Search

ABSTRACT Background : The II Brazilian Consensus on Gastric Cancer of the Brazilian Gastric Cancer Association BGCA (Part 1) was recently published. On this occasion, countless specialists working in the treatment of this disease expressed their opinion in the face of the statements presented. Aim : To present the BGCA Guidelines (Part 2) regarding indications for surgical treatment, operative techniques, extension of resection and multimodal treatment. Methods: To formulate these guidelines, the authors carried out an extensive and current review regarding each declaration present in the II Consensus, using the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library and SciELO databases initially with the following descriptors: gastric cancer, gastrectomy, lymphadenectomy, multimodal treatment. In addition, each statement was classified according to the level of evidence and degree of recommendation. Results : Of the 43 statements present in this study, 11 (25,6%) were classified with level of evidence A, 20 (46,5%) B and 12 (27,9%) C. Regarding the degree of recommendation, 18 (41,9%) statements obtained grade of recommendation 1, 14 (32,6%) 2a, 10 (23,3%) 2b e one (2,3%) 3. Conclusion : The guidelines complement of the guidelines presented here allows surgeons and oncologists who work to combat gastric cancer to offer the best possible treatment, according to the local conditions available.

ABSTRACT Background: The II Brazilian Consensus on Gastric Cancer by the Brazilian Gastric Cancer Association (ABCG) was recently published. On this occasion, several experts in gastric cancer expressed their opinion before the statements presented. Aim: To present the ABCG Guidelines (part 1) regarding the diagnosis, staging, endoscopic treatment and follow-up of gastric cancer patients. Methods: To forge these Guidelines, the authors carried out an extensive and current review regarding each statement present in the II Consensus, using the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library and SciELO databases with the following descriptors: gastric cancer, staging, endoscopic treatment and follow-up. In addition, each statement was classified according to the level of evidence and degree of recommendation. Results: Of the 24 statements, two (8.3%) were classified with level of evidence A, 11 (45.8%) with B and 11 (45.8%) with C. As for the degree of recommendation, six (25%) statements obtained grade of recommendation 1, nine (37.5%) recommendation 2a, six (25%) 2b and three (12.5%) grade 3. Conclusion: The guidelines presented here are intended to assist professionals working in the fight against gastric cancer with relevant and current information, granting them to be applied in the daily medical practice.

ABSTRACT Background: Since the publication of the first Brazilian Consensus on Gastric Cancer (GC) in 2012 carried out by the Brazilian Gastric Cancer Association, new concepts on diagnosis, staging, treatment and follow-up have been incorporated. Aim: This new consensus is to promote an update to professionals working in the fight against GC and to provide guidelines for the management of patients with this condition. Methods: Fifty-nine experts answered 67 statements regarding the diagnosis, staging, treatment and prognosis of GC with five possible alternatives: 1) fully agree; 2) partially agree; 3) undecided; 4) disagree and 5) strongly disagree A consensus was adopted when at least 80% of the sum of the answers “fully agree” and “partially agree” was reached. This article presents only the responses of the participating experts. Comments on each statement, as well as a literature review, will be presented in future publications. Results: Of the 67 statements, there was consensus in 50 (74%). In 10 declarations, there was 100% agreement. Conclusion: The gastric cancer treatment has evolved considerably in recent years. This consensus gathers consolidated principles in the last decades, new knowledge acquired recently, as well as promising perspectives on the management of this disease.

