and Wales June-October 2020.Participants100 participants from 19 diverse ‘self-identified’ ethnic groups.ResultsDismay, frustration and altruism were reported across all ethnic groups during the first six to nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Dismay was caused by participants’ reported individual, family and community risks, and loss of support networks. Frustration was caused by reported lack of recognition of the efforts of minority ethnic groups (MEGs), inaction by government to address COVID-19 and inequalities, rule breaking by government advisors, changing government rules around: border controls, personal protective equipment, social distancing, eating out, and perceived poor communication around COVID-19 and the Public Health England (PHE) COVID-19 disparities report (leading to reported increased racism and social isolation). Altruism was felt by all, in the resilience of NHS staff and their communities and families pulling together. Data, participants suggested actions, and the Behaviour Change Wheel informed suggested interventions and policies to help control COVID-19.ConclusionTo maintain public trust, it is imperative that governmental bodies consider vulnerable groups, producing clear COVID-19 control guidance with contingency, fiscal, service provision and communication policies for the next rise in COVID-19 cases. This needs to be combined with public interventions including information, education, modelling and enablement of infection prevention through local community involvement and persuasion techniques or incentivisation. Government policy needs to review and include town and social planning leading to environmental restructuring that facilitates infection prevention control. This includes easy access to hand-washing facilities in homes, work, all food providers and shopping centres; toilet facilities as our Travellers mentioned, and adequate living accommodation and work environment facilitating IPC for all.Strengths and limitationsThis is amongst the largest qualitative studies on attitudes to the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK general public across ethnic groups, ages and religions, adding insights to previous smaller qualitative studies, from a broader range of participants.The qualitative methodology allowed us to discuss participants’ responses around the COVID-19 pandemic, probing their answers to obtain detailed data to inform needs across ethnic groups.Most data collection was undertaken in English and therefore excludes non-English speaking sectors of the population who may have experienced the COVID-19 pandemic differently.We did not obtain the views of older members of the population over 70 years, who were most at risk.The data reflect public perceptions six to nine months into the pandemic when some of the social distancing rules had been relaxed in England; as the pandemic progresses attitudes and needs may well change.