RACIONAL: O controle do sangramento na hepatectomia é um desafio para os cirurgiões. A clampagem do pedículo hepático é manobra cirúrgica que pode promover redução do sangramento, mas provoca isquemia hepatocelular. Isso, junto com a reperfusão depois que a clampagem termina, leva à lesão de isquemia e reperfusão. OBJETIVO: Examinar os efeitos da lesão de isquemia e reperfusão no fígado após clampagem contínua e intermitente do pedículo hepático, usando a quantificação de apoptose como ferramenta. MÉTODO: Vinte coelhos New Zealand foram divididos em grupos 1 (controle), 2 (60 minutos de isquemia contínua) e 3 (60 minutos de isquemia intermitente alternando 12 minutos de isquemia e três minutos de reperfusão). Biópsias hepáticas foram colhidas antes e ao fim da isquemia e após seis horas de reperfusão, quando os animais eram sacrificados. Os fragmentos obtidos foram submetidos à análise histológica e histoquímica (reação de Tunel). Campos microscópicos foram analisados para caracterização e quantificação de apoptose. RESULTADOS: A isquemia levou à elevação do índice apoptótico em ambos os grupos experimentais em relação aos controles, mas similar entre eles. Depois da reperfusão os índices voltaram aos valores iniciais. CONCLUSÃO: A clampagem do pedículo hepático, tanto contínua quanto intermitente, induz a apoptose em células hepáticas de modo igual.BACKGROUND : The control of bleeding in hepatectomy is a challenge for surgeons. The hepatic pedicle clamping is a surgical maneuver that can provide reduction in bleeding, but it provokes a hepatocellular suffering. This, along with reperfusion after the clamping finishes, leads to an injury known as ischemia/reperfusion injury. AIM: To examine the effects of the ischemia/reperfusion injury on the liver after continuous and intermittent hepatic pedicle clamping in an animal model, using the quantification of apoptosis for evaluation. METHOD: Twenty New Zealand rabbits were assigned to groups 1 (control), 2 (60 minutes of continuous ischemia) and 3 (60 minutes of intermittent ischemia alternating 12 minutes of ischemia and three minutes of reperfusion). Liver biopsies were collected before ischemia, at its end and after six hours of reperfusion, when the animals were killed. The liver fragments were subjected to histological analysis (paraffinization and hematoxilin-eosin staining) and histochemical (Tunel reaction). Microscope fields of view were scanned for characterization and quantification of apoptosis. RESULTS : Ischemia led to an increased apoptotic index in both experimental groups in comparison to controls, but similarly between them. After the reperfusion, the indexes returned to baseline values. CONCLUSION: Clamping of the hepatic pedicle, either continuous or intermittent, induces apoptosis in liver cells in a similar way.

RACIONAL: Apesar da apendicite aguda ser uma das afecções cirúrgicas mais comuns, o melhor tratamento do coto apendicular ainda não foi definido. Na apendicectomia laparotômica há preferência pela ligadura e sepultamento do coto enquanto, na laparoscópica, pela ligadura simples ou clampeamento. OBJETIVOS: Comparar duas técnicas de tratamento do coto apendicular na apendicectomia laparotômica (ligadura simples vs ligadura com confecção de bolsa e sepultamento) por meio de análise prospectiva e randomizada. MÉTODOS: Entre os anos de 2003 e 2005, 113 pacientes foram submetidos à apendicectomia laparotômica por apendicite aguda. O coto apendicular foi tratado por ligadura simples em 49 casos e por ligadura e sepultamento em 64 casos. Os dois grupos foram semelhantes em relação às médias de idade, gênero, sinais e sintomas pré-operatórios, tempo de evolução da doença e fase da apendicite aguda diagnosticada pelo exame anatomopatológico. RESULTADOS: Não houve diferença estatística significativa entre os dois grupos em relação ao tempo de duração da operação, presença de complicações (infecção de ferida operatória, deiscência de ferida, formação de abscessos, obstrução intestinal, seroma e formação de fístula) ou tempo de internação. CONCLUSÃO: As duas técnicas são igualmente seguras para tratamento do coto apendicular.BACKGROUND: Although acute appendicitis is one of the most common surgical diseases, the best treatment of the appendicular stump has not been defined. At laparotomy for appendectomy the stump is treated preferably by ligation and burial of the stump and, in laparoscopic surgery, by simple ligation or clamping. AIM: To compare two techniques for the treatment of appendicular stump in appendectomy (simple ligation vs ligation with purse making and burial) by a prospective and randomized study. METHODS: Between the years 2003 and 2005, 113 patients underwent laparotomy appendectomy for acute appendicitis. The appendiceal stump was treated by simple ligation in 49 cases and by ligation and burial in 64 cases. The two groups were similar in terms of average age, gender, preoperative signs and symptoms, time of disease progression and stage of appendicitis diagnosed histopathological examination. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the duration of operation, complications (wound infection, wound dehiscence, abscess formation, intestinal obstruction, fistula and seroma ) or hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques are equally safe for treatment of appendicular stump, and so, it is possible to recommend simple ligation because it is easier to be done.

ABSTRACT Introduction: Gastric gastrointestinal tumors (GIST) are a rare and usually asymptomatic neoplasm that can present as abdominal mass in more advanced scenarios. Since surgical resection is the main aspect of the treatment, locally advanced tumors require multivisceral resection and, therefore, higher postoperative morbidity and mortality. Objective: To perform a review the literature on the topic, with emphasis on the neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: Literature review on the Medline database using the following descriptors: gastrointestinal stromal tumors, neoadjuvant therapy, imatinib mesylate and molecular targeted therapy. Results: Surgical resection remains the cornerstone for the treatment of GISTs; however, tyrosine kinase inhibitors have improved survival as an adjuvant therapy. More recently, neoadjuvant therapy have been described in the treatment of locally advanced tumors in order to avoid multivisceral resection. Conclusion: Despite surgical resection remains as the most important aspect of the treatment of GISTs, adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors have shown to both improve survival and resectability, respectively